Q2 2022 should see networking sales boom – when payouts to replace Huawei and ZTE kit start to flow

Netadmins need not assume they can't take a break, as supply chain hassles may persist

How much of a national security risk does the USA think Huawei and ZTE pose?

$1.9 billion worth of risk, according to the nation's Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which has opened its "Supply Chain Reimbursement Program Filing Window" during which carriers can apply for cash in return for kicking the Chinese companies out of their networks.

As explained in the FCC's announcement of the program, the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 saw the US government dangle the dollars to cover "costs incurred in the removal, replacement, and disposal of covered communications equipment or services from their networks that pose a national security risk".

Only ZTE and Huawei kit is held to pose such a threat.

The program is open only to carriers with fewer than ten million customers, and only to carriers that acquired Chinese kit before June 30th, 2020. The FCC definition of eligible entities also includes "schools, libraries or health care providers, or consortiums thereof, to the extent they provide such facilities-based broadband service to end users". Applicants are also required to provide asymmetric services that offer 200kbps or more in one direction. Eligible entities can file their claims between October 29th, 2021, and January 14th, 2022. The FCC will notify successful applicants not long afterwards, then in Q2 2022 will advise of funding allocations.

The Register advises network administrators at eligible carriers to think carefully about when they book holidays: the FCC expects invoices for replacement kit to arrive in Q2 and will start handing out cash at that point. But it would be rash to assume that every piece of kit ordered at that time will arrive, given Cisco's warning that supply chain challenges could persist into Q3, 2022.

It's not often that vendors get a free kick at displacing a rival, so whenever kit is delivered and installed, Cisco and its fellow networking vendors are going to enjoy themselves. A little extra delight could flow from the fact that the FCC is willing to let carriers pay for their new kit in instalments, and receive reimbursement on the same schedule. So networking vendors can spread this windfall out across a few quarters – or perhaps even get some new customers on the subscription treadmill.

Huawei has labelled the program "an unrealistic attempt to fix what isn't broken" and lamented the disruption that network operators will face as they rip and replace kit.

The FCC's info doesn't specify when it wants replacement equipment in place. And of course it omits to mention that the United States' National Security Agency has tampered with Cisco kit to install backdoors – a practice that saw Cisco ship its products to fake identities in the hope that spooks would be left in the dark about the identity of some sensitive customers. But of course spying isn't a national security threat when you're the one doing it. ®

Similar topics

Narrower topics

Other stories you might like

  • GPL legal battle: Vizio told by judge it will have to answer breach-of-contract claims
    Fine-print crucially deemed contractual agreement as well as copyright license in smartTV source-code case

    The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) has won a significant legal victory in its ongoing effort to force Vizio to publish the source code of its SmartCast TV software, which is said to contain GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 copyleft-licensed components.

    SFC sued Vizio, claiming it was in breach of contract by failing to obey the terms of the GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 licenses that require source code to be made public when certain conditions are met, and sought declaratory relief on behalf of Vizio TV owners. SFC wanted its breach-of-contract arguments to be heard by the Orange County Superior Court in California, though Vizio kicked the matter up to the district court level in central California where it hoped to avoid the contract issue and defend its corner using just federal copyright law.

    On Friday, Federal District Judge Josephine Staton sided with SFC and granted its motion to send its lawsuit back to superior court. To do so, Judge Staton had to decide whether or not the federal Copyright Act preempted the SFC's breach-of-contract allegations; in the end, she decided it didn't.

    Continue reading
  • US brings first-of-its-kind criminal charges of Bitcoin-based sanctions-busting
    Citizen allegedly moved $10m-plus in BTC into banned nation

    US prosecutors have accused an American citizen of illegally funneling more than $10 million in Bitcoin into an economically sanctioned country.

    It's said the resulting criminal charges of sanctions busting through the use of cryptocurrency are the first of their kind to be brought in the US.

    Under the United States' International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEA), it is illegal for a citizen or institution within the US to transfer funds, directly or indirectly, to a sanctioned country, such as Iran, Cuba, North Korea, or Russia. If there is evidence the IEEA was willfully violated, a criminal case should follow. If an individual or financial exchange was unwittingly involved in evading sanctions, they may be subject to civil action. 

    Continue reading
  • Meta hires network chip guru from Intel: What does this mean for future silicon?
    Why be a customer when you can develop your own custom semiconductors

    Analysis Here's something that should raise eyebrows in the datacenter world: Facebook parent company Meta has hired a veteran networking chip engineer from Intel to lead silicon design efforts in the internet giant's infrastructure hardware engineering group.

    Jon Dama started as director of silicon in May for Meta's infrastructure hardware group, a role that has him "responsible for several design teams innovating the datacenter for scale," according to his LinkedIn profile. In a blurb, Dama indicated that a team is already in place at Meta, and he hopes to "scale the next several doublings of data processing" with them.

    Though we couldn't confirm it, we think it's likely that Dama is reporting to Alexis Bjorlin, Meta's vice president of infrastructure hardware who previously worked with Dama when she was general manager of Intel's Connectivity group before serving a two-year stint at Broadcom.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022