India's IT minister angry that Twitter broke local law by following US law

Brief account shutdown due to DMCA request interpreted as sign of avian network’s lawless intentions


The Indian government’s dispute with Twitter took a new turn over the weekend with Information Technology minister Ravi Shankar Prasad accusing the micro-blogging service of breaking Indian law by following US law.

Shankar, whose portfolio includes Law & Justice, Communications, Electronics & IT, made the argument that Twitter was again flouting Indian law after his account was briefly locked when the avian network acted on a complaint about copyrighted material appearing in the minister’s feed.

Shankar pointed out that India’s new Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code requires operators like Twitter to advise users before their accounts are shut down. The minister also claimed he has never received a complaint about his inclusion of TV news clips in his feed and interpreted Twitter’s actions as follows:

Shankar offered no evidence for his assertions about Twitter’s motives and did not note that the micro-blogging service is headquartered in the USA and therefore bound to observe American law as well as the laws of other nations in which it operates.

The minister’s account was restored in under an hour, and there is no indication that Twitter responded to Prasad’s ire.

India’s government and Twitter have been beefing over the Code, which among other things requires social networks to appoint local officers who handle content takedown requests and act as a point of contact for other grievances.

Twitter missed the deadline to name those officers, then named its US office and a local law firm as its appointed contacts rather than naming local employees into the roles.

India’s government considered that response to be disingenuous and cranked up the pressure on Twitter to comply, but Twitter has declined to do so. The service currently faces legal action brought by Indian States and private individuals over its recent decision to either allow circulation of some material or block it. Defending those actions may be hard, as Twitter’s non-compliance with the Code means it may have lost a legal shield that absolves it from liability for illegal content posted by its users. Minister Prasad has alluded to Twitter losing that protection, but the paperwork making it official is yet to emerge.

Now it appears that Twitter is headed for more trouble as Indian media report that Twitter’s temporary grievance officer has quit the role.

If correct, that leaves Twitter on the wrong side of both the spirit and letter of the Code. And probably ripe for further ministerial kicking. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022