Turns out there is something everyone may agree on in Congress: Let netizens use mostly algorithm-lite apps

Dems, Repubs in House, Senate unite for Filter Bubble Transparency Act


A proposed bipartisan law that would force tech companies to let netizens view posts and search results free of meddling by mysterious algorithms has gained further support in Congress.

On Tuesday, US House reps Ken Buck (R-CO), David Cicilline (D-RI), Lori Trahan (D-MA), and Burgess Owens (R-UT) introduced the Filter Bubble Transparency Act [PDF] as first reported by Axios.

This complements a law bill proposed by a bipartisan group of senators in June.

Lawmakers want to give users a chance “to see unmanipulated content on internet platforms." Specifically, the bill targets what it calls “opaque” algorithms: secret programs that rely on “user-specific data that was not expressly provided by the user to the platform for such purpose.”

They want qualifying companies to each install a “prominently placed icon” on their apps and websites so netizens can choose between viewing information ordered by opaque algorithms or by “input-transparent algorithms.”

For example, social networks that automatically determine interesting posts, and make those posts prominent for users to see, are probably using algorithms that would be considered opaque – it's not clear why those posts were chosen, and they may rely on personal information the user didn't think was being taken into account.

Meanwhile, something like a search engine or recommendation system that requires a user to supply a specific input, such as a request for nearby coffee shops or songs by their favorite artist, would be exempt. Content moderation algorithms that display articles, videos, or posts for specific age groups can stay as well.

In practice this could mean platforms like Facebook or TikTok potentially have to provide feeds of content untouched by their complex curation algorithms. Twitter, for example, gives people the choice of seeing “top tweets” ranked by its model, or by reverse chronological order where the very latest tweets appear at the top.

The overall goal is to ensure people aren't forced into using unexplained, exploitative algorithms that secretly draw upon personal info, and are instead offered the ability to select how information is ordered.

The Filter Bubble Transparency Act mainly targets Big Tech. Organizations that have fewer than a million users, employ fewer than 500 employees, or have made less than $50m over the past three years are excused.

The House reps hope the law be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission. ®

Broader topics

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021