British defence supplier Ultra Electronics to be sold for £2.6bn to US-controlled firm

UK.gov shrugs at calls for national security intervention


British defence tech specialist Ultra Electronics has been bought for £2.6bn by a US private equity firm, through a wholly owned UK subsidiary that was itself once a proud standalone business.

Ultra's acquisition by Cobham Group plc, owned by US fund Advent International, sees the defence firm's shareholders receive £35 per share – as well as ownership of the critical Royal Navy supplier passing to a foreign entity, albeit one headquartered in an allied country.

Ultra chief exec Simon Pryce praised Cobham in a prepared statement, adding: "The combination will also create a defence electronics business of greater scale, bringing together two businesses with complementary technology, design, engineering and manufacturing capabilities, which we believe will enable the delivery of a broader range of integrated, cost competitive and high performance solutions across a wider range of platforms, benefiting our mutual customers and wider stakeholders."

Strangely low profile despite its position in the defence electronics supply chain, Ultra supplies the Royal Navy with sonobuoys (underwater devices for detecting submarines), full-blown sonar systems for warships and submarines, and various other military electronics as well as aerospace equipment.

A British government spokesman told defence trade news site Shephard Media, when the buyout was first made public: "While this is a commercial matter for the companies involved, we are closely monitoring the transaction."

Foreign mergers and acquisitions have come under increased scrutiny thanks to Chinese acquisitions of companies such as Newport Wafer Fab over the past few years. While the government has made some noises about protecting UK-owned intellectual property from exploitation by Chinese entities, headline-grabbing government powers allowing deals to be cancelled over national security concerns have not, in fact, been used to do so.

Cobham's sale (and subsequent breakup by its new owners) provoked horror in the British establishment as the formerly family-owned firm, which pioneered technologies such as air-to-air refuelling, was scattered. That the remains of Cobham were used to buy up another successful British business hasn't passed unnoticed; a Labour Party shadow minister questioned "the business model of the new owners, and future governance and operational freedoms."

Another British defence supplier due to be bought out by the US is Meggitt, makers of aerospace components and subsystems, as well as military training systems and aids. While the government made noises about potentially intervening in that deal, no action has yet followed.

Much of the intellectual property in these defence businesses is similar to that in the tech industry and has substantial crossovers with it; modern warships increasingly use internal networking setups that would be very familiar to the average Register reader. Designing these technologies and integrating the vast volumes of data they generate is something in which the UK has, historically, been a world leader. Critics say seeing these companies bought by overseas entities and broken up for their IP assets doesn't bode well for Britain's industrial future. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Red Hat Kubernetes security report finds people are the problem
    Puny human brains baffled by K8s complexity, leading to blunder fears

    Kubernetes, despite being widely regarded as an important technology by IT leaders, continues to pose problems for those deploying it. And the problem, apparently, is us.

    The open source container orchestration software, being used or evaluated by 96 per cent of organizations surveyed [PDF] last year by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, has a reputation for complexity.

    Witness the sarcasm: "Kubernetes is so easy to use that a company devoted solely to troubleshooting issues with it has raised $67 million," quipped Corey Quinn, chief cloud economist at IT consultancy The Duckbill Group, in a Twitter post on Monday referencing investment in a startup called Komodor. And the consequences of the software's complication can be seen in the difficulties reported by those using it.

    Continue reading
  • Infosys skips government meeting - and collecting government taxes
    Tax portal wobbles, again

    Services giant Infosys has had a difficult week, with one of its flagship projects wobbling and India's government continuing to pressure it over labor practices.

    The wobbly projext is India's portal for filing Goods and Services Tax returns. According to India’s Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), the IT services giant reported a “technical glitch” that meant auto-populated forms weren't ready for taxpayers. The company was directed to fix it and CBIC was faced with extending due dates for tax payments.

    Continue reading
  • Google keeps legacy G Suite alive and free for personal use
    Phew!

    Google has quietly dropped its demand that users of its free G Suite legacy edition cough up to continue enjoying custom email domains and cloudy productivity tools.

    This story starts in 2006 with the launch of “Google Apps for Your Domain”, a bundle of services that included email, a calendar, Google Talk, and a website building tool. Beta users were offered the service at no cost, complete with the ability to use a custom domain if users let Google handle their MX record.

    The service evolved over the years and added more services, and in 2020 Google rebranded its online productivity offering as “Workspace”. Beta users got most of the updated offerings at no cost.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022