Don't cross the team tasked with policing the surfing habits of California's teens

You don't get me, I'm part of the union

Who, Me? Bid farewell to the weekend with a tale of surfing snoopage and automation rejected in another story from The Register's Who, Me? files.

We stick with the current century in today's retelling and skip to the sunny US state of California and a school district with hundreds of thousands of students and teachers.

"A massive behemoth of a school district," our reader, Regomised as "Gavin", told us. And a beast to manage.

"The district had numerous issues ranging from students misbehaving online to poor network performance," he explained. "Since all traffic was backhauled from the schools to a central office and then sent on its merry way, they had a complex environment (made even more complex by those misbehaving students).

"Each school had a network connection to the central office starting with a lowly T-1 link and able to have bandwidth increased as needed."

This was the mid-2000s, and such internet access was still a bit of a novelty. "Especially to many teachers," he added. "Students, not as much."

Ensuring that all that lovely bandwidth, unfettered access to which was enjoyed by the students, was being put to educational use rather than something more nefarious was a bit of a challenge. Certainly, the teachers (who doubtless were barely able to operate a VCR) didn't have time for it.

So the district had a team whose sole job was assessing requests for more bandwidth and checking that the bulk of the traffic was not as a result of other "recreational" uses.

Enter Gavin and his employer. Their nifty product was able to spot the source and type of traffic. Reports could be spat out showing which schools were using what bandwidth, what applications were using it and so on.

Angry man on laptop. Illustration via Shutterstock

You want a reboot? I'll give you a reboot! Happy now?


It would, Gavin said in his best sales mode, "save all sorts of time and money since all those employees who spent their days investigating this stuff could easily be moved to more critical functions, right? Save time and money, make things easier, more reliable, and consistent. It was win-win."

Except it wasn't. Gavin had reckoned without the power of the unions (similar to the experience of another reader who attempted to streamline a casino payroll system).

It transpired that those tasked with looking at logs were quite happy in their current roles, thank you, and did not care for some newfangled reporting software making their positions anything other than secure when it came to the dispensing of bandwidth.

The deal was never closed and humans continued to take the lead in studying the traffic generated by the students and deciding if a bandwidth upgrade was in order.

What could possibly have gone wrong with that?

Ever attempted to roll out a whizzy bit of time-saving tech only to run headlong into users more keen on the way things were? Or were you one of those users on the receiving end of a managerial attempt at efficiency? Tell all with an email to Who, Me? ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading
  • Cloud security unicorn cuts 20% of staff after raising $1.3b
    Time to play blame bingo: Markets? Profits? Too much growth? Russia? Space aliens?

    Cloud security company Lacework has laid off 20 percent of its employees, just months after two record-breaking funding rounds pushed its valuation to $8.3 billion.

    A spokesperson wouldn't confirm the total number of employees affected, though told The Register that the "widely speculated number on Twitter is a significant overestimate."

    The company, as of March, counted more than 1,000 employees, which would push the jobs lost above 200. And the widely reported number on Twitter is about 300 employees. The biz, based in Silicon Valley, was founded in 2015.

    Continue reading
  • Talos names eight deadly sins in widely used industrial software
    Entire swaths of gear relies on vulnerability-laden Open Automation Software (OAS)

    A researcher at Cisco's Talos threat intelligence team found eight vulnerabilities in the Open Automation Software (OAS) platform that, if exploited, could enable a bad actor to access a device and run code on a targeted system.

    The OAS platform is widely used by a range of industrial enterprises, essentially facilitating the transfer of data within an IT environment between hardware and software and playing a central role in organizations' industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) efforts. It touches a range of devices, including PLCs and OPCs and IoT devices, as well as custom applications and APIs, databases and edge systems.

    Companies like Volvo, General Dynamics, JBT Aerotech and wind-turbine maker AES are among the users of the OAS platform.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022