Don't super-size me – China defines rules for 'super-large' platforms

Creates category to control what we call a superapp for antitrust behavior and more

China's antitrust watchdog, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) has issued new draft rules for internet platforms the organization considers "super-large" – including vague directives forbidding anticompetitive behavior and more.

It is seeking comment before the rules are finalised.

To fall into this "super-large" category, a platform must have more than 500 million annual active users, a valuation of over ¥1,000bn (about $150bn), employ a business model that restricts vendor access to consumers, and offer at least two core services.

A sampling of Chinese apps that would qualify for the proposed "super large" designation includes familiar names like WeChat, Taobao, Alipay, Meituan and Douyin.

The new rules will hold this large category of internet platforms to higher standards than smaller, less influential apps. Areas governed by the new rules include data security (the way personal information is managed as well as its cross-border flow), fair competition, open ecosystems that promote interoperability, internal governance, risk of fostering illegal content or behaviors, audits and reporting obligations and tax matters There's also a requirement to promote innovation.

The guidelines don't stop at defining super-large platforms. They also identify two other classifications: "large" and "small and medium". It is, at the very least, less confusing than the sizes at Starbucks.

According to the policy announcement, classifying internet platforms by size will keep the platform economy healthy, protect user rights and interests, maintain social and economic order, and protect national security.

"The size of various platforms, social influence and control of various subjects vary widely," wrote SAMR. "Under such circumstances, it would not be appropriate to adopt uniform standards and standardize the activities of the platform with a unified framework."

The elements of a super-large platform sound an awful lot like the description of a superapp – a technology of which China is the birth place.

SAMR seems particularly interested in keeping monopolies from forming in this new realm.

"For super-large platforms, emphasis is placed on the principal responsibility of leading fair competition," argued the watchdog. "This is of great significance to build a reasonable competitive order and open platform ecology in the field of platform economy."

It's also notable that SAMR is requiring "interoperability" of the internet platforms, since the growth of an app can depend on who is excluded. Opening too little means no one can use the product, while opening too much can cause lost revenues because of things like having to share costs and coordination.

But the Middle Kingdom's regulators have recently gone further than defining who is allowed to be a vendor. In September, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) ordered members of China's Big Tech community (like Alibaba and Tencent) to stop blocking links to each other – thus making them interoperable across platforms.

Holding platforms more responsible for the content they provide is also not new. Mounting censorship pressure caused LinkedIn to throw in the towel in the Middle Kingdom only a few weeks ago.

Chinese censorship undoubtedly remains an ongoing concern and when it comes to internet platforms and technology, it seems there's new regulation coming out of the nation's rulers at overwhelming speed.

However, KPMG's Singapore-based Head of Financial Services, Anton Ruddenklau, told The Register that he believes not all of the recent flood of laws is bad.

"I think a lot of the China regulation is quite proportionate and reasonable," said Ruddenklau, who explained that China needed to find the balance between legacy organizations and new industries.

"That's what China's started to think to do: how do we control the bubble, how do we give legacy and new industries fair playing field and how do we protect the rest of the financial and economic system of China?” He continued: "We are doing it in the West. No one talks about it the same way. It's the same thing."

SAMR is welcoming feedback "from the society" on its draft guidelines. All relevant units and individuals are welcome to submit their opinions and suggestions before November 8, 2021 online, via email, or by snail-mail to the address listed here. Although who qualifies as "society", much like the specifics of these regulations, is not entirely clear. ®

Similar topics

Narrower topics

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021