If your head's not in the cloud, you're not in the right place

'Where are the k8s kids?' ask corporates as they can't pay, won't pay

Opinion The tiniest hint of butthurt tinged the Linux Foundation and edX's latest annual Open Source Jobs Report. For the first time, pure Linux skillz were not number one, slipping to second place behind Kubernetes. Container herding is up by 455 per cent, but you just can't get the help.

Getting past the mild sulks that "of course, you need good Linux whatever you do in open source" – calm down, penguinistas, you've already won this war – the real meat of the survey comes from the corporate attitude to recruitment and talent. There has never been an oversupply of good systems and developer bods, in any significant sector of IT, but when you have something growing rapidly and dependent on new technology, the industry seems particularly bad at helping itself.

The lack of Kubernetes on the industry's collective CV is only part of it. Talk to companies who want to play clever in clouds, and the lack of knowledge is pandemic. If you know how to wire together AWS services or fly in the wild blue Azure skies, you will have no shortage of suitors. This isn't going to change any time soon; yes, as advertised, you still need to have those basic chops. You need to build and fix. But the cloud needs you. How do you get those skills?

Let's dismiss some ideas out of hand. Governments often do work hard with good people and non-stupid funding to find ways to encourage IT talent, but it rarely works, especially with this lot who think slogan is a synonym for strategy.

Skills training is often seen as being for people who don't go to uni, and unis are expected to turn out oven-ready workers. Neither fits the reality of corporate IT staffing. Employers say they want talent and employees say they're keen to get trained, but no training happens. That's a combination of the notion that if you're away learning you're not doing the job you were hired for, and the fear that you'll take the training and immediately demand extra pay or bugger off to a better job. Which you wouldn't do if you really liked where you worked, but this idea might as well be written in hieroglyphics in many workplaces.

Even if you can get funded for training and certification, or choose to pay for it yourself, that doesn't work. We know this because there aren't enough people.

And even the autodidacts who first cracked open a command line window at the age of five find it hard picking up the sort of cloud competencies the globe is gagging for.

You can and should install as much of a corporate open-source stack on your own systems as you like, and get to a "Hello, cloud" level, but while that may let you bluff your way in somewhere, you don't want to do that unless you're mad. And there aren't enough people that mad either. The complexity and scale of a proper corporate infrastructure isn't something you can knock up on a couple of Raspberry Pis and a gaming rig.

Let's wave a magic wand and imagine the perfect world for generating top-notch, up-to-date, cloud chief ninjas – and everyone else we need. A proper infrastructure at scale, but one where good pedagogic principles provided pathways for skill acquisition. One that, as should happen in the real world, encouraged cooperation and teamwork in a well-moderated environment. Somewhere systems, components, and documentation were rigorously updated and easily discoverable. A place that rewarded rigour but encouraged experimentation. We might as well make it scalable to automatically adapt to demand, and smart enough to recognise the quality of learners and suggest appropriate choices for each person's abilities and desires.

Now, turn that into a system spec. Build it in the cloud – as it must be built – and design the right mix of services, applications, data flow and automation to implement it on best practice principles. Isn't that exactly what cloud providers sell themselves on all the time?

Forget about needing a business model. This, like all education, should look like the military – it costs what it costs, and you provide it free of charge wherever it's needed. You want the poor black girl in a council block with a Chromebook to come in if they like, as well as the geeky sons of the shires. Of course it should be properly funded, but the whole thing could come out of the marketing budget for any cloud provider. That was one of the secrets of Xerox PARC – it was seen as marketing, and the fact it invented modern computing was splendid advertising.

There are any number of side benefits, apart from providing a system that could be part of any number of ways of training talent. Instrumented, it would give participating companies excellent visibility of how cloud services can be made to interact effectively with a hugely diverse workforce. The grunt work of designing and running the thing will be another goldmine of practical information for product improvement, as well as impeccable internal staff and management training. Talent spotting would be almost automatic, and outreach and PR will flow like honey.

The wilder-eyed among you may already be thinking that this model could be extended beyond teaching how it itself works. In many ways, it has the potential to be a university built on DevOps. Education-as-a-Service. But let's not get ahead of ourselves, let's do that prototype, test, push, and iterate with the aim of getting more people into the heart of the cloud where they can do well by doing good. If the people can't come to the cloud, the cloud must come to the people. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • IT staffing, recruitment biz settles claims it discriminated against Americans
    Foreign workers favored over US residents because that's what clients wanted, allegedly

    Amtex Systems Incorporated, an IT staffing and recruiting firm based in New York City, has agreed to settle claims it discriminated against American workers because company clients wanted workers with temporary visas.

    The US Department of Justice on Wednesday announced the agreement, which followed from a US citizen filing a discrimination complaint with the DoJ's Civil Rights Division’s Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER).

    "IT staffing agencies cannot unlawfully exclude applicants or impose additional burdens because of someone’s citizenship or immigration status," said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, in a statement. "The Civil Rights Division is committed to enforcing the law to ensure that job applicants, including US workers, are protected from unlawful discrimination."

    Continue reading
  • Will this be one of the world's first RISC-V laptops?
    A sneak peek at a notebook that could be revealed this year

    Pic As Apple and Qualcomm push for more Arm adoption in the notebook space, we have come across a photo of what could become one of the world's first laptops to use the open-source RISC-V instruction set architecture.

    In an interview with The Register, Calista Redmond, CEO of RISC-V International, signaled we will see a RISC-V laptop revealed sometime this year as the ISA's governing body works to garner more financial and development support from large companies.

    It turns out Philipp Tomsich, chair of RISC-V International's software committee, dangled a photo of what could likely be the laptop in question earlier this month in front of RISC-V Week attendees in Paris.

    Continue reading
  • Did ID.me hoodwink Americans with IRS facial-recognition tech, senators ask
    Biz tells us: Won't someone please think of the ... fraud we've stopped

    Democrat senators want the FTC to investigate "evidence of deceptive statements" made by ID.me regarding the facial-recognition technology it controversially built for Uncle Sam.

    ID.me made headlines this year when the IRS said US taxpayers would have to enroll in the startup's facial-recognition system to access their tax records in the future. After a public backlash, the IRS reconsidered its plans, and said taxpayers could choose non-biometric methods to verify their identity with the agency online.

    Just before the IRS controversy, ID.me said it uses one-to-one face comparisons. "Our one-to-one face match is comparable to taking a selfie to unlock a smartphone. ID.me does not use one-to-many facial recognition, which is more complex and problematic. Further, privacy is core to our mission and we do not sell the personal information of our users," it said in January.

    Continue reading
  • Meet Wizard Spider, the multimillion-dollar gang behind Conti, Ryuk malware
    Russia-linked crime-as-a-service crew is rich, professional – and investing in R&D

    Analysis Wizard Spider, the Russia-linked crew behind high-profile malware Conti, Ryuk and Trickbot, has grown over the past five years into a multimillion-dollar organization that has built a corporate-like operating model, a year-long study has found.

    In a technical report this week, the folks at Prodaft, which has been tracking the cybercrime gang since 2021, outlined its own findings on Wizard Spider, supplemented by info that leaked about the Conti operation in February after the crooks publicly sided with Russia during the illegal invasion of Ukraine.

    What Prodaft found was a gang sitting on assets worth hundreds of millions of dollars funneled from multiple sophisticated malware variants. Wizard Spider, we're told, runs as a business with a complex network of subgroups and teams that target specific types of software, and has associations with other well-known miscreants, including those behind REvil and Qbot (also known as Qakbot or Pinkslipbot).

    Continue reading
  • Supreme Court urged to halt 'unconstitutional' Texas content-no-moderation law
    Everyone's entitled to a viewpoint but what's your viewpoint on what exactly is and isn't a viewpoint?

    A coalition of advocacy groups on Tuesday asked the US Supreme Court to block Texas' social media law HB 20 after the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals last week lifted a preliminary injunction that had kept it from taking effect.

    The Lone Star State law, which forbids large social media platforms from moderating content that's "lawful-but-awful," as advocacy group the Center for Democracy and Technology puts it, was approved last September by Governor Greg Abbott (R). It was immediately challenged in court and the judge hearing the case imposed a preliminary injunction, preventing the legislation from being enforced, on the basis that the trade groups opposing it – NetChoice and CCIA – were likely to prevail.

    But that injunction was lifted on appeal. That case continues to be litigated, but thanks to the Fifth Circuit, HB 20 can be enforced even as its constitutionality remains in dispute, hence the coalition's application [PDF] this month to the Supreme Court.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022