Ever wondered why the big beasts in software all suddenly slapped an 'I heart open-source' badge on?

Red Hat's State of Enterprise Open Source might have an answer


A shift within the enterprise to open source is gathering pace due less to total cost of ownership and more to innovations around infrastructure and container technologies, according to a new report.

The survey, based on interviews with 1,250 IT leaders (unaware that it was Red Hat sponsoring the activity) found 64 per cent of respondents citing "infrastructure modernisation" as the top use for enterprise open source (up from 53 per cent two years ago) with application development and the nebulous "digital transformation" coming second and third respectively.

Almost half of respondents had container technologies (such as Kubernetes) in production and another 37 per cent were using containers for development.

It all seems a little fast-moving for the traditionally lethargic world of enterprise technology.

Google Android toy in front of a laptop showing some code

If Google and Apple won't help us, we'll sort it out the Linux way: 21 companies form Mobile Native Foundation

READ MORE

"The old model," according to Gordon Haff, senior principal product marketing manager for Red Hat, "was you got a piece of software, you put your legacy apps on it, and then you preferably didn't have to breathe on it for the next 10 years!"

Indeed, The Register is aware of one UK high-street bank alleged to be running customer-facing apps on the very-out-of-support Windows Server 2003. Of the institution, an anonymous source within Microsoft laughed: "Only one?"

"That's not an option any longer," Haff told us.

Considering the ongoing evolution of technologies such as Kubernetes and the churn within the cloud-native arena, sitting on one's hands for a decade or more is indeed no longer an option. Although, as Haff noted, companies such as Red Hat, Oracle and Canonical have attempted to make open-source innovation more "consumable" for enterprises concerned about their core infrastructure. A majority of those enterprises also expected that their container usage would increase over the next 12 months.

Do you care if your vendor contributes?

Kubernetes continues to be the big beast as far as cloud-native application strategies are concerned. Only 1 per cent of respondents did not feel it was important at all while 85 per cent described the orchestration tech as anything from Important to Extremely Important.

Another discovery in the study was that lowering TCO, once seen as the number one benefit associated with open source, had fallen to number six in the rankings. This could well reflect a dawning realisation that just because the code might sometimes be free, enterprise levels of support most definitely are not.

Edge computing, AI and ML also look to be big winners for enterprise open source over the next few years with respondents expecting proprietary software usage to decrease.

Haff told us that a new question had been added this year – one that might go some way to answering the questions of those pondering the born-again approach to open source adopted by companies such as Microsoft: "Do you care if your vendor contributes to upstream projects and participates in the open-source community?"

"I kind of expected," Haff told us, "not that many would care."

He was wrong. Lurking at the end of the report was the surprising result that "38 per cent are 'much more likely' to select a vendor who contributes, and 45 per cent are 'somewhat more likely' to do so."

A Red Hat veteran of more than a decade, Haff said: "I'm pretty sure we would not have gotten the results like that maybe even five years ago." ®


Other stories you might like

  • North Korea pulled in $400m in cryptocurrency heists last year – report

    Plus: FIFA 22 players lose their identity and Texas gets phony QR codes

    In brief Thieves operating for the North Korean government made off with almost $400m in digicash last year in a concerted attack to steal and launder as much currency as they could.

    A report from blockchain biz Chainalysis found that attackers were going after investment houses and currency exchanges in a bid to purloin funds and send them back to the Glorious Leader's coffers. They then use mixing software to make masses of micropayments to new wallets, before consolidating them all again into a new account and moving the funds.

    Bitcoin used to be a top target but Ether is now the most stolen currency, say the researchers, accounting for 58 per cent of the funds filched. Bitcoin accounted for just 20 per cent, a fall of more than 50 per cent since 2019 - although part of the reason might be that they are now so valuable people are taking more care with them.

    Continue reading
  • Tesla Full Self-Driving videos prompt California's DMV to rethink policy on accidents

    Plus: AI systems can identify different chess players by their moves and more

    In brief California’s Department of Motor Vehicles said it’s “revisiting” its opinion of whether Tesla’s so-called Full Self-Driving feature needs more oversight after a series of videos demonstrate how the technology can be dangerous.

    “Recent software updates, videos showing dangerous use of that technology, open investigations by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the opinions of other experts in this space,” have made the DMV think twice about Tesla, according to a letter sent to California’s Senator Lena Gonzalez (D-Long Beach), chair of the Senate’s transportation committee, and first reported by the LA Times.

    Tesla isn’t required to report the number of crashes to California’s DMV unlike other self-driving car companies like Waymo or Cruise because it operates at lower levels of autonomy and requires human supervision. But that may change after videos like drivers having to take over to avoid accidentally swerving into pedestrians crossing the road or failing to detect a truck in the middle of the road continue circulating.

    Continue reading
  • Alien life on Super-Earth can survive longer than us due to long-lasting protection from cosmic rays

    Laser experiments show their magnetic fields shielding their surfaces from radiation last longer

    Life on Super-Earths may have more time to develop and evolve, thanks to their long-lasting magnetic fields protecting them against harmful cosmic rays, according to new research published in Science.

    Space is a hazardous environment. Streams of charged particles traveling at very close to the speed of light, ejected from stars and distant galaxies, bombard planets. The intense radiation can strip atmospheres and cause oceans on planetary surfaces to dry up over time, leaving them arid and incapable of supporting habitable life. Cosmic rays, however, are deflected away from Earth, however, since it’s shielded by its magnetic field.

    Now, a team of researchers led by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) believe that Super-Earths - planets that are more massive than Earth but less than Neptune - may have magnetic fields too. Their defensive bubbles, in fact, are estimated to stay intact for longer than the one around Earth, meaning life on their surfaces will have more time to develop and survive.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022