If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all: El Reg takes Twitter's anti-mean algorithm for a spin

We're nicer in person, we swear

In an attempt to make Twitter feel less like a small-town Wetherspoons at closing time, the company will start asking users to reconsider sending tweets its algorithms perceive to be mean.

The next time you craft an acerbic reply to a stranger, the Twitter iOS and Android apps will ask: "Want to review this before tweeting?"

Tweets are run through an algorithm designed to filter out "insults, strong language, or hateful remarks" with would-be broadcasters of hateful remarks prompted to edit or delete their post before sending it. Users can also opt to ignore Twitter's intervention and send the tweet in its original form.

According to Twitter, the feature has been in testing since last year, and has produced some measurable results. The company claimed that 34 per cent of those issued a warning opted to review or delete their reply. It also said that, once prompted, users sent 11 per cent fewer mean tweets going forwards.

Obviously, we're not going to take Twitter's word for it. And so, one fateful Thursday afternoon, your humble hack sent a call-out to his nearly 8,000 Twitter followers asking for volunteers willing to receive a verbal tongue lashing.

"Hey! I need to tweet mean things to people for an article I'm working on," I wrote. "If you don't mind me writing something slightly cruel to you, reply to this tweet."

Nearly 50 brave souls volunteered within the first hour. And thus commenced an amusing, albeit potentially career-limiting, experiment in stress-testing Twitter's content moderation algorithms.

All's fair in love and tweet-fare

Of course, it figures that the first people to reply were those I'd either worked for, worked with, or simply respect on a professional and personal level.

Kevin Raposo, editor of gadget site KnowTechie, stuck his head above the parapet, only to be informed that he "looks like Vanilla Ice, if Vanilla Ice had the Benjamin Button disease." I told journo Alex Wilhelm his writing was akin to taking Valium.

And then it was the turn of Boris Veldhuijzen Van Zanten, my former boss at Dutch tech blog The Next Web.

"You're such a massive dipshit, you should rename your company The Next Pleb," I said.

It was a strong start. Twitter said nothing, although I quickly realised that was my fault. I'd been using the web view, rather than the iOS app.

The experiment continued. I took out my phone and searched for my next victim. Eric McMahon, a hirsute church pastor from Philadelphia, was told his beard resembled something found in a discarded grumble mag from the 1970s. He did not reply.

I asked if redheaded games journo Liz Finnegan was embalmed, or just really pale. I instructed Drew Olanoff, another writer, to perform an obscene act with a mallard. I described PR people as "sociopaths" and "pointless".

The app said naught. Could it be that my insults were so esoteric and contrived, they simply sailed past Twitter’s content filters? Or could it be that I'm just so bad at internet smack talk, it simply deemed my insults as unworthy of intervention? Truthfully, dear reader, I have no idea.

But as someone who has been on Twitter for a long time, I can't fault the intention behind the move. It's a horrible, toxic, draining place. Social media in general has a tendency to make strangers feel remote and abstract. They aren't people, but rather pixels on a screen, and thus it's easier to tweet things you wouldn't dare say to their faces.

Of course, policing a site with hundreds of millions of users is a task of herculean proportions, and an algorithm can only go so far. The only cure is deleting the damn app from your phone.

The real world isn't perfect, certainly, but it's a bit nicer. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Employers in denial over success of digital skills training, say exasperated staffers

    Large disparities in views from bosses vs workers on 'talent transformation initiatives,' says survey

    Digital transformation projects are being held back by a lack of skills, according to a new survey, which finds that while many employers believe they are doing well at training up existing staff to meet the requirements, their employees beg to differ.

    Skills shortages are nothing new, but the Talent Transformation Global Impact report from research firm Ipsos on behalf of online learning provider Udacity indicates that although digital transformation initiatives are stalling due to a lack of digital talent, enterprises are becoming increasingly out of touch with what their employees need to fill the skills gap.

    The report is the result of two surveys taking in over 2,000 managers and more than 4,000 employees across the US, UK, France, and Germany. It found that 59 per cent of employers state that not having enough skilled employees is having a major or moderate impact on their business.

    Continue reading
  • Saved by the Bill: What if... Microsoft had killed Windows 95?

    Now this looks like a job for me, 'cos we need a little, controversy... 'Cos it feels so NT, without me

    Former Microsoft veep Brad Silverberg has paid tribute to Bill Gates for saving Windows 95.

    Silverberg posted his comment in a Twitter exchange started by Fast co-founder Allison Barr Allen regarding somebody who'd changed your life. Silverberg responded "Bill Gates" and, in response to a question from Microsoft cybersecurity pro Ashanka Iddya, explained Gates's role in Windows 95's survival.

    Continue reading
  • UK government opens consultation on medic-style register for Brit infosec pros

    Are you competent? Ethical? Welcome to UKCSC's new list

    Frustrated at lack of activity from the "standard setting" UK Cyber Security Council, the government wants to pass new laws making it into the statutory regulator of the UK infosec trade.

    Government plans, quietly announced in a consultation document issued last week, include a formal register of infosec practitioners – meaning security specialists could be struck off or barred from working if they don't meet "competence and ethical requirements."

    The proposed setup sounds very similar to the General Medical Council and its register of doctors allowed to practice medicine in the UK.

    Continue reading
  • Microsoft's do-it-all IDE Visual Studio 2022 came out late last year. How good is it really?

    Top request from devs? A Linux version

    Review Visual Studio goes back a long way. Microsoft always had its own programming languages and tools, beginning with Microsoft Basic in 1975 and Microsoft C 1.0 in 1983.

    The Visual Studio idea came from two main sources. In the early days, Windows applications were coded and compiled using MS-DOS, and there was a MS-DOS IDE called Programmer's Workbench (PWB, first released 1989). The company also came up Visual Basic (VB, first released 1991), which unlike Microsoft C++ had a Windows IDE. Perhaps inspired by VB, Microsoft delivered Visual C++ 1.0 in 1993, replacing the little-used PWB. Visual Studio itself was introduced in 1997, though it was more of a bundle of different Windows development tools initially. The first Visual Studio to integrate C++ and Visual Basic (in .NET guise) development into the same IDE was Visual Studio .NET in 2002, 20 years ago, and this perhaps is the true ancestor of today's IDE.

    A big change in VS 2022, released November, is that it is the first version where the IDE itself runs as a 64-bit process. The advantage is that it has access to more than 4GB memory in the devenv process, this being the shell of the IDE, though of course it is still possible to compile 32-bit applications. The main benefit is for large solutions comprising hundreds of projects. Although a substantial change, it is transparent to developers and from what we can tell, has been a beneficial change.

    Continue reading
  • James Webb Space Telescope has arrived at its new home – an orbit almost a million miles from Earth

    Funnily enough, that's where we want to be right now, too

    The James Webb Space Telescope, the largest and most complex space observatory built by NASA, has reached its final destination: L2, the second Sun-Earth Lagrange point, an orbit located about a million miles away.

    Mission control sent instructions to fire the telescope's thrusters at 1400 EST (1900 UTC) on Monday. The small boost increased its speed by about 3.6 miles per hour to send it to L2, where it will orbit the Sun in line with Earth for the foreseeable future. It takes about 180 days to complete an L2 orbit, Amber Straughn, deputy project scientist for Webb Science Communications at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, said during a live briefing.

    "Webb, welcome home!" blurted NASA's Administrator Bill Nelson. "Congratulations to the team for all of their hard work ensuring Webb's safe arrival at L2 today. We're one step closer to uncovering the mysteries of the universe. And I can't wait to see Webb's first new views of the universe this summer."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022