Behold, Eclipse's open-source software defined vehicle project

Microsoft is involved. What could possibly go wrong?

It's been a busy week for the Eclipse Foundation, as the group unveiled a new operating system for distributed devices and cracked open the invitation list for an open-source software-defined vehicle project.

The goal of the latter, according to the Foundation, is to create a vendor-agnostic and open-source approach to automotive software development. "Software-defined vehicles," enthused the group, "will enable vehicle manufacturers as well as automotive suppliers to put software at the very center of vehicle development, with hardware considerations to follow."


Your engine has run into a problem and had to shut down

Members include Bosch and Microsoft and, while the latter's involvement might cause some to wonder what form a car designed by Redmond would take (and the obvious jokes that follow,) the former has long been a big noise in the automotive world and has published its own take on the software-defined vehicle (SWdV.)

Red Hat and SUSE, which last year spoke of its desire to shove Kubernetes behind the wheel, are also involved.

It's fair to say that there is no small amount of salivating going on within the industry at the extra revenue streams potentially on offer as cars continue to get smarter. Subscriptions, over the air updates and software upgrades are all becoming a reality despite the odd hiccup or two (for example, Tesla's Full Self Driving software, the beta of which was abruptly rolled back last week.)

"Today," said Bosch, "a vehicle is in its best condition when it leaves the factory. But in the future, software can be continuously optimized within the limits of the hardware."

The Eclipse initiative aims to keep things vendor agnostic, yet still permit manufacturers to work on differentiating customer features while building from the open foundation. "Although we have extensive roots with the automotive community, a project of this scope and scale has never been attempted before," said Mike Milinkovich, executive director of the Eclipse Foundation.

The initiative comes in the same week as the introduction of the Oniro project, an operating system aimed providing an alternative to established IoT and Edge operating systems.

Milinkovich described Oniro as "open source done right" because, we assume, describing Oniro as "an open-source implementation of OpenHarmony which was based on HarmanyOS, as donated by Huawei to OpenAtom" is probably a bit of a mouthful.

The Brussels-based Eclipse Foundation and China's first open source foundation, OpenAtom, announced a "strategic initiative focused on OpenHarmony" last month, and now here we are.

The plan is that by creating a compatible implementation of OpenHarmony, apps built for Oniro will run on OpenHarmony and vice versa. Industrial and IoT applications are expected to be first in line.

While the Eclipse Foundation might pride itself on its openness and transparency, quite what Western governments that pointedly hold their noses whenever the word "Huawei" is mentioned will make of it will be interesting to observe. ®

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021