GCHQ director outlines plan to 'go after' links between ransomware crims and state actors

Sir Jeremy Fleming paints picture of a cultural battle over the internet, AI and the soul of future technology

The UK's Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) boss Sir Jeremy Fleming has outlined a plan to pursue criminal actors who deploy ransomware as well as the state actors that are aware of their efforts.

Speaking remotely to The Cipher Brief Annual Threat Conference on Monday, Fleming discussed the increasing threat of cybercrime – in particular ransomware – and GCHQ's strategy to reduce threats.

"We have to be clear on the red lines and behaviours that we want to see. We've got to go after those links between criminal actors and state actors and impose costs," Fleming argued, in order to make ransomware and other cybercrime less profitable.

Fleming revealed that GCHQ is not afraid to go on the offensive in pursuit of that goal, but added "we're quite a long way off really addressing the profit model which is making this just so easy for criminals to exploit at the moment."

In wide-ranging remarks, Fleming described the current geopolitical situation as offering what he called a "moment of reckoning" that represents a chance for "like-minded Western liberal nations to make sure that the technologies on which we all rely encompass our values, are secured by design, have been subject to the standards and regulations that we approve of, because we think that they do promote our prosperity and our values."

Expressing those values is important, because tech like AI will create big change.

"If you think that the changes we've seen from coronavirus are significant wait till you see the way in which machine learning and AI are going to affect our labour markets," Fleming explained, adding that any approach to AI needs to include an understanding that China and other countries are doing well in the development of AI capabilities.

"We're faced with a set of adversaries now that invested very heavily in their own research, have made major investments in skills, have procured capabilities in a perfectly legitimate way globally and have won the trade battle because the products have been pretty good."

If you do fairly basic cyber security … you’re going to protect yourselves or at least make you harder than competitors and therefore you won’t be as much of a target

Fleming said the pace of change had changed too.

"Sorting that out isn't anymore the preserve of spy agencies or niche security organisations – it's a genuine public, private and international partnership and getting that right is probably the single most important thing we could do."

Fleming also said some responsibility for coping in this time of change falls on individuals and organisations.

After discussing GCHQ's ransomware response, he said "it's not rocket science to defend against this sort of stuff."

"We know that if you do fairly basic cyber security, if you are really clear at an organisational level about things that you need to protect, and if you are very diligent in implementing the guidance of your cyber security professionals and your technology partners, then you're going to protect yourselves or at least make you harder than competitors and therefore you won’t be as much of a target.

"It's a really boring lesson we hack on about a lot in the UK." ®

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021