US Congress ponders setting up permanent UFO investigation office

Nothing to do with little green men, mind, unless they can be defined as state or non-state actors


Two intelligence funding appropriation bills currently awaiting approval from the US Congress contain within them sections for the creation of a new office to investigate UFO sightings.

Interest in UFOs – known as UAPs or Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in current US defence parlance – has increased over recent months following the preliminary release of an official US government report on UAP incidents in June this year [PDF].

The report was compiled by a Pentagon-mandated body known as the UAP Task Force after a number of videos featuring US Navy pilots intercepting unidentified objects were leaked in 2017, followed by a New York Times article in December of that year which revealed that the US Department of Defense's secret Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program to investigate UAPs was still running, despite the Pentagon claiming it had been shut down in 2012.

The videos were subsequently officially released in 2020, as shown below, and officially designated as UFOs in 2021.

Youtube Video

The UAP Task Force was duly set up in 2020 to investigate 144 UAP sightings which occurred between 2004 and the present and attempt to determine what, if anything, was going on in each incident.

When the task force delivered its report to Congress in June 2021, it was revealed that the team had only been able to explain away one of the unexplained encounters, which was confirmed to be an errant weather balloon.

Of the remaining 143 incidents, some were thought to be down to "sensor errors, spoofing, or observer misperception and require additional rigorous analysis," but ultimately 80 of them were recorded on multiple sensor platforms and remain unaccounted for.

Thus it is that two intelligence funding bills are currently waiting to be placed before the two respective houses of the US Congress, both containing different sections which would appropriate money for the continued investigation of UAPs.

The appropriations appear to be dedicated mostly to Earthly intelligence matters, however, meaning a full Congressional investigation into the possibility of extraterrestrial visitors is unlikely. Section 1652 of House Bill HR.4350 is dedicated to "Establishment of [an] Office to Address Unidentified Aerial Phenomena." It lays out its duties thus:

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, shall establish an office within the Office of the Secretary of Defense to carry out, on a Department-wide basis, the mission currently performed by the Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

It is extraordinary how governments manage to make even the cool stuff sound incredibly boring.

It proposes to do this by standardising the reporting of such phenomena across the DoD's many branches, while also coordinating reports from across other sections of the US federal government and from the USA's "allies and partners."

But later, paragraphs 4 and 5 explicitly state that the purpose of the proposed office is "evaluating links between unidentified aerial phenomena and adversarial foreign governments, other foreign governments, or nonstate actors" and "evaluating the threat that such incidents present to the United States."

Section 1652 proposes that the new UAP office should deliver a report to Congress once a year for at least the next five years, with the first being delivered not later than the end of 2022.

But it does manage to go just a tiny bit X-Files at the end of explaining what should be in those reports, when it asks for "an update on any efforts underway on the ability to capture or exploit discovered unidentified aerial phenomena", which suggests that even if Area 51 isn't currently a top-secret base full of experimental flying machines, broken UFOs and dead aliens, it soon might be.

The bill does not state whether the public will be able to read any reports delivered to Congress, but the secret squirrel tendencies of the US DoD and intelligence community would suggest not.

Meanwhile, Section 345 of the Senate's S.2610 Bill lays out the basis for permanent establishment of the UAP Task Force responsible for the report from June this year. The two bills disagree on this point, since the House bill specifically states that the Secretary for Defense should establish a new office and terminate the UAP Task Force.

It is presumably not beyond the wit of the assembled Congress to simply make the UAP Task Force the designated office for the coordination of UAP investigation described in the House Bill, or to just rename it. Although the history of US military procurement does not inspire confidence that common sense will necessarily prevail.

Section 345 is otherwise similar in scope to its House counterpart, although it goes into less detail. It suggests the permanent UAP Task Force should give reports to Congress quarterly (rather than annually) and explicitly states that these reports "shall be submitted in classified form". Boooooo!

It is unclear whether a new office specifically tasked with looking into the UFO phenomenon will be established. The two bills involved have yet to be debated by their respective houses and the relevant sections may yet be cut or amended.

But it seems from recent Congressional history that the desire to find out more about UFOs is one of the few things which can elicit genuine bipartisan support, so we live in hope. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Venezuelan cardiologist charged with designing and selling ransomware
    If his surgery was as bad as his opsec, this chap has caused a lot of trouble

    The US Attorney’s Office has charged a 55-year-old cardiologist with creating and selling ransomware and profiting from revenue-share agreements with criminals who deployed his product.

    A complaint [PDF] filed on May 16th in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleges that Moises Luis Zagala Gonzalez – aka “Nosophoros,” “Aesculapius” and “Nebuchadnezzar” – created a ransomware builder known as “Thanos”, and ransomware named “Jigsaw v. 2”.

    The self-taught coder and qualified cardiologist advertised the ransomware in dark corners of the web, then licensed it ransomware to crooks for either $500 or $800 a month. He also ran an affiliate network that offered the chance to run Thanos to build custom ransomware, in return for a share of profits.

    Continue reading
  • China reveals its top five sources of online fraud
    'Brushing' tops the list, as quantity of forbidden content continue to rise

    China’s Ministry of Public Security has revealed the five most prevalent types of fraud perpetrated online or by phone.

    The e-commerce scam known as “brushing” topped the list and accounted for around a third of all internet fraud activity in China. Brushing sees victims lured into making payment for goods that may not be delivered, or are only delivered after buyers are asked to perform several other online tasks that may include downloading dodgy apps and/or establishing e-commerce profiles. Victims can find themselves being asked to pay more than the original price for goods, or denied promised rebates.

    Brushing has also seen e-commerce providers send victims small items they never ordered, using profiles victims did not create or control. Dodgy vendors use that tactic to then write themselves glowing product reviews that increase their visibility on marketplace platforms.

    Continue reading
  • Oracle really does owe HPE $3b after Supreme Court snub
    Appeal petition as doomed as the Itanic chips at the heart of decade-long drama

    The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Oracle's appeal to overturn a ruling ordering the IT giant to pay $3 billion in damages for violating a decades-old contract agreement.

    In June 2011, back when HPE had not yet split from HP, the biz sued Oracle for refusing to add Itanium support to its database software. HP alleged Big Red had violated a contract agreement by not doing so, though Oracle claimed it explicitly refused requests to support Intel's Itanium processors at the time.

    A lengthy legal battle ensued. Oracle was ordered to cough up $3 billion in damages in a jury trial, and appealed the decision all the way to the highest judges in America. Now, the Supreme Court has declined its petition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022