Report shines light on REvil's depressingly simple tactics: Phishing, credential-stuffing RDP servers... the usual

And those multimillion-dollar payouts

Palo Alto Networks' global threat intelligence team, Unit 42, has detailed the tactics ransomware group REvil has employed to great impact so far this year – along with an estimation of the multimillion-dollar payouts it's receiving.

REvil, also known as "Ransomware Evil" or "Sodinokibi," first hit the cybersecurity scene while working in partnership with a group called GandCrab. Initially it operated like many other ransomware outfits, distributing malicious code through faked adverts and trojan horse downloads – but it soon stepped up its game.

The group, which provides what security wonks have come to term "Ransomware as a Service" or RAAS, has been fingered in some high-profile attacks: Travelex, an entertainment-focused law firm with an A-lister client base; Apple supplier Quanta Computer; a major meat producer; a nuclear weapons contractor; and fashion giant French Connection UK – among many others.

REvil threat actors often encrypted the environment within seven days of the initial compromise. However, in some instances, [they] waited up to 23 days....

Most recently, the group gained access to an estimated 1,500 companies through the Kayesa VSA platform. While the company denied a supply-chain attack, it disabled its Saas platform as a security measure – and, as of this morning, was struggling to recover.

"[REvil] is now among an elite group of cyber extortion gangs that are responsible for the surge in debilitating attacks that have made ransomware among the most pressing security threats to businesses and nations around the globe. This criminal group provides adaptable encryptors and decryptors, infrastructure and services for negotiation communications, and a leak site for publishing stolen data when victims don't pay the ransom demand," claimed John Martineau, principal consultant at Unit 42, in a summary of what he has learned in three years of tracking REvil.

"For these services, REvil takes a percentage of the negotiated ransom price as their fee. Affiliates of REvil often use two approaches to persuade victims into paying up: they encrypt data so that organizations cannot access information, use critical computer systems or restore from backups, and they also steal data and threaten to post it on a leak site (a tactic known as double extortion)."

According to research carried out by Martineau and colleagues, REvil and its affiliates averaged $2.25m in payouts per breach over the first six months of 2021 – chickenfeed compared to the $70m the group is demanding for a universal decryption tool designed to unlock the data being ransomed as a result of the Kaseya attack.

The methods chosen by the group to gain access to the target systems are depressingly simple, Martineau's report claimed, with the most common methods being as simple as sending a phishing message or attempting to log in to Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) servers using previously-compromised credentials.

"However," Martineau noted, "we also observed a few unique vectors that relate to the recent Microsoft Exchange Server CVEs, as well as a case that involved a SonicWall compromise."

Once in, REvil attackers cement their access by creating new local and domain user accounts, install Cobalt Strike's Beacon covert payload – a commercial product which apparently delivers a little too well on its promise to "model advanced attackers" for "threat emulation" – and disable antivirus, security services, and other protection systems. The impact is further expanded to other devices on the network, using "various open-source tools to gather intelligence on a victim environment."

It could be a while before the attack is noticed, too – no surprise given how the group often exfiltrates gigabytes of data as part of its ransom approach. "REvil threat actors often encrypted the environment within seven days of the initial compromise," Martineau found. "However, in some instances, the threat actor(s) waited up to 23 days. [They] often used MEGASync software or navigated to the MEGASync website to exfiltrate archived data. In one instance, the threat actor used RCLONE to exfiltrate data.

"As we draw closer to a post COVID-19 environment, IT and other defenders of networks should take time to learn what's normal in their environments and notice and question abnormalities," Martineau concluded. "Investigate them. Question your defences.

"Do all users need to be able to open macro-enabled documents? Do you have endpoint visibility and protections to, at minimum, alert you to secondary infections such as QakBot? If you absolutely need RDP, are you using tokenised MFA? And don't question just once – question routinely. Think like the attacker. You might be able to stop your organisation from being the next victim and escape being in the headlines for the wrong reasons."

"All attacks seem to involve a phishing email along the way, but that is because they are so successful and are not slowing down," Jake Moore, cybersecurity expert at ESET UK, told The Register of the report's findings. "RDP attacks are also on the rise, due to previously compromised credentials, making protection an ever more challenging task.

"No one is 100 per cent safe, but routinely questioning abnormalities will no doubt help secure organisations. However, at the same time it also adds more work for those infosec individuals in charge – making for a more labour-intensive industry."

The full report has been published on the Unit 42 site. ®

Broader topics

Narrower topics

Other stories you might like

  • GPL legal battle: Vizio told by judge it will have to answer breach-of-contract claims
    Fine-print crucially deemed contractual agreement as well as copyright license in smartTV source-code case

    The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) has won a significant legal victory in its ongoing effort to force Vizio to publish the source code of its SmartCast TV software, which is said to contain GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 copyleft-licensed components.

    SFC sued Vizio, claiming it was in breach of contract by failing to obey the terms of the GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 licenses that require source code to be made public when certain conditions are met, and sought declaratory relief on behalf of Vizio TV owners. SFC wanted its breach-of-contract arguments to be heard by the Orange County Superior Court in California, though Vizio kicked the matter up to the district court level in central California where it hoped to avoid the contract issue and defend its corner using just federal copyright law.

    On Friday, Federal District Judge Josephine Staton sided with SFC and granted its motion to send its lawsuit back to superior court. To do so, Judge Staton had to decide whether or not the federal Copyright Act preempted the SFC's breach-of-contract allegations; in the end, she decided it didn't.

    Continue reading
  • US brings first-of-its-kind criminal charges of Bitcoin-based sanctions-busting
    Citizen allegedly moved $10m-plus in BTC into banned nation

    US prosecutors have accused an American citizen of illegally funneling more than $10 million in Bitcoin into an economically sanctioned country.

    It's said the resulting criminal charges of sanctions busting through the use of cryptocurrency are the first of their kind to be brought in the US.

    Under the United States' International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEA), it is illegal for a citizen or institution within the US to transfer funds, directly or indirectly, to a sanctioned country, such as Iran, Cuba, North Korea, or Russia. If there is evidence the IEEA was willfully violated, a criminal case should follow. If an individual or financial exchange was unwittingly involved in evading sanctions, they may be subject to civil action. 

    Continue reading
  • Meta hires network chip guru from Intel: What does this mean for future silicon?
    Why be a customer when you can develop your own custom semiconductors

    Analysis Here's something that should raise eyebrows in the datacenter world: Facebook parent company Meta has hired a veteran networking chip engineer from Intel to lead silicon design efforts in the internet giant's infrastructure hardware engineering group.

    Jon Dama started as director of silicon in May for Meta's infrastructure hardware group, a role that has him "responsible for several design teams innovating the datacenter for scale," according to his LinkedIn profile. In a blurb, Dama indicated that a team is already in place at Meta, and he hopes to "scale the next several doublings of data processing" with them.

    Though we couldn't confirm it, we think it's likely that Dama is reporting to Alexis Bjorlin, Meta's vice president of infrastructure hardware who previously worked with Dama when she was general manager of Intel's Connectivity group before serving a two-year stint at Broadcom.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022