T-Systems and Google Cloud building 'sovereign cloud services' for Germany

Sovereign according to Google's definition, that is

Google Cloud and T-Systems are to create what the companies call a "sovereign cloud offering" for Germany, though details are sketchy and it may not be digital sovereignty as the term is normally understood.

The project involves T-Systems playing a role in managing "a large spectrum of next-generation cloud solutions and infrastructure… powered by Google Cloud," the European integrator-cum consultancy said.

What does that mean in practice? Key questions include the physical location both of data and the applications that process that data, and management and control of the software that is running. We've asked the duo to respond.

The service is scheduled to be available by mid-2022, the pair said, and is aimed at German enterprises, public sector and healthcare organisations.

Google Cloud sign on HQ

Google Cloud: suitable for a "sovereign cloud" in Europe?

The Register was also told that: "T-Systems will manage a set of sovereignty controls and measures, including encryption and identity management. In addition, T-Systems will exercise a control function over relevant parts of the German Google Cloud infrastructure. Any physical or virtual access to facilities in Germany (such as routine maintenance and upgrades) will be under the supervision of T-Systems and Google Cloud."

Will some data on occasion be processed outside Germany? What is the scope of T-System's control over the systems? Those things are not clearly stated, but it does say that there will be "full public cloud scale as well as version and feature parity to global network," so what is on offer may be a mini-Google Cloud running entirely in Germany, or some sort of hybrid solution.

Google's EMEA veep Adaire Fox-Martin, appointed in August, said: "T-Systems will operate and independently control key parts of the Google Cloud infrastructure" for its German customers, leaving open the question of whether other "key parts" will not be under such control.

Fox-Martin described the project as "Cloud on Europe's Terms."

That may be a stretch. The French think tank Foundation pour L'Innovation Politique says in its paper on digital sovereignty that the concept was first defined in 2011 by Pierre Bellanger, a French executive, as "control of our present and destiny as manifested and guided by the use of technology and computer networks." Running on systems programmed and controlled by a US corporation is unlikely to conform to that definition.

The EU's paper [PDF] on Digital Sovereignty for Europe talks about "Europe's ability to act independently in the digital world" and criticises "global tech-driven players which do not always obey European rules and fundamental values, and which put data appropriation and valuation at the heart of their strategy" – a description which could well be applied to Google and its advertising business. The paper calls for "investing in digital capacities, infrastructure and technologies" which is unlikely to mean a datacentre or two stuffed with Google software.

Google has its own definition of sovereignty, which as you would expect is more amenable to the cloud giant's approach. It describes data sovereignty as "keep all control over encryption and access to your data"; operational sovereignty as "visibility and control over provider operations"; and software sovereignty as "you can run workloads without dependence on provider's software."

This last point is difficult to unpack. Removing dependence on a provider's software suggests using only open source solutions; but Google Cloud Platform is not open source as a whole, even though it has strong elements of open source, such as the core Kubernetes software in Google Kubernetes Engine, and heavy use of the Linux operating system.

Most Google services though are not entirely open source, and have Google-specific APIs, making avoidance of lock-in challenging.

Sachiko Muto, CEO of Brussels-based think tank OpenForum Europe told us that: "It is a positive sign that companies are adapting their offerings in recognition of the legitimate right of Europe to set its own terms. For users to be sovereign they should also be able to specify terms that are in addition to those defined by the vendor. Where such offerings are also fully open source they enable the user to scrutinize the claims made by the vendor. Open source thus enhances user control and alleviates lock-in.

"There are many definitions of digital sovereignty/independence/autonomy floating around. It would be preferred if the EU clearly adopted a definition and elaborated the principles that support it."

The EU has its own Gaia-X project for a European cloud which is a quite different thing, using federated services and mandated standards to ensure openness. Getting Gaia-X off the ground is hard though, whereas an existing commercial operator like Google can make its systems available immediately.

The T-System/Google project likely does tick some desirable boxes in terms of management and compliance, but it will not tick all of them, nor will it enable the European software industry to keep pace with the US cloud giants in public cloud technology. ®

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • North Korea pulled in $400m in cryptocurrency heists last year – report

    Plus: FIFA 22 players lose their identity and Texas gets phony QR codes

    In brief Thieves operating for the North Korean government made off with almost $400m in digicash last year in a concerted attack to steal and launder as much currency as they could.

    A report from blockchain biz Chainalysis found that attackers were going after investment houses and currency exchanges in a bid to purloin funds and send them back to the Glorious Leader's coffers. They then use mixing software to make masses of micropayments to new wallets, before consolidating them all again into a new account and moving the funds.

    Bitcoin used to be a top target but Ether is now the most stolen currency, say the researchers, accounting for 58 per cent of the funds filched. Bitcoin accounted for just 20 per cent, a fall of more than 50 per cent since 2019 - although part of the reason might be that they are now so valuable people are taking more care with them.

    Continue reading
  • Tesla Full Self-Driving videos prompt California's DMV to rethink policy on accidents

    Plus: AI systems can identify different chess players by their moves and more

    In brief California’s Department of Motor Vehicles said it’s “revisiting” its opinion of whether Tesla’s so-called Full Self-Driving feature needs more oversight after a series of videos demonstrate how the technology can be dangerous.

    “Recent software updates, videos showing dangerous use of that technology, open investigations by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the opinions of other experts in this space,” have made the DMV think twice about Tesla, according to a letter sent to California’s Senator Lena Gonzalez (D-Long Beach), chair of the Senate’s transportation committee, and first reported by the LA Times.

    Tesla isn’t required to report the number of crashes to California’s DMV unlike other self-driving car companies like Waymo or Cruise because it operates at lower levels of autonomy and requires human supervision. But that may change after videos like drivers having to take over to avoid accidentally swerving into pedestrians crossing the road or failing to detect a truck in the middle of the road continue circulating.

    Continue reading
  • Alien life on Super-Earth can survive longer than us due to long-lasting protection from cosmic rays

    Laser experiments show their magnetic fields shielding their surfaces from radiation last longer

    Life on Super-Earths may have more time to develop and evolve, thanks to their long-lasting magnetic fields protecting them against harmful cosmic rays, according to new research published in Science.

    Space is a hazardous environment. Streams of charged particles traveling at very close to the speed of light, ejected from stars and distant galaxies, bombard planets. The intense radiation can strip atmospheres and cause oceans on planetary surfaces to dry up over time, leaving them arid and incapable of supporting habitable life. Cosmic rays, however, are deflected away from Earth, however, since it’s shielded by its magnetic field.

    Now, a team of researchers led by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) believe that Super-Earths - planets that are more massive than Earth but less than Neptune - may have magnetic fields too. Their defensive bubbles, in fact, are estimated to stay intact for longer than the one around Earth, meaning life on their surfaces will have more time to develop and survive.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022