Google's Pixel 6 fingerprint reader is rubbish because of 'enhanced security algorithms'

Move over 'dog ate my homework', there's a new excuse in town

Google has come up with a cast-iron excuse for why the fingerprint sensor on its latest Pixel 6 series of smartphones appears to be so unreliable – and you're going to love it.

The Pixel 6 and 6 Pro came out in the UK on 28 October, but something that has struck reviewers about the otherwise highly recommended mobe is a recalcitrant fingerprint unlock.

Engadget described the under-screen tech as "slow and finicky", CNET as "frustrating and not a very good experience", and Tom's Guide as "slower than other phones."

While all agreed the Pixel 6/Pro is Google's best phone and decent value for money, it wasn't just the critics who were bothered by the multiple attempts it can take to get into the damn thing.

As spotted by Android Authority, a user wrote to the Made By Google Twitter account: "I do love my new Pixel 6, but the fingerprint sensor is ruining my experience. More often than not I touch the sensor 6 or 7 times before it makes me enter my pin. I'm holding out for a software fix but it's something that would make me get rid of it if it persists."

They received this response:

Not a "Sorry, we're working on a fix" in sight, just three little words that sound cool but on their own mean next to nothing.

"Enhanced security algorithms."

Another unchuffed customer had similar complaints. "Please fix this," they pleaded. "The fingerprint scanner is absolutely frustrating. I cannot recommend this phone to anyone because the execution of the fingerprint scanner is completely amateur."

Google's answer? You guessed it.

Intrigued, The Register enquired about said "algorithms" to try to pry some insight out of the omnipotent, omnipresent, omnibenevolent ad leviathan, and asked why such a feature would prevent the owner from unlocking their phone instantaneously. Like most other smartphones on the market. We also asked whether the mooted "software fix" was possible without compromising the "enhanced security" of the "algorithms."

Rather than answering, Google's press office directed us to the tweet embedded above. Nice.

As Android Authority noted: "It's a rather interesting reason for an iffy in-display fingerprint sensor experience, but we can't say for sure whether Google's solution does indeed have improved security over rival smartphones."

Perhaps Reg readers could take a leaf out of the Chocolate Factory's book. If Google can wave away complaints with vague jargon, surely you can too.

Software project running behind schedule? "We're implementing the enhanced security algorithms."

Deleted a database? "Gah, must have been the enhanced security algorithms."

Couldn't be bothered to finish an assignment? "The enhanced security algorithms ate my homework."

Let us know how you get on. ®

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021