Apps made with Google's Flutter may fritter away CPU cycles. Here's what the web giant intends to do about it

Chocolate Factory's cross-platform framework seems to struggle to craft efficient desktop software

Google's Flutter cross-platform app framework appears to have a thinking problem: in certain situations, Flutter desktop apps consume too much processing power.

How much is too much? Try an extra six to ten per cent CPU usage just to recreate the blink of a cursor in the style of a native macOS app. That's an improvement over the 100 per cent CPU usage reported in 2019, though that was when Flutter desktop app support was in alpha stage.

This would be a showstopper on mobile devices, where users won't tolerate apps that make their phones go dark from battery exhaustion. But energy inefficiency hasn't proven to be a common problem in Flutter Android and iOS builds recently, though it was something of a concern as Flutter has matured. The more pressing issue on mobile devices for Flutter devs is still trying to reduce "jank" – lag created by shader compilation.

For desktop apps, particularly on plugged-in devices, excessive resource consumption is often tolerated as a trade-off for developer/user convenience, as can be inferred from the ongoing lavish lifestyle of many Electron-based apps, which use memory and CPU rather liberally.

But one of Flutter's selling points is the possibility that it can provide smaller, more performant apps than the Electron framework or similar cross-platform technologies.

FlutterFlow builds mobile apps for Android and iOS

An easier way to Flutter? Custom functions improve visual code builder but devs may still be frustrated


Flutter offers developers a set of tools for creating builds of apps that can run on Android, iOS, Windows, macOS, or Linux, the web, and embedded devices from a single code base. It does so by relying heavily on Skia, a graphics-rendering engine written in C/C++ that uses a device's CPU or GPU to draw app interfaces on its own, without relying on native platform interface libraries.

But by handling compositing independently, Flutter has magnified the challenge of writing resource optimized code. Flutter's avoidance of native libraries deprives it of some of the efficiencies available to native platform code.

For Flutter, the blinking cursor CPU tax has been an open GitHub Issue for more than a year.

As of August 2020, Kaushik Iska, senior software engineer at Google, said Flutter was working as expected and that the Flutter team might consider improvements at a later date:

If you were to create an application with a simple text box on macOS, the native application can essentially sleep as most of the heavy lifting is done by the system compositor. In Flutter the cursor is a timer and for each frame we need to composite and paint the layer tree to the surface. I’ve confirmed that we aren’t doing any additional work than expected.

Flutter also has the dart VM running to run the framework code to produce each frame and we expect that this will incur additional overhead as compared to native applications. Given this I think this is working as intended. If we at a later stage determine that we need to hit specific CPU and GPU utilization goals we can revisit this issue and try to find some improvements.

That later date hasn't yet arrived but there are signs it might soon. A spokesperson for Google told The Register, "Flutter desktop support is still in progress, and it's a bit early to judge performance."

Indeed, Flutter for desktop is still designated as beta software, and there's ample evidence Google's engineers have been improving performance over time.

Canonical: Flutter now 'the default choice for future desktop and mobile apps'


We were also told that the cursor issue doesn't reflect resource usage in other scenarios, and that the Flutter team intends to fix or mitigate this at some point.

The reengineering will need to extend beyond Flutter's cursor tax, however. There are reports of excessive memory usage on Linux builds, too, which will need to be fixed to make Flutter suitable for IoT scenarios. And there's Flutter's practice of redrawing every animated widget in full, as opposed to just portions of the screen that have changed – something that may soon be improved.

Creating one framework to rule them all isn't easy. Then again, neither is writing native operating system code. ®

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021