UK Home Office tenders £5m for a supplier to help it greenlight IT projects. Yes, you read that correctly

Procurement raises questions over supplier creating its own sales pipeline within govt

The UK's Home Office is tendering to recruit a supplier to help manage the selection of its IT projects, leading to concerns over conflict of interest.

The notice published in the public sector Digital Marketplace is seeking a company to help deliver and operate the "discovery-as-a-service" capability for the "Innovation - Law Enforcement" (I-LE) function within the Police and Public Protection Technology Portfolio (PPPT), with a £5m contract on the table.

The snappy moniker – DaaS – alludes to the discovery phase in the UK government's IT project service manual. Discovery, it says, means learning about users and what they're trying to achieve; constraints the project faces in making changes to how the service is run because, for example, of technology or legislation; and the underlying policy intent the project is set to address and so on.

The Home Office sees the discovery phase as part of "demand management," which is procurement speak for only giving users what they really need, rather than what they want or what they say they need.

Observers will note that, without appropriate safeguards in place, the contract seemingly leaves open the possibility of the winning supplier managing the project selection process in favour of services it offers, with an inside track on the client's thinking.

One supplier working with the UK government, who asked not to be named, said it could mean the winning bidder is given the opportunity to develop a sales lead pipeline within government, putting it in the prime spot for picking up more work.


AWS tops up the Bezos rocket fund thanks to more money from Brit tax collection agency


Last year, AWS's Professional Services wing was handed a £2m contract by Her Majesty's Customs and Revenue to supply consultants that would work on accelerating the adoption of AWS products and services in the British tax collection agency.

The Register also understands that Home Office insiders are aware of the possible conflicts of interest, but no safeguards have been put in place. The individual, who asked not to be named, is also concerned that the winner may have already been selected.

The Home Office said of the tender: "This will not be a sales pipeline for the winning supplier. The Demand Management process will ensure that all work meets the needs and priorities of the Home Office in the most appropriate and efficient way to deliver value for money."

It went on to insist: "All associated procurement will adhere to the public procurement policy framework, ensuring free and open competition and value for money."

The DaaS tender comes at a sensitive time for UK government procurement as the former chief commercial officer Bill Crothers, who founded the Crown Commercial Service (CCS), responsible for much of the cross-Whitehall IT spending and large government frameworks, is at the centre of a media storm over commercial lobbying in government.

It emerged last week that Crothers joined Greensill Capital, a supply chain finance firm, as an adviser before he left the civil service in 2015.

He joined the firm as a director in 2016.

Former prime minister David Cameron, who worked as a special adviser to the Greensill board, is alleged to have sent texts and emails to ministers while working for the company. ®

Other stories you might like

  • Venezuelan cardiologist charged with designing and selling ransomware
    If his surgery was as bad as his opsec, this chap has caused a lot of trouble

    The US Attorney’s Office has charged a 55-year-old cardiologist with creating and selling ransomware and profiting from revenue-share agreements with criminals who deployed his product.

    A complaint [PDF] filed on May 16th in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleges that Moises Luis Zagala Gonzalez – aka “Nosophoros,” “Aesculapius” and “Nebuchadnezzar” – created a ransomware builder known as “Thanos”, and ransomware named “Jigsaw v. 2”.

    The self-taught coder and qualified cardiologist advertised the ransomware in dark corners of the web, then licensed it ransomware to crooks for either $500 or $800 a month. He also ran an affiliate network that offered the chance to run Thanos to build custom ransomware, in return for a share of profits.

    Continue reading
  • China reveals its top five sources of online fraud
    'Brushing' tops the list, as quantity of forbidden content continue to rise

    China’s Ministry of Public Security has revealed the five most prevalent types of fraud perpetrated online or by phone.

    The e-commerce scam known as “brushing” topped the list and accounted for around a third of all internet fraud activity in China. Brushing sees victims lured into making payment for goods that may not be delivered, or are only delivered after buyers are asked to perform several other online tasks that may include downloading dodgy apps and/or establishing e-commerce profiles. Victims can find themselves being asked to pay more than the original price for goods, or denied promised rebates.

    Brushing has also seen e-commerce providers send victims small items they never ordered, using profiles victims did not create or control. Dodgy vendors use that tactic to then write themselves glowing product reviews that increase their visibility on marketplace platforms.

    Continue reading
  • Oracle really does owe HPE $3b after Supreme Court snub
    Appeal petition as doomed as the Itanic chips at the heart of decade-long drama

    The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Oracle's appeal to overturn a ruling ordering the IT giant to pay $3 billion in damages for violating a decades-old contract agreement.

    In June 2011, back when HPE had not yet split from HP, the biz sued Oracle for refusing to add Itanium support to its database software. HP alleged Big Red had violated a contract agreement by not doing so, though Oracle claimed it explicitly refused requests to support Intel's Itanium processors at the time.

    A lengthy legal battle ensued. Oracle was ordered to cough up $3 billion in damages in a jury trial, and appealed the decision all the way to the highest judges in America. Now, the Supreme Court has declined its petition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022