UK celebrates 25 years of wasteful, 'underperforming' government IT projects

National Audit Office's scathing report blames fails on lack of experience


Government IT projects are poorly thought out, often fail to achieve what they're designed to do, and are a waste of taxpayers' money.

Or so the UK's National Audit Office (NAO) has said in a report that lays bare frailties and failures that are so commonplace that few tech pros are likely to be surprised.

The report said the UK has little chance of turning things around because public sector failures are so widespread and deep-rooted, with too few senior government officials armed with the experience and skills to run such schemes.

"Despite 25 years of government strategies and countless attempts to deliver digital business change successfully, our reports show a consistent pattern of underperformance," wrote the NAO in its report "The challenges in implementing digital change" [PDF].

In a bid to try to understand why government projects are plagued by difficulties, the report said: "This underperformance can often be the result of programmes not being sufficiently thought through before key decisions on technology solutions are made. This means that there is a gap between what government intends to achieve and what it delivers to citizens and service users, which wastes taxpayers' money and delays improvements in public services."

The NAO cites a number of examples where government projects have become a costly embarrassment. This includes the Ministry of Justice's criminal electronic ankle tag project that was five years late, cost taxpayers £60m, and was blasted by MPs as a "catastrophic waste of public money."

In the end, the programme used off-the-shelf leg tags that could have been purchased years before and for a fraction of the price. The government's hapless Emergency Services Network – which is designed to offer a new mobile voice and data network for police, ambulance, and fire services – was also singled out by the NAO for being over budget and overdue.

According to the latest NAO figures, the cost of the project has gone from £6.2bn in 2015 to £9.3bn in 2019 – an increase of £3.1bn with a current completion date that is currently seven years behind schedule. From rolling out energy-monitoring smart meters to IT systems designed to handle payments, almost no part of government escapes criticism. /

"When large digital business change programmes run into difficulty, the technology solution is often cast as the primary reason for failure," said the NAO.

"There is rarely a single, isolated reason which causes critical programmes to fail." But the NAO did point the finger at one area of concern:

Only a small proportion of permanent secretaries and other senior officials have first-hand experience of digital business change and as a result many lack sufficient understanding of the business, technical and delivery risks for which they are responsible. This means that many of the problems stem from the inability of senior decision-makers to engage effectively with the difficult decisions required to implement technology-enabled business change.

Asked whether they thought the criticisms were fair, a government spokesperson told El Reg: "Many of the report's recommendations align with this government's strategy for making the UK the world's leading digital government, building on our recently published Declaration on Government Reform.

"Our new digital, data and technology leaders have already introduced many of these recommendations. These include mandatory reporting on outdated IT systems, driving innovation and digital skills across government and plans for data-sharing across online government platforms." ®


Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022