South Korea may ban Apple, Google from forcing store payment systems on app devs

Korean firms also keen to be your Seoul provider, says expert

South Korea is potentially on its way to tweaking its Telecommunications Business Act to stop Apple and Google from taking a cut of in-app purchases after a bill was approved by a committee of its National Assembly.

The bill was put to a vote on Wednesday by the country's legislation and judiciary committee, but it still has to go through a final vote in parliament, pencilled in for Monday.

If it does pass, the tweak to the Act will mean that companies with dominant market positions – like Apple and Google – will not be allowed to require software developers on their platforms to choose their respective app store's payment systems for users to download paid-for apps or make in-app purchases.

The move comes after Google clarified to Korean devs in September last year that they would be required to "use the Google Play payment system when offering in-app purchases of digital goods and pay a certain percentage of the purchase amount as a fee." In a conciliatory tone, it added that the policy was "only relevant for less than 3 per cent of Google Play app developers who... charge users for paid downloads or sell digital goods within the app. Google Play believes that this policy is fair."

We've asked Apple and Google for comment.

Professor Bronwen Dalton at Sydney's University of Technology's business school said of the move: "South Korea Korea's app developer community have long complained about the 30 per cent tariff they have to pay Apple and Google.

"Another issue is that Korean companies are seeking to adopt the same strategy. Like Apple and Google, they also want to build insular ecosystems where their company plays the ... guiding role in hardware, operating systems, payment systems and services.

"If approved, the [amendments to the] Telecommunications Business Act would mean that Korea would be the first such curb [to] these two US players by a major economy and market. Of course Apple and Google are worried that this could pave the way for other countries to do the same. Even losing Korea would mean the loss of a major revenue stream."

Dalton also noted that the passing of the law could also have implications for the development of autonomous vehicles in Korea. Hyundai Motor, Kia, and Hyundai Mobis are in talks with various manufacturers to develop AVs – reportedly calling off talks with Apple in February.

She added: "While the internal combustion engine vehicle industry allowed for some ecosystem monopolies, development costs [for electric] are huge and Korea will have to form collaboration with companies that own other technologies.

"Cooperation with tech giants like Apple will increasingly crucial in the era of EVs and AVs. The [amendment to the] Telecommunications Business Act may mess with Korea's big companies' [ability] to form the strategic partnerships with US technology companies they need to to develop the AV automobile industry."

While criticism has been mounting against the payment methods used by both Google and Apple in lawsuits across the world filed variously by other developers, consumers and governmental enforcers, the companies themselves have defended the revenue generated by their stores, saying they are used to maintain robust software security and pay carriers and other expenses on the platforms. Both Google and Apple have also made moves to lower the payment percentage they take from app users to 15 per cent for smaller developers (defined as those making under $1m annually).

One dev that definitely does not fit into this category, Fortnite maker and Unreal Engine maintainer Epic Games, objected to paying 30 per cent of in-app payments to Google and Apple to the point that in August last year, it violated the big firms' respective Play and App store rules by creating a loophole for players to buy in-game currency without using Cupertino and Mountain View's payment systems, thereby locking them out from taking a share of revenue.

The move resulted in the developer being booted out of both stores, following which it filed two lawsuits against Apple and Google [PDF]. It has alleged in the two suits that both Google and Apple are abusing their dominant positions and claimed anti-competitive practices by both tech giants. The Apple v Epic trial delivered its closing arguments in late May this year (here's The Reg's take) and awaits judgement in Oakland's Federal Court by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. The Google vs Epic case is ongoing.

Google also has proposed class actions from consumers and developers to contend with, as well as enforcement actions from multiple states' attorneys-general, all accusing the company of monopolising the market for distributing apps on Android devices through its Play Store.

A senior director of public policy at Google yesterday told Reuters that "the rushed process hasn't allowed for enough analysis of the negative impact of this legislation on Korean consumers and app developers."

Other critics have claimed the move by legislators in Korea – as with the other antitrust moves around the globe – may have impact on bilateral agreements it has with the States. At any rate, devs in Korea and elsewhere will be listening closely on Monday for the rattle of the key to consumers' online wallets. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Google has more reasons why it doesn't like antitrust law that affects Google
    It'll ruin Gmail, claims web ads giant

    Google has a fresh list of reasons why it opposes tech antitrust legislation making its way through Congress but, like others who've expressed discontent, the ad giant's complaints leave out mention of portions of the proposed law that address said gripes.

    The law bill in question is S.2992, the Senate version of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (AICOA), which is closer than ever to getting votes in the House and Senate, which could see it advanced to President Biden's desk.

    AICOA prohibits tech companies above a certain size from favoring their own products and services over their competitors. It applies to businesses considered "critical trading partners," meaning the company controls access to a platform through which business users reach their customers. Google, Apple, Amazon, and Meta in one way or another seemingly fall under the scope of this US legislation. 

    Continue reading
  • Makers of ad blockers and browser privacy extensions fear the end is near
    Overhaul of Chrome add-ons set for January, Google says it's for all our own good

    Special report Seven months from now, assuming all goes as planned, Google Chrome will drop support for its legacy extension platform, known as Manifest v2 (Mv2). This is significant if you use a browser extension to, for instance, filter out certain kinds of content and safeguard your privacy.

    Google's Chrome Web Store is supposed to stop accepting Mv2 extension submissions sometime this month. As of January 2023, Chrome will stop running extensions created using Mv2, with limited exceptions for enterprise versions of Chrome operating under corporate policy. And by June 2023, even enterprise versions of Chrome will prevent Mv2 extensions from running.

    The anticipated result will be fewer extensions and less innovation, according to several extension developers.

    Continue reading
  • I was fired for blowing the whistle on cult's status in Google unit, says contractor
    The internet giant, a doomsday religious sect, and a lawsuit in Silicon Valley

    A former Google video producer has sued the internet giant alleging he was unfairly fired for blowing the whistle on a religious sect that had all but taken over his business unit. 

    The lawsuit demands a jury trial and financial restitution for "religious discrimination, wrongful termination, retaliation and related causes of action." It alleges Peter Lubbers, director of the Google Developer Studio (GDS) film group in which 34-year-old plaintiff Kevin Lloyd worked, is not only a member of The Fellowship of Friends, the exec was influential in growing the studio into a team that, in essence, funneled money back to the fellowship.

    In his complaint [PDF], filed in a California Superior Court in Silicon Valley, Lloyd lays down a case that he was fired for expressing concerns over the fellowship's influence at Google, specifically in the GDS. When these concerns were reported to a manager, Lloyd was told to drop the issue or risk losing his job, it is claimed. 

    Continue reading
  • UK competition watchdog seeks to make mobile browsers, cloud gaming and payments more competitive
    Investigation could help end WebKit monoculture on iOS devices

    The United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) on Friday said it intends to launch an investigation of Apple's and Google's market power with respect to mobile browsers and cloud gaming, and to take enforcement action against Google for its app store payment practices.

    "When it comes to how people use mobile phones, Apple and Google hold all the cards," said Andrea Coscelli, Chief Executive of the CMA, in a statement. "As good as many of their services and products are, their strong grip on mobile ecosystems allows them to shut out competitors, holding back the British tech sector and limiting choice."

    The decision to open a formal investigation follows the CMA's year-long study of the mobile ecosystem. The competition watchdog's findings have been published in a report that concludes Apple and Google have a duopoly that limits competition.

    Continue reading
  • End of the road for biz living off free G Suite legacy edition
    Firms accustomed to freebies miffed that web giant's largess doesn't last

    After offering free G Suite apps for more than a decade, Google next week plans to discontinue its legacy service – which hasn't been offered to new customers since 2012 – and force business users to transition to a paid subscription for the service's successor, Google Workspace.

    "For businesses, the G Suite legacy free edition will no longer be available after June 27, 2022," Google explains in its support document. "Your account will be automatically transitioned to a paid Google Workspace subscription where we continue to deliver new capabilities to help businesses transform the way they work."

    Small business owners who have relied on the G Suite legacy free edition aren't thrilled that they will have to pay for Workspace or migrate to a rival like Microsoft, which happens to be actively encouraging defectors. As noted by The New York Times on Monday, the approaching deadline has elicited complaints from small firms that bet on Google's cloud productivity apps in the 2006-2012 period and have enjoyed the lack of billing since then.

    Continue reading
  • Google offers $118m to settle gender discrimination lawsuit
    Don't even think about putting LaMDA on the compensation committee

    Google has promised to cough up $118 million to settle a years-long gender-discrimination class-action lawsuit that alleged the internet giant unfairly pays men more than women.

    The case, launched in 2017, was led by three women, Kelly Ellis, Holly Pease, and Kelli Wisuri, who filed a complaint alleging the search giant hires women in lower-paying positions compared to men despite them having the same qualifications. Female staff are also less likely to get promoted, it was claimed.

    Gender discrimination also exists within the same job tier, too, the complaint stated. Google was accused of paying women less than their male counterparts despite them doing the same work. The lawsuit was later upgraded to a class-action status when a fourth woman, Heidi Lamar, joined as a plaintiff. The class is said to cover more than 15,000 people.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022