Dealing with the pandemic by drinking and swearing? Boffins say you're not alone

While social media gets a portion of the blame for COVID-19's initial spread

The impact of lockdowns during a global pandemic appears to be making itself known in a variety of ways – subtle and otherwise – including increased drinking and swearing. Or, as we like to call it, "the weekend".

There's no denying that the pandemic has been tough, and the IT industry was far from immune. We've seen numerous events cancelled, supply chain issues and the joys of looking terrible on camera – and those were all in the first three months.

How did we react? Well, we drank. And swore.

At least, that's the conclusion which can be drawn from studies undertaken, beginning with a paper from researchers at Flinders University, who have directly tied the lockdowns in the UK and Australia to an increase in drinking – among middle-aged women, at least.

"We found those that were struggling to get through the COVID-19 lockdowns in both Australia and the UK increased their drinking and those same negative feelings led people to buy more alcohol as well," said Dr. Emma Miller.

"Previous research of ours has also shown women shift their perception from long-term uncertainties, such as the dangers of alcohol, to refocus on the more pressing need to 'get through' the pandemic – deciding that what they perceive as short-term benefits, outweigh the long-term health risks."

A separate poll carried out by the University of Michigan, meanwhile, found the pandemic had increased drinking in both men and women over the age of 50 with between a third and a half of those who admitted to routine drinking 'fessing up to having increased their intake in the first ten months of the pandemic.

"While not every older adult who drank more during the past year may have gone from non-risky to risky drinking, the overall level of drinking, and the potential for interaction with other substances, is very concerning," Dr. Anne Fernandez, a psychologist specialising in alcohol use, said of the responses. "As we all toast the end of the worst part of the pandemic in our country, it's important to address or prevent problematic drinking of all kinds."

The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) may have stumbled upon another way we're dealing with the stress of lockdown: swearing. In a survey which looked at everything from, and we quote verbatim from the presentation deck, "the difference between strong language ('f**k', 'motherf**ker') and very strong language ('c**t')" to the use of bleep-censorship in broadcast media, the organisation discovered that a full third of respondents found themselves using more strong language than they did five years ago.

The study also indicated that six in ten use strong language daily, nearly half of Gen Z respondents use strong language daily compared with one in ten of apparently more mature respondents aged between 55 and 64, and that only 61 per cent bother to rein in their language in the presence of children.

One thing that almost certainly hasn't helped matters is social media, with researchers at York University and the University of British Columbia having reported that social media use is one of four factors related to the spread of COVID-19 in the pandemic's early stages – thanks to its use for organising meet-ups where the virus could happily spread.

"What we found was surprising, that the use of social media to organise off-line action tended to be associated with a higher spread rate of COVID-19," York University Assistant Professor Jude Kong explained. "This highlights the need to consider the dynamic role that social media plays in epidemics."

In short: you're not alone if you're drinking and swearing your way through the pandemic, but maybe take a break from the socials to do so. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022