UK schools slap a hold on facial scanning of children amid fierce criticism

'Consent cannot be truly freely given' says privacy campaigner


The use of facial recognition technology deployed in a number of school canteens across the UK has been put on hold for the time being after the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) intervened to ask some questions.

Some nine schools in North Ayrshire, which is a Scottish authority that includes the Isle of Arran, were scheduled to start processing payments for school meals via facial scanning technology.

This was intended to speed up the delivery of lunches from an average of 25 seconds to five, and potentially reduce COVID-19 infections compared to card payments and fingerprint scanners.

However, campaigners told The Reg last week that using facial recognition in canteens was the wrong solution given the highly sensitive and personal nature of the data, which was to be stored on school servers.

North Ayrshire Council confirmed on 22 October it is pausing the use of the tech, saying: "Having received a number of enquiries in recent days, we have temporarily paused the contactless payment system, which uses facial recognition, in our secondary schools from this afternoon while we consider and respond to the enquiries received."

The Council has said that 97 per cent of parents, carers and children had consented to the use of facial scanning.

"Whilst we are confident the new facial recognition system is operating as planned, we felt it prudent to revert to the previous PIN (Personal Identification Number) system while we consider the enquiries received."

The company behind the system, CRB Cunninghams, announced the introduction of the tech in June as the "next step in cashless catering". David Swanston, the MD of the supplier, said the cameras would verify the pupils' IDs against "encrypted faceprint templates. Some 65 schools had signed up to the deployment," he told the FT.

UK data watchdog, the ICO, told us last week it was "making enquiries with North Ayrshire Council with regards to the processing of pupil's faces."

It said: "Organisations using facial recognition technology must comply with data protection law before, during and after its use.

"In addition, data protection law provides additional protections for children, and organisations need to carefully consider the necessity and proportionality of collecting biometric data before they do so.

"Organisations should consider using a different approach if the same goal can be achieved in a less intrusive manner," it said.

The principal at Great Academy Ashton, in Ashton-under-Lyne, David Waugh, confirmed to the BBC that it had dropped deployment of facial recognition tech.

"The combined fingerprint and facial recognition system was part of an upgrade to the catering cashless system, so that the time it takes to serve students is reduced, thus giving a better dining experience," he said. "However, we will not be using the facial recognition aspect."

Privacy campaigners previously voiced disapproval with Silkie Carlo, director of Big Brother Watch, saying "no child should have to go through border style identity checks just to get a school meal."

Jen Persson, director at digitaldefendme, pointed out that Sweden had issued its first GDPR fine to a school using facial recognition, and data protection folk in France had ordered schools in Marseille to stop the local programme. She told us today:

"We welcome the North Ayrshire decision and it must be made permanent. All UK schools should now follow their lead, and switch from using biometrics of any kind from children, to cashless payment cards, or the least intrusive option available.

"Consent isn't valid as a data processing basis in these disempowered situations, where it's hard to fully understand and consent cannot be truly freely given."

She added that "normalising" a situation where children think that their bodies should be "casually used in these trivial transactions", particularly where consent is a tick in a box, "should be something every adult should recognise as dangerous and unnecessary."

A spokesperson at the ICO told us: "We understand that North Ayrshire Council decided to pause using FRT in schools following our initial enquiries. Our aim is to ensure that children’s data is protected in line with the law and we will continue engaging with the Council on this issue."

The UK government's Surveillance Camera commissioner, Professor Fraser Sampson, told The Register last month that facial recognition tech was "a fast-evolving area and the evidence is elusive but it may be that the aspects currently left to self-determination present the greatest risk to communities or simply to give rise to the greatest concern among citizens."

We have asked CRB Cunninghams to comment. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021