New Zealand DDoS wave targets banks, post offices, weather forecasters and more

Nobody from government will say a word about who's behind it

Banks and post offices in New Zealand have been hit by a cyber offensive, according to reports, consisting of sustained DDoS attacks against a number of critical online services.

The onslaught appear to be a continuation of distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) blitzes against Vocus, the nation's third-largest ISP, as we reported last week.

The NZ Herald wrote that Kiwibank, ANZ, NZ Post and weather forecaster MetService had all been targeted but appeared to have recovered.

The Government Communications Security Bureau, declined to comment beyond telling the newspaper: "We are aware that malicious cyber actors can follow what is reported publicly, and may change their behaviour based on media reporting of their activity."

Other local media outlets repeated NZ government figures' guarded statements, which did not include the reasons why so many institutions had been targeted for DDoSes.

Local cybersecurity agency NZ-CERT added to the general air of mystery, saying in a statement on its website that it was "aware of a DDoS attack targeting a number of New Zealand organisations. We are monitoring the situation and are working with affected parties where we can."

Back in July, New Zealand formally attributed the malicious activities of APT40 to the Chinese Ministry of State Security, with NZ security minister Andrew Little urging China to end "this type of malicious activity, which undermines global stability and security".

Little was joining the UK and the US in that attribution, which included the infamous Hafnium Microsoft Exchange Server vuln exploitation campaign – and also named industrial espionage operation APT31 as a Chinese state theft campaign.

Research published by FireEye in 2019 into APT40's actions included a list of targeted nation states – and New Zealand was not one of them, though a lot can change in two years.

Current affairs magazine The Diplomat, which focuses on the Asia-Pacific region, characterised Little's attribution as "unusually forthright" while in an interview with the UK's Guardian newspaper foreign minister Nanaia Mahuta warned in May that New Zealand could find itself "in the eye of the storm" if China's cyber cold war with Australia spilled southeast.

The diplomatic silence of New Zealand's establishment on the identity or motivations of such a wide-ranging set of DDoSes over a relatively lengthy period of time could be an indicator that they hope to quietly placate the attacker behind the scenes.

In May, NZ hospitals were targeted with a cyber attack – albeit that was ransomware deployed by common-or-garden extortionists.

While it's not impossible that a non-state actor could have randomly decided to mess about with NZ's digital infrastructure for the lulz, the odds of the current attacker being better resourced than the average botnet-wielding script kiddie seem good, judging by their scale and effect. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • AMD claims its GPUs beat Nvidia on performance per dollar
    * Terms, conditions, hardware specs and software may vary – a lot

    As a slowdown in PC sales brings down prices for graphics cards, AMD is hoping to win over the market's remaining buyers with a bold, new claim that its latest Radeon cards provide better performance for the dollar than Nvidia's most recent GeForce cards.

    In an image tweeted Monday by AMD's top gaming executive, the chip designer claims its lineup of Radeon RX 6000 cards provide better performance per dollar than competing ones from Nvidia, with all but two of the ten cards listed offering advantages in the double-digit percentages. AMD also claims to provide better performance for the power required by each card in all but two of the cards.

    Continue reading
  • Google opens the pod doors on Bay View campus
    A futuristic design won't make people want to come back – just ask Apple

    After nearly a decade of planning and five years of construction, Google is cutting the ribbon on its Bay View campus, the first that Google itself designed.

    The Bay View campus in Mountain View – slated to open this week – consists of two office buildings (one of which, Charleston East, is still under construction), 20 acres of open space, a 1,000-person event center and 240 short-term accommodations for Google employees. The search giant said the buildings at Bay View total 1.1 million square feet. For reference, that's less than half the size of Apple's spaceship. 

    The roofs on the two main buildings, which look like pavilions roofed in sails, were designed that way for a purpose: They're a network of 90,000 scale-like solar panels nicknamed "dragonscales" for their layout and shimmer. By scaling the tiles, Google said the design minimises damage from wind, rain and snow, and the sloped pavilion-like roof improves solar capture by adding additional curves in the roof. 

    Continue reading
  • Pentester pops open Tesla Model 3 using low-cost Bluetooth module
    Anything that uses proximity-based BLE is vulnerable, claim researchers

    Tesla Model 3 and Y owners, beware: the passive entry feature on your vehicle could potentially be hoodwinked by a relay attack, leading to the theft of the flash motor.

    Discovered and demonstrated by researchers at NCC Group, the technique involves relaying the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) signals from a smartphone that has been paired with a Tesla back to the vehicle. Far from simply unlocking the door, this hack lets a miscreant start the car and drive away, too.

    Essentially, what happens is this: the paired smartphone should be physically close by the Tesla to unlock it. NCC's technique involves one gadget near the paired phone, and another gadget near the car. The phone-side gadget relays signals from the phone to the car-side gadget, which forwards them to the vehicle to unlock and start it. This shouldn't normally happen because the phone and car are so far apart. The car has a defense mechanism – based on measuring transmission latency to detect that a paired device is too far away – that ideally prevents relayed signals from working, though this can be defeated by simply cutting the latency of the relay process.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022