Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Twitter U-turns after conferring society's highest honor – a blue check mark – on very obvious bot accounts

Inside job? Human error? Social network says it made a mistake

Twitter verified a bunch of bot accounts, granting them coveted blue check marks, and then reversed the decision, admitting it made a mistake.

The debacle swung the spotlight on the social network's system for verifying accounts, which is normally reserved for qualifying celebs, politicians, sports stars, experts, journos, and similar netizens.

A tweeter going by the handle Conspirador Norteño, who claims to fight online disinformation, found that none of the six accounts in question, created in June, had actually posted any tweets and that, for each of them, their thousand or so followers were largely the same accounts. Yet, the sextet had been verified as supposedly authentic and notable people by Twitter when they were anything but.

It all points to a network of fake users likely intended to boost particular issues or campaigns on Twitter using their special status.

"These six newly created verified accounts have 977 followers in common. One is @verified (which follows all blue-check verified accounts). The other 976 were all created on June 19th or June 20th, 2021, and all follow the same 190 accounts," Norteño tweeted on Sunday.

"These 976 accounts are part of an astroturf botnet consisting of (at least) 1,212 accounts.

"The network is split into followers, which follow the aforementioned verified accounts as well as other members of the botnet, and followees, which are followed by the other bots."

To add to the mystery, this network of fake accounts used profile pictures seemingly created by AI software: a generative adversarial network was likely behind at least some of the photos and illustrations of women and cats used as avatars. These unique images won't show up in reverse-image searches in Google or TinEye, making them more believable. If the pics were stolen from people's Instagram profiles, for instance, it would be too obvious they were bogus.

All six verified accounts have been shut down, and the rest of the network doesn't seem to be fully active, with some members tweeting stuff about Korean websites. Norteño said one verified account had self-terminated and the rest were pulled by the social network.

"We mistakenly approved the verification applications of a small number of inauthentic (fake) accounts," a spokesperson for Twitter told The Register on Monday. "We have now permanently suspended the accounts in question, and removed their verified badge, under our platform manipulation and spam policy."

Twitter also confirmed to The Reg what some suspected: when you apply for a verified account, you go into a queue for your particular region, and each region queue is handled separately. Thus, compared to others, some regions may be too quick, shall we say, to approve the accounts in their queues, meaning some people get verified when they shouldn't. The verified accounts in question all appeared to use the Turkish language, we note.

Alex Stamos, Facebook's former head of security, earlier speculated Twitter "might have a malicious or bribed insider," adding that "something similar happened" at Facebook-owned Instagram, in which spammers bought verified badges for their accounts. ®

More about

More about

More about

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like