'Automate or die!' Gartner reckons most biz apps will be developed via low-code by the people who use them

Also: AI is near the 'trough of disillusionment'

Gartner analyst Milind Govekar believes that application development is moving to "low code or no code," and software development shifting to "assembly and integration."

Speaking at the Gartner IT Symposium, Govekar said that cloud disruption is still under way and, according to his analysts, organisations are 17 times more likely to increase cloud spend than to reduce it in the next year. By 2025, he argued, cloud spending will exceed non-cloud spending in IT (today it is around one third, he said) and half of enterprise workloads will be deployed on a hyperscale provider, whether that is in public cloud, on-premises or at the edge.

Most organizations "are just scratching the surface with cloud, in terms of its innovation potential," Govekar told the symposium, adding that "there will be no business strategy without a cloud strategy."

The line between cloud and on-premises is less clear than it used to be, with options like AWS Outposts offering AWS-managed infrastructure located on-premises, or Azure Arc, which brings on-premises infrastructure under cloud management, or Google Anthos, which can run GKE (Google Kubernetes Engine) on-premises. "A distributed cloud strategy enables organisations to address the shortcomings of private cloud," said Govekar.

You will become increasingly locked into provider-specific features

Lock-in? Yes, Govekar said. "You will become increasingly locked into provider-specific features," but he added that 60 per cent of their enterprise customers believe that the benefits of lock-in (or perhaps the benefits achieved alongside lock-in) outweigh the risks. Migrating an application from cloud to cloud will not be easy and will take "more than a year on average," he said.

Govekar is opinionated when it comes to business application development. "Challenge any new monolithic solution," he said, perhaps putting himself at odds with microservices expert Sam Newman, who said last year that "microservices should not be the default choice."

There is more to this than just avoiding monoliths, however. Govekar argues that "application development will shift to application assembly and integration ... in 2025 you will develop composable applications by assembling and integrating package-based capabities." This will "fuel the continued growth of API marketplaces," he said. API access to SaaS (software as a service) is increasing such that "by 2025, the boundaries between SaaS and PaaS [platform as a service] will disappear."

Composing such applications will be easier than traditional development, thanks to increasing use of low-code or no-code techniques, enabling "business technologists" to be developers. Govekar believes this approach will form 70 per cent of new applications. "Applications of the future will be assembled and composed by the people that actually use them," he said. He even used the dreaded catchphrase "citizen development," which he assured virtual listeners "will transform the scale and the economics of application development and software engineering."

Assembly and integration: future of application development?

Assembly and integration: future of application development?

What are the top misconceptions about cloud? Cost is one; only 13 per cent of organisations report saving money. Repatriation, or bringing applications back on-premises, is "very rare," he said. Third, a multicloud strategy does not prevent lock-in; it is rather "multiple points of lock-in," he said.

He is also a private cloud sceptic. "True private clouds are extremely rare," he said. Mere virtualization and automation does not "deliver the benefits of cloud," Govekar argued. "By 2025, 80 per cent of internal private cloud initiatives that attempt to build full function capabilities will be abandoned."

The notion of distributed cloud, which brings hyperscaler services to the location where they are needed, will be more compelling, he said, extending to 50 per cent of enterprises, which is "a dramatic increase from today."

Security? "Through 2025, more than 99 per cent of cloud infrastructure breaches will not be the cloud provider's fault," Govekar said, "but will be caused by customer misconfiguration, mismanagement or mistakes. A properly configured cloud is often more secure than most existing applications and infrastructure."

Avoiding mistakes will be achieved via a programmatic approach to deployment, using infrastructure-as-code concepts. "Once in production, applications should be immutable," he said, "with changes being driven by development … automate or die." There are implications for the way IT departments are organised, and blurred lines between business and IT.

As more IT is delegated to cloud providers, what skills should be retained in-house? There are four key competencies, Govekar argued: strategy, architecture, security, and sourcing.

It all sounds like a pitch for the big public clouds – but Govekar was less enthused about the AI hype, saying that while interest remains very high, CEOs polled have reduced their expectations of the significance of AI in the next three years, with 18 per cent now rating it a top technology versus 29 per cent a year ago. Speaking to The Register, Govekar mentioned a specific case where "the challenge that they had was garbage in, garbage out. You have rubbish data, you get a rubbish algorithm and a rubbish outcome."

Is AI near the well-known "trough of disillusionment?" in the Gartner hype cycle? "It has not yet hit the trough of disillusionment, but it's not far," said Govekar.

Is multicloud an advantage or a mistake? It is inevitable, Govekar told us. "Most organisations are multicloud already, so the big question becomes how do I manage that situation?" He does not see it as a problem.

"It will be a benefit. Going to just one cloud is impractical. It's not going to happen." That said, he advocates avoiding proliferation. "Having fewer is definitely an advantage" – though the ideal number will vary for each organisation.

The lock-in issue is not a big one for most organisations, he said. "They are going in with their eyes open, saying they are using, for example, AWS because it gives me capabilities that don't exist in my organisation. It will take me years to build that." ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021