Oracle dangles new cloud lift-and-shift service in the wake of SAP RISE

It's all about driving down costs on OCI... so it can compete with AWS, claims analyst


Oracle has launched a free service it hopes will convince more customers to shift their applications to the cloud – Oracle’s cloud, that is.

In a launch that bears more than a striking resemblance to RISE, SAP's recently launched programme to migrate customers to the fluffy white stuff, Oracle has put its hat in the ring with Oracle Cloud Lift Services (OCLS).

OCLS was created to give Oracle customers “expanded access to technical tools and cloud engineering resources to quickly migrate workloads to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI).”

The service promises a “single point of contact for all technical delivery and removes critical expertise barriers for adoption of OCI services”, in what might be a tacit admission that issues sometimes fall between infrastructure and application technical teams during cloud migration.

Oracle also said it would provide guidance from cloud engineers on planning, architecting, prototyping and managing cloud migrations.

In a launch interview from his kitchen, Vinay Kumar, senior veep for Oracle engineering, said customers sometimes felt they didn’t have the competencies to move to Oracle Cloud. Also, they feel it takes too long to get any return. Internal education and proof of concept could be lengthy, he admitted.

Remarkably, nobody – despite trying – has moved any substantial Oracle customers to their cloud or cloud database...

Meanwhile, there was the problem with integrating with existing cloud infrastructure, he added.

“Customers were like, ‘I already have one cloud, or at most two and it takes a long time to integrate yet another cloud’. This is because the workload is one thing, but making cloud work seamlessly with the controls that customers have in on-prem? That was the biggest barrier [to moving to the cloud] that we uncovered,” Kumar said.

OCLS is an offer to “de-risk” this by giving a single port of call and contract for the relevant Oracle skills. Oracle said it was working with other suppliers on the service, but has so far only named Infosys.

RISE vs Cloud Lift

In January, SAP launched a similar-sounding service in RISE, but with some differences: SAP launched with a long list of systems integrators and consultancies on board. It also promised to take customers to any of the three most popular hyperscalers, as well as its own cloud.

Lastly, while SAP promises to lift and shift users' existing applications, a second part of its service is to analyse business processes and help customers move on to the latest version of applications, transforming their business as they go, or so SAP has said.

Someone looking bored at an old-school TV

About $15m in advertising booked to appear on millions of smart TVs was never seen by anyone, says Oracle

READ MORE

Holger Mueller, veep and principal analyst at Constellation Research, said Oracle needs to move its customers to its cloud to make the economies of scale work on the infrastructure, although it has the luxury of a lot of "organic" load under its control.

“If anything it is a sign that Oracle is confident about its Cloud Gen2 now,” he said.

“SAP threw the kitchen sink at RISE, desperate for cloud revenue. Oracle wants and needs cloud revenue – but is not throwing everything at it, yet.”

Mueller said the main reason that Oracle was only offering the service for its own cloud infrastructure was to drive up volumes, and hence drive down cost, so it could attempt to compete more effectively with AWS on price.

“It has an advantage in that OCI was designed to run Oracle workloads – so they truly run best there. Remarkably, nobody – despite trying – has moved any substantial Oracle customers to their cloud or cloud database.

With Oracle getting Gen2 going – this will get even harder,” Mueller said.

One customer did move their data out of Oracle: Amazon. ®

Broader topics


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022