Lockdown-induced gadgetry rush sent Dixons Carphone's online sales skywards – and repaid £73m of furlough wages

But mobile biz continues to wane

The boss of Dixons Carphone has delivered a bullish assessment of the UK retailer's performance in a year when online tech sales spiked and revenues from its ebbing mobile business continued to slide.

Publishing results [PDF] for the year ended 1 May, Dixons reported that revenues across the group topped out at £10.344bn – up a smidgen (2 per cent) on the year before.

And when all the cash was added up, the retailer was able to report pre-tax profits of £33m – an improvement on the £140m loss from fiscal '20.

The retailer was also keen to point to the 103 per cent jump to £4.7bn in online sales which helped its profit and loss accounts return to the black as people sat at home and hit the web to get their electronics fix during lockdown.

Dixons said it saw growth in every major product category with tech singled out as the "standout performer" as people adjusted to home working, home schooling, and keeping themselves entertained as best they could.

Unfortunately, for every "standout performer", there are some parts of the business that failed to shine.

Sales at its UK and Ireland mobile operation dived 55 per cent as it continues to rejig its business, shutter its small standalone Carphone Warehouse UK stores, and close its airport-based outlets with the loss of some 400 jobs.

In good news for taxpayers, the company said it had repaid £73m of furlough wages for staff in the UK and Ireland, and settled its £144m VAT deferral.

In a statement, chief exec Alex Baldock said the last year had seen the retailer "grow [its] online business and add it to our in-store strengths."

"We're now financially stronger too, allowing us to pay back over £200m to governments and to recommence our dividend." ®

Other stories you might like

  • Venezuelan cardiologist charged with designing and selling ransomware
    If his surgery was as bad as his opsec, this chap has caused a lot of trouble

    The US Attorney’s Office has charged a 55-year-old cardiologist with creating and selling ransomware and profiting from revenue-share agreements with criminals who deployed his product.

    A complaint [PDF] filed on May 16th in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleges that Moises Luis Zagala Gonzalez – aka “Nosophoros,” “Aesculapius” and “Nebuchadnezzar” – created a ransomware builder known as “Thanos”, and ransomware named “Jigsaw v. 2”.

    The self-taught coder and qualified cardiologist advertised the ransomware in dark corners of the web, then licensed it ransomware to crooks for either $500 or $800 a month. He also ran an affiliate network that offered the chance to run Thanos to build custom ransomware, in return for a share of profits.

    Continue reading
  • China reveals its top five sources of online fraud
    'Brushing' tops the list, as quantity of forbidden content continue to rise

    China’s Ministry of Public Security has revealed the five most prevalent types of fraud perpetrated online or by phone.

    The e-commerce scam known as “brushing” topped the list and accounted for around a third of all internet fraud activity in China. Brushing sees victims lured into making payment for goods that may not be delivered, or are only delivered after buyers are asked to perform several other online tasks that may include downloading dodgy apps and/or establishing e-commerce profiles. Victims can find themselves being asked to pay more than the original price for goods, or denied promised rebates.

    Brushing has also seen e-commerce providers send victims small items they never ordered, using profiles victims did not create or control. Dodgy vendors use that tactic to then write themselves glowing product reviews that increase their visibility on marketplace platforms.

    Continue reading
  • Oracle really does owe HPE $3b after Supreme Court snub
    Appeal petition as doomed as the Itanic chips at the heart of decade-long drama

    The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Oracle's appeal to overturn a ruling ordering the IT giant to pay $3 billion in damages for violating a decades-old contract agreement.

    In June 2011, back when HPE had not yet split from HP, the biz sued Oracle for refusing to add Itanium support to its database software. HP alleged Big Red had violated a contract agreement by not doing so, though Oracle claimed it explicitly refused requests to support Intel's Itanium processors at the time.

    A lengthy legal battle ensued. Oracle was ordered to cough up $3 billion in damages in a jury trial, and appealed the decision all the way to the highest judges in America. Now, the Supreme Court has declined its petition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022