Twitter's machine learning algorithms amplify tweets from right-wing politicians over those on the left

Engineers and researchers don't know why


Twitter's algorithms are more likely to boost right-wing content than left-wing posts from politicians and news publications, according to a recent study.

A team of engineers working on Twitter's own ML Ethics, Transparency and Accountability (META) unit scraped millions of tweets of thousands of elected officials from seven different countries: US, Japan, UK, Canada, Germany, Spain, and France. They tracked how likely these posts made between 1 April 2020 and 15 August 2020 were to be placed in a higher rank in users' personal Twitter feeds using Twitter's algorithms.

Tweets posted by politicians from right-wing parties were amplified more than those from left-wing parties in all countries except Germany. The effect was strongest for Canadian and British politics. For example, content from UK Labour MPs was amplified 112 per cent as opposed to the 176 per cent amplification of Conservative MPs' content; and Canada's Liberal party politicos were amplified 43 per cent versus 167 per cent for the Canadian Conservative party.

The percentages were calculated by comparing how often a tweet ended up on a user's Twitter timeline when they had enabled "personalized relevance model", a system that shows the most relevant posts first, compared to "reverse chronological feed", where the latest tweets are displayed. Tweets that rank highly on people's timelines are more likely to be viewed and shared.

"Values over 0 per cent indicate that all parties enjoy an amplification effect by algorithmic personalization, in some cases exceeding 200 per cent, indicating that the party's tweets are exposed to an audience three times the size of the audience they reach,” according to a research paper published [PDF] by the team.

It's unclear why conservatives are favoured over liberals. There are a lot of different factors to consider and many algorithms operating in tandem. Tweets from right-wing politicians are more likely to be boosted over left-wing ones regardless of which party is in power. But party affiliation or political ideology isn't necessarily a strong indicator of whether a tweet would be more likely to be retweeted or not. Elected officials from the same party, for example, are not amplified equally.

"In this study, we identify what is happening: certain political content is amplified on the platform. Establishing why these observed patterns occur is a significantly more difficult question to answer as it is a product of the interactions between people and the platform," said Rumman Chowdhury, director of software engineering, and Luca Belli, a staff Machine Learning researcher.

The same effect happened with news content too. Articles from right-leaning publications were more likely to be algorithmically amplified than left-leaning outlets. For example, Fox News was favored more than BuzzFeed. It's difficult to see why this might be the case, however, without seeing the data.

The META team is currently figuring out how to share its raw dataset to researchers and developers hoping to replicate the study without infringing on the privacy of users' accounts.

"For the past several months, META has been looking into methods to responsibly make available large datasets to support validation. We're finalizing a partnership to leverage privacy preserving technology to enable third-party researchers to reproduce this type of work, while also protecting and safeguarding the privacy of people who use Twitter," it said.

A scaled back version that doesn't contain all the details, however, can be made available to researchers upon request. The Register has asked Twitter for comment. ®

Broader topics


Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022