Facebook says dump of 533m accounts is old news. But my date of birth, name, etc haven't changed in years, Zuck

Account info swiped in 2019, sold online, now given away for free


Updated Reams of personal data – including phone numbers, email addresses, and birthdays – obtained from 533 million Facebook accounts was offered to all for free on a cyber-crime forum over the weekend.

The data dump was flagged up by Alon Gal, co-founder and CTO of infosec startup Hudson Rock. The information – which also includes people’s names, marital status, occupation, and location – was siphoned from Facebook in 2019 via a security weakness in the platform. The data was packaged up and sold online to miscreants in June 2020.

Now that same database is up for grabs to anyone who messages a particular Telegram account and asks nicely. The records were pilfered from hundreds of millions of Facebook profiles spread across 104 countries; that includes 32,315,282 accounts in the US, and 11,522,328 in the UK, according to a post on the underground forum viewed by The Register. All of the data amounts to over 70GB. It's reported the price tag on the database has been falling, and now it's free of charge.

Facebook is keen to shrug this off. We're told the data theft was in the news in 2019, and the exploited security hole was closed that same year.

That doesn't quite change the fact that people's stolen info has been circulating online for nearly three years, and that even though it all happened in 2019, names, dates of birth, contact details, and other data are unlikely to have changed in that time.

Instead, it's likely the data is still largely useful for fraudsters to exploit – assuming the vast majority of users put in the correct information on their profiles and not fake info just in case this sort of theft happened.

“This is old data that was previously reported on in 2019," a spokesperson for Mark Zuckerberg's tech giant told us. "We found and fixed this issue in August 2019."

Meanwhile, Gal told The Register: “Firstly, I'd like Facebook to acknowledge the leak and the importance of it.

"Secondly, they should alert all users that this has happened and have the users be alert to impending social engineering and hacking attacks. Lastly, I think Facebook should rotate Facebook IDs to block bad actors from being able to link phone numbers to Facebook profiles through the leak as can be currently done, this is only a small step but a crucial one.”

You can see if your profile is in this latest dump by entering your deets into Have I Been Pwned or Have I Been Zucked. ®

Updated to add on April 6

Facebook now says "malicious actors obtained this data not through hacking our systems but by scraping it from our platform prior to September 2019." It went on:

We believe the data in question was scraped from people’s Facebook profiles by malicious actors using our contact importer prior to September 2019. This feature was designed to help people easily find their friends to connect with on our services using their contact lists.

When we became aware of how malicious actors were using this feature in 2019, we made changes to the contact importer. In this case, we updated it to prevent malicious actors from using software to imitate our app and upload a large set of phone numbers to see which ones matched Facebook users. Through the previous functionality, they were able to query a set of user profiles and obtain a limited set of information about those users included in their public profiles.

Similar topics

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • DigitalOcean tries to take sting out of price hike with $4 VM
    Cloud biz says it is reacting to customer mix largely shifting from lone devs to SMEs

    DigitalOcean attempted to lessen the sting of higher prices this week by announcing a cut-rate instance aimed at developers and hobbyists.

    The $4-a-month droplet — what the infrastructure-as-a-service outfit calls its virtual machines — pairs a single virtual CPU with 512 MB of memory, 10 GB of SSD storage, and 500 GB a month in network bandwidth.

    The launch comes as DigitalOcean plans a sweeping price hike across much of its product portfolio, effective July 1. On the low-end, most instances will see pricing increase between $1 and $16 a month, but on the high-end, some products will see increases of as much as $120 in the case of DigitalOceans’ top-tier storage-optimized virtual machines.

    Continue reading
  • GPL legal battle: Vizio told by judge it will have to answer breach-of-contract claims
    Fine-print crucially deemed contractual agreement as well as copyright license in smartTV source-code case

    The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) has won a significant legal victory in its ongoing effort to force Vizio to publish the source code of its SmartCast TV software, which is said to contain GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 copyleft-licensed components.

    SFC sued Vizio, claiming it was in breach of contract by failing to obey the terms of the GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 licenses that require source code to be made public when certain conditions are met, and sought declaratory relief on behalf of Vizio TV owners. SFC wanted its breach-of-contract arguments to be heard by the Orange County Superior Court in California, though Vizio kicked the matter up to the district court level in central California where it hoped to avoid the contract issue and defend its corner using just federal copyright law.

    On Friday, Federal District Judge Josephine Staton sided with SFC and granted its motion to send its lawsuit back to superior court. To do so, Judge Staton had to decide whether or not the federal Copyright Act preempted the SFC's breach-of-contract allegations; in the end, she decided it didn't.

    Continue reading
  • US brings first-of-its-kind criminal charges of Bitcoin-based sanctions-busting
    Citizen allegedly moved $10m-plus in BTC into banned nation

    US prosecutors have accused an American citizen of illegally funneling more than $10 million in Bitcoin into an economically sanctioned country.

    It's said the resulting criminal charges of sanctions busting through the use of cryptocurrency are the first of their kind to be brought in the US.

    Under the United States' International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEA), it is illegal for a citizen or institution within the US to transfer funds, directly or indirectly, to a sanctioned country, such as Iran, Cuba, North Korea, or Russia. If there is evidence the IEEA was willfully violated, a criminal case should follow. If an individual or financial exchange was unwittingly involved in evading sanctions, they may be subject to civil action. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022