There are 875 million good reasons why the paperless office won't happen soon

UK Cabinet Office organises latest print hardware and supplies mega framework


The UK government has awarded a contract worth up to £875m for a range of printer hardware and multi-function devices in a move which again raises questions about whether the paperless office was a dream that has faded in the recesses of our collective memory.

In a contract award notice, the Crown Commercial Service (CCS), which spearheads cross-government procurement under the umbrella of the Cabinet Office, said a gang of hardware vendors had won work that might be sufficient to buy Newcastle United Football Club twice over and have change to spare.

CCS worked with education buying agencies YPO and ESPO to put the deal together, which began with a prior information notice covered in these pages. The "pan-government collaborative agreement", which can be accessed by central government departments and other public-sector bodies, is split into four lots:

  • Multifunctional Devices (MFDs) and Basic Print Management Software and Associated Services
  • MFDs, Print Management and/or Digital Workflow Software and Associated Services
  • MFDs, Print Management and/or Digital Workflow under Managed Service Provision
  • Print Consultancy Services

So lots of printing. You get the picture. The contracts are due to run from September 2021 until 2025.

The winner of the first lot, valued at £150m, is Ricoh. The second lot (£350m) has nine winners: Konica Minolta Business Solutions; Specialist Computer Centres; XMA; Canon; Vision (office automation); Xerox; Ricoh; Kyocera Document Solutions; and HP Inc.

The third lot, worth £325m, was won by Air Copier Systems; EBM Office Centre; Vision (Office Automation); HP Inc; Computacenter; Konica Minolta Business Solutions; and Ricoh. The final lot worth £50m was won by UK Prints Audits and PuroSolutions.

All of which raises questions about whether the government harbours any ambition to use less paper. The CCS has been asked for a comment.

According to the CCS - which makes a 1 per cent fee on all sales transacted on the framework - the mix of services available through the agreement is designed to help customers make the most efficient use of consumables like paper and ink.

It would be a bold move. In the age of digital signature and encryption, which has witnessed talk of a paperless office going back at least 20 years, our appetite for the wood-based medium is still not nearly sated.

Research from August found 450 billion fewer pages were printed from home and office devices in 2020 as COVID-19 disrupted the world of work. Volumes plunged 14 per cent on 2019 levels to a total of 2.8 trillion pages, according to IDC. Despite these declines, the world will still print 2.3 trillion pages in 2025 or around 4.4 million pages per minute, enough to cover 39 football fields.

Still, with former Health Secretary Matt Hancock kicking off the £8bn digitisation strategy in 2020 that includes reaching a "core level" of digitisation by 2024, we're sure it's all in hand. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021