Android OS vendor variants transmit data with no opt-out

Study finds privacy gaps in Android implementations from Samsung, Xiaomi, Huawei, Realme, and LineageOS


Updated Google Android devices transmit telemetry data while idle, even when users have opted out, according to study conducted earlier this year by Trinity College Dublin computer scientist Douglas Leith.

Handset vendors like Samsung that install proprietary versions of Android on their devices have the opportunity to offer better privacy. But they too gather data without giving users much choice in the matter, the study found.

In a paper PDF] published on Monday, Leith and Dr Paul Patras and Haoyu Liu, both with the University of Edinburgh, examined the data sent by pre-installed system apps in the Android variants installed on Samsung, Xiaomi, Huawei, Realme, LineageOS and /e/OS handsets in Europe.

These include the GApps package (Google Play Services, Google Play store, Google Maps, Youtube, etc.), and system apps that handset vendors install from the likes of Microsoft, LinkedIn, and Facebook.

The boffins from Trinity and Edinburgh universities found that, with the exception of /e/OS, "even when minimally configured and the handset is idle these vendor-customized Android variants transmit substantial amounts of information to the OS developer and also to third-parties."

And, they claim, there's no way to opt-out of this data collection.

Almost nowhere to run to

LineageOS is an open source Android distribution and /e/OS is a fork of LineageOS and Android by French entrepreneur Gaël Duval that's primarily notable for being "Google free."

The Android OS variants from Samsung, Xiaomi, Huawei, and Realme (Oppo) "all transmit a substantial volume of data to the OS developer (i.e. Samsung etc) and to third-party parties that have pre-installed system apps (including Google, Microsoft, Heytap, LinkedIn, Facebook)," the study says.

LineageOS, though distinct from Google's version of Android, sent a similar amount of data to Google, the researchers found, but they didn't observe data going to LineageOS developers or to pre-installed system apps aside from those operated by Google.

/e/OS, according to the boffins, sends no data to Google or third-parties and basically no information to /e/OS developers.

While Leith's research from April showed that Android and iOS devices were found transmitting data like IMEI number, hardware serial number, SIM serial number, phone number, device ids (UDID, Ad ID, RDID, etc), location, telemetry, cookies, local IP address, device Wi-Fi MAC address, handset Bluetooth UniqueChipID, the Secure Element ID (for Apple Pay), and the Wi-Fi MAC addresses of nearby devices, these vendor-customized versions of Android are even more chatty.

The researchers note that Samsung, Xiaomi, Realme and Google all collect hardware device identifiers as well as identifiers that are resettable, ostensibly as a form of privacy protection.

"This means that when a user resets an identifier the new identifier value can be trivially re-linked back to the same device," they explain in their paper. "This largely undermines the use of user-resettable advertising identifiers."

Chart from Android privacy study

Click to enlarge

They further note that multiple parties collect data from each handset, which makes it possible to cross-link the data each party has collected. For example, on the Samsung handset tested, the Google Advertising ID was sent to Samsung servers and several Samsung system apps rely on Google Analytics and Microsoft's OneDrive system app relies on Google's push service.

Similarly concerning is the way some of these vendors collect user interactions. For example, the Xiaomi handset's system app "com.miui.analytics" transmits the details of when app screens were viewed by the Xiaomi user, giving Xiaomi a picture of the timing of user phone calls. And this data gets sent outside of Europe to servers in Singapore.

Microsoft's Swiftkey keyboard on the Huawei handset does similar usage logging.

Missing the point

What's more, all of the handset makers, again with the exception of /e/OS, collect a list of all the apps installed on a handset, which isn't ideal if the app reflects sensitive or controversial interests.

"I think we have completely missed the massive and ongoing data collection by our phones, for which there is no opt out," said Leith in a statement. "We’ve been too focused on web cookies and on badly-behaved apps."

Leith said he hopes the research will help alert the public and lawmakers that action needs to be taken to give people control over the data leaving their phones.

We asked Samsung, Huawei, Xiaomi, Realme, and the e.Foundation for comment but we've not heard back. When The Register asked Google for comment about Leith's related study in April, a company spokesperson suggested phones are supposed to phone home with telemetry data, like modern cars do, to ensure everything is working properly.

This latest study by Leith, Patras, and Liu however argues what these vendor versions of Android are doing goes beyond telemetry that's necessary for phone maintenance.

"Although occasional data transmission to the OS developer to check for updates, etc. is to be expected, as we will see the observed data transmission by the Samsung, Xiaomi, Huawei, Realme and LineageOS Android variants goes well beyond this," the study says.

It also points to /e/OS as an example of privacy done right. "We find that /e/OS collects essentially no data and in that sense is by far the most private of the Android OS variants studied," the study says. ®

Updated to add

In an email to The Register, a spokesperson for LineageOS challenged the paper’s assumption that Google’s system apps come with LineageOS by default.

“The study linked chose to install a third party package (‘opengapps’) on a LineageOS device (per page 6),” the spokesperson said.

“Google Apps are not preinstalled on LineageOS. We have no control over what data is sent by third party applications a user chooses to install, including packages from Google. Those services are neither required nor recommended, and free open source alternatives (such as microG and F-Droid) exist.”


Other stories you might like

  • Lonestar plans to put datacenters in the Moon's lava tubes
    How? Founder tells The Register 'Robots… lots of robots'

    Imagine a future where racks of computer servers hum quietly in darkness below the surface of the Moon.

    Here is where some of the most important data is stored, to be left untouched for as long as can be. The idea sounds like something from science-fiction, but one startup that recently emerged from stealth is trying to turn it into a reality. Lonestar Data Holdings has a unique mission unlike any other cloud provider: to build datacenters on the Moon backing up the world's data.

    "It's inconceivable to me that we are keeping our most precious assets, our knowledge and our data, on Earth, where we're setting off bombs and burning things," Christopher Stott, founder and CEO of Lonestar, told The Register. "We need to put our assets in place off our planet, where we can keep it safe."

    Continue reading
  • Conti: Russian-backed rulers of Costa Rican hacktocracy?
    Also, Chinese IT admin jailed for deleting database, and the NSA promises no more backdoors

    In brief The notorious Russian-aligned Conti ransomware gang has upped the ante in its attack against Costa Rica, threatening to overthrow the government if it doesn't pay a $20 million ransom. 

    Costa Rican president Rodrigo Chaves said that the country is effectively at war with the gang, who in April infiltrated the government's computer systems, gaining a foothold in 27 agencies at various government levels. The US State Department has offered a $15 million reward leading to the capture of Conti's leaders, who it said have made more than $150 million from 1,000+ victims.

    Conti claimed this week that it has insiders in the Costa Rican government, the AP reported, warning that "We are determined to overthrow the government by means of a cyber attack, we have already shown you all the strength and power, you have introduced an emergency." 

    Continue reading
  • China-linked Twisted Panda caught spying on Russian defense R&D
    Because Beijing isn't above covert ops to accomplish its five-year goals

    Chinese cyberspies targeted two Russian defense institutes and possibly another research facility in Belarus, according to Check Point Research.

    The new campaign, dubbed Twisted Panda, is part of a larger, state-sponsored espionage operation that has been ongoing for several months, if not nearly a year, according to the security shop.

    In a technical analysis, the researchers detail the various malicious stages and payloads of the campaign that used sanctions-related phishing emails to attack Russian entities, which are part of the state-owned defense conglomerate Rostec Corporation.

    Continue reading
  • FTC signals crackdown on ed-tech harvesting kid's data
    Trade watchdog, and President, reminds that COPPA can ban ya

    The US Federal Trade Commission on Thursday said it intends to take action against educational technology companies that unlawfully collect data from children using online educational services.

    In a policy statement, the agency said, "Children should not have to needlessly hand over their data and forfeit their privacy in order to do their schoolwork or participate in remote learning, especially given the wide and increasing adoption of ed tech tools."

    The agency says it will scrutinize educational service providers to ensure that they are meeting their legal obligations under COPPA, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.

    Continue reading
  • Mysterious firm seeks to buy majority stake in Arm China
    Chinese joint venture's ousted CEO tries to hang on - who will get control?

    The saga surrounding Arm's joint venture in China just took another intriguing turn: a mysterious firm named Lotcap Group claims it has signed a letter of intent to buy a 51 percent stake in Arm China from existing investors in the country.

    In a Chinese-language press release posted Wednesday, Lotcap said it has formed a subsidiary, Lotcap Fund, to buy a majority stake in the joint venture. However, reporting by one newspaper suggested that the investment firm still needs the approval of one significant investor to gain 51 percent control of Arm China.

    The development comes a couple of weeks after Arm China said that its former CEO, Allen Wu, was refusing once again to step down from his position, despite the company's board voting in late April to replace Wu with two co-chief executives. SoftBank Group, which owns 49 percent of the Chinese venture, has been trying to unentangle Arm China from Wu as the Japanese tech investment giant plans for an initial public offering of the British parent company.

    Continue reading
  • SmartNICs power the cloud, are enterprise datacenters next?
    High pricing, lack of software make smartNICs a tough sell, despite offload potential

    SmartNICs have the potential to accelerate enterprise workloads, but don't expect to see them bring hyperscale-class efficiency to most datacenters anytime soon, ZK Research's Zeus Kerravala told The Register.

    SmartNICs are widely deployed in cloud and hyperscale datacenters as a means to offload input/output (I/O) intensive network, security, and storage operations from the CPU, freeing it up to run revenue generating tenant workloads. Some more advanced chips even offload the hypervisor to further separate the infrastructure management layer from the rest of the server.

    Despite relative success in the cloud and a flurry of innovation from the still-limited vendor SmartNIC ecosystem, including Mellanox (Nvidia), Intel, Marvell, and Xilinx (AMD), Kerravala argues that the use cases for enterprise datacenters are unlikely to resemble those of the major hyperscalers, at least in the near term.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022