Australia picks third fight with Big Tech, this time over browser and search on mobile devices

Regulator keen to know how Android Choice works in the EU, what makes the Google/Apple relationship tick, and if Salesforce buying Slack is a problem

Australia is going after Big Tech again, this time with research on “the impact of default settings and pre-installation of search services and web browsers on consumer choice and competition.”

The nation’s Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) yesterday called for submissions that will help it to compile a “Report on market dynamics and consumer choice screens in search services and web browsers,” due in September 2021.

An Issues Paper [PDF] spells out five areas the ACCC wants to probe, namely:

  1. The impact of pre-installation and default settings on consumer choice and competition, particularly in relation to online search and browsers.
  2. Supplier behaviour and trends in search services, browsers and operating systems, and device ecosystems, that may impact the supply of search and browsers to Australian consumers.
  3. The extent to which existing consumer harm can arise from the design of defaults and other arrangements.
  4. The effectiveness of Google’s Android choice screen roll out in Europe and whether it is fit for purpose within Australia.
  5. Whether there are any proposals, other than choice screens, that may facilitate competition and improve consumer choice in the supply of general search services and browsers in Australia.

The mention of Europe’s Android choice screen suggests Australia quite fancies a similar arrangement.

Someone facing a dilemma

Google to offer users a choice of default search engine on Android in the EU – but it's pay to play


The Commission’s announcement of the probe also mentions the US Department of Justice’s antitrust case against Google and The Chocolate Factory’s alleged payments that secure its search services as the default on Apple devices.

The new probe is an extension of Australia’s Digital Platforms Inquiry, an effort that has already seen the nation successfully create a pay-for-news scheme under which Google and (probably) Facebook will fund local publishers. The Inquiry has also spawned a probe into whether Apple and Google’s app stores hurt competition. The report on that matter will be released on March 31st.

The Register hopes the authors of that report haven’t finished just yet, because earlier this week Epic Games’ Australian tentacle sued Google over Play Store terms and conditions (after doing the same to Apple in November 2020).

In a separate probe also announced yesterday, the ACCC has cast its eye over Salesforce's planned acquisition of Slack.

The regulator has asked for opinions on the following matters:

  • Availability of alternatives to Salesforce’s CRM solution, and how the alternative CRM supplier differs based on factors such as price, quality and features;
  • Availability of alternatives to Slack’s enterprise collaboration, and how the alternative platform differs based on factors such as price, quality and features;
  • The ability of Salesforce’s CRM customers and Slack’s customers to switch to alternatives (as applicable);
  • If you are a Salesforce user, the importance of being able to integrate your application with various enterprise software collaboration platforms;
  • If you are a Slack user, the importance of being able to integrate your application with various CRM solutions;
  • Any other competition concerns relevant to the ACCC’s consideration of the proposed acquisition.


Narrower topics

Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022