What will the factory of the future look like? Let's start with Intel, Red Hat, and 5G

Machine-to-machine communications, AI, DevOps tech all coming together


Analysis Adding robots or automating machines in old factories isn't as easy as it sounds. Retrofitting factories with new technologies for machines and robots to operate in sync requires a new system architecture.

Many tech companies are trying to fill that gap with hardware and software. Cloud companies, chip makers, software companies and telecom providers are spitballing topologies for machines to communicate directly and analyze data.

On Tuesday Intel said it was going the Linux way for system upgrades in factories. Chipzilla has worked with Red Hat on a blueprint that provides a more granular coordination of machines' operation between facilities, which is now being made possible on the faster 5G networks.

The base of the system architecture is built around machine-to-machine communications between robots, actuators, machines and I/O devices on the shop floor. Manufacturers rely heavily on artificial intelligence to automate machines and boost output, in which case data needs to be sent through a series of steps to higher performing servers that then parse the data.

Raw data gathered through a series of edge computing devices with Intel chips optimizes data flow by cutting off irrelevant data, and making sure only relevant information flows upstream to the on-site data for AI models or analytics. The data transport is orchestrated with Red Hat's OpenShift Kubernetes and virtualization platforms operating at various levels.

The data then flows up to data centers on-site or remotely where machine learning can analyze the data. The results can be spit back out directly to machines and robots, which can then adjust operations.

The architecture is designed to operate in individual factories, or across a network of manufacturing sites.

Edgy moves

Google recently announced its Google Distributed Cloud initiative, where it will offload some processing of information on the edge via hardware certified by the company. The edge device could sit on edge devices hosted by Google, telecom providers or customers. This could be relevant to manufacturers who would want to use Google's cloud service for AI or other applications.

But Intel's and Red Hat's one-size-fits-all factory system architecture may not work for all manufacturers. Some companies cases are building custom technology blueprints to meet their specific needs.

Siemens and Bosch are currently retrofitting their own factories with private 5G networks on spectrum directly licensed from the German government.

The companies are testing autonomous vehicles communicating directly inside factories with each other on the 5G network, which is built within the confines of the factory and not connected with the public network.

In both cases, they are cutting off AI chips and components that helped the vehicles communicate with each other to avoid collisions. Instead, the automated vehicles have a 5G network chip sending back data to an internal cloud, which is mapping out navigation data and directing robot movement. Siemens is equipping factories with 5G small cells and routers and is using the vehicles to transport materials between machines. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021