Google staff who work from home might see pay cut under corporate policy – reports

That spells trouble for up to one in five workers expected to be WFH


Google may push through reductions in pay for employees that sidestep a return to the same office and instead choose to work from home permanently post-pandemic.

Or so says Reuters, which refers to a Work Location Tool that Google gave to staff in June to calculate the potential wage implications of full-time remote working. This is concerning to staff, particularly those who commute long distances.

One Googler – who asked to remain anon for fear of retaliation – had travelled to the Seattle office from a nearby county in pre-pandemic times, but estimated a 10 per cent pay cut.

"It's as high of a pay cut as I got for my most recent promotion. I didn't do all that hard work to get promoted to then take a pay cut," they were quoted as saying.

Indications from Google staffers are that pay could be shaved by as much as 25 per cent for remote workers who leave the San Francisco base and move to Lake Tahoe. In other reported examples, a Googler living in Stamford, Connecticut – an hour from the New York office – would be paid 15 per cent less if they opted to work from home permanently. There is also a 5-10 per cent difference between office and home work in the Seattle and Boston areas.

The Register has asked Google to comment on its worldwide policy and it told us: "Our compensation packages have always been determined by location, and we always pay at the top of the local market based on where an employee works."

It added: "Our new Work Location Tool was developed to help employees make informed decisions about which city or state they work from and any impact on compensation if they choose to relocate or work remotely."

Joanne Frew, partner and UK head of employment within the legal advisory division at DWF Law, said in a statement to us: "With many businesses struggling it is unsurprising that they will be looking for ways to cut costs. However, implementing sweeping pay cuts for homeworkers is not without serious risk. The starting point is the employment contract. If employers wish to implement pay cuts for homeworkers this would constitute a change to terms and conditions, one employees are unlikely to agree to. Employers would need to go through a process to change terms and conditions and could expect to face serious challenges."

She added that employees would argue that home working reduces overheads for their employer, "and if productivity has not diminished a pay cut would seem arbitrary."

Google isn't on the breadline: in calendar Q2 it made an operating profit of $19.36bn, more than three times the $6.383bn it reported in the corresponding quarter a year earlier.

In May, Google CEO Sundar Pichai said he anticipated just one in five employees working from home when life returned to some semblance of normality – amid the lure of free staff meals, on-site gyms, and massage therapies. He reckoned around 60 per cent of staff had chosen to come back.

"Our campuses have been at the heart of our Google community and the majority of our employees still want to be on campus some of the time," he said. "Yet many of us would also enjoy the flexibility of working from home a couple of days a week, spending time in another city for part of the year, or even moving there permanently."

Around one fifth of the workforce would, he added, work permanently from home.

Just weeks ago, Google told staff they can work from home until October after it postponed the scheduled return to the office from mid-September. Some offices are open and staff can choose to go in or steer clear. Before any mass return, however, staff who choose to work from the office will need to be vaccinated.

Facebook has said the same, and Microsoft will require proof of vaccination from teamsters before they can return to campus the office. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Despite 'key' partnership with AWS, Meta taps up Microsoft Azure for AI work
    Someone got Zuck'd

    Meta’s AI business unit set up shop in Microsoft Azure this week and announced a strategic partnership it says will advance PyTorch development on the public cloud.

    The deal [PDF] will see Mark Zuckerberg’s umbrella company deploy machine-learning workloads on thousands of Nvidia GPUs running in Azure. While a win for Microsoft, the partnership calls in to question just how strong Meta’s commitment to Amazon Web Services (AWS) really is.

    Back in those long-gone days of December, Meta named AWS as its “key long-term strategic cloud provider." As part of that, Meta promised that if it bought any companies that used AWS, it would continue to support their use of Amazon's cloud, rather than force them off into its own private datacenters. The pact also included a vow to expand Meta’s consumption of Amazon’s cloud-based compute, storage, database, and security services.

    Continue reading
  • Atos pushes out HPC cloud services based on Nimbix tech
    Moore's Law got you down? Throw everything at the problem! Quantum, AI, cloud...

    IT services biz Atos has introduced a suite of cloud-based high-performance computing (HPC) services, based around technology gained from its purchase of cloud provider Nimbix last year.

    The Nimbix Supercomputing Suite is described by Atos as a set of flexible and secure HPC solutions available as a service. It includes access to HPC, AI, and quantum computing resources, according to the services company.

    In addition to the existing Nimbix HPC products, the updated portfolio includes a new federated supercomputing-as-a-service platform and a dedicated bare-metal service based on Atos BullSequana supercomputer hardware.

    Continue reading
  • In record year for vulnerabilities, Microsoft actually had fewer
    Occasional gaping hole and overprivileged users still blight the Beast of Redmond

    Despite a record number of publicly disclosed security flaws in 2021, Microsoft managed to improve its stats, according to research from BeyondTrust.

    Figures from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) of the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) show last year broke all records for security vulnerabilities. By December, according to pentester Redscan, 18,439 were recorded. That's an average of more than 50 flaws a day.

    However just 1,212 vulnerabilities were reported in Microsoft products last year, said BeyondTrust, a 5 percent drop on the previous year. In addition, critical vulnerabilities in the software (those with a CVSS score of 9 or more) plunged 47 percent, with the drop in Windows Server specifically down 50 percent. There was bad news for Internet Explorer and Edge vulnerabilities, though: they were up 280 percent on the prior year, with 349 flaws spotted in 2021.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022