Australia probes app stores, politely suggests Apple and Google could try being nicer and more careful

Down Under watchdog doesn't call for commission cuts nor suggest major interventions


Australia’s Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has decided that Apple and Google have a duopoly on mobile operating systems and probably harm third-party developers ... but has proposed only modest changes to the operations as remedies.

In an interim report, pulled together after Australia last year probed whether Apple’s and Google’s app stores hurt consumers and hindered competition, the ACCC found that the two tech giants have significant market power, and may be abusing it by promoting their own apps in search results over the competition and installing the software as defaults.

“A number of Apple and Google’s own apps clearly benefit from being pre-installed or set as defaults and/or having superior integration with the relevant OS,” the report, published this week, states. “Pre-installation and defaults may entrench market power, limit consumer choice, and reduce potential for innovation in the downstream markets in which they compete.”

The document is very critical of Apple and Google for allowing malicious apps onto their software stores. While the ACCC finds that the app store review process is a good filter for obviously dodgy apps, the report finds that applications that employ “dark patterns” to lure users into unintended spending are plentiful, and that both app store operators seem to ignore complaints present in online reviews.

Another observation: "Apple and Google have superior access to information about the entire app ecosystem and its users, which enables them to monitor the performance of all apps and hence gain valuable competitive insights. There are potential competition concerns arising from Apple and Google’s intelligence gathering given that their own first-party apps compete with thirdparty apps in downstream app markets."

The document also notes the dispute between Epic Games and Apple over in-app purchasing but finds Apple and Google’s 30 per cent commission is a cost-recovery mechanism that funds the development of their operating systems and operation of their app stores. The report says that commissions are probably inflated, but as OS development doesn’t directly generate revenue for either Google or Apple, enforcing reduced commissions may not be desirable.

While the review voices many concerns, it suggested just six “potential measures,” as follows:

  • Giving users the power to choose default apps;
  • Ring-fencing data derived from app stores from other operations at Google and Apple, so that their status as market operators doesn’t offer them advantages in other fields;
  • Better monitoring of apps after review, to stop malicious apps;
  • App marketplaces allowing developers to explain alternative payment options to users in their apps, and offering consumers more information about those options;
  • Requiring more transparency on algorithms that determine app visibility in marketplaces – but not so much transparency that gaming those algorithms becomes prevalent;
  • Allowing users to review apps from Google and Apple.

The less-than-savage nature of those measures may be explained by another observation in the report: a distinction between competition between mobile ecosystems (Apple vs. Google) and competition within mobile ecosystems (Apple or Google making life hard for third-party developers). The document says regulation must “ensure that any measures proposed to increase competition within mobile ecosystems do not lessen competition between mobile ecosystems.”

The report is now on government ministers’ desks and is unlikely to result in swift action, as Australia’s budget is in two weeks, and changes to app store regulations are almost certainly not seen as the kind of post-pandemic economic recovery stimulus or reform the nation’s government is already teasing.

Yet ACCC chair Rod Sims pointed out that legislation remains a future option, so Google and Apple should read the report closely.

“There is a window of opportunity for Apple and Google themselves to take steps to improve outcomes for app developers and consumers by adopting the potential measures we have identified,” Sims said. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022