Randox's Certifly app for vaccinated international arrivals has to be side-loaded onto Android phones

Which, alongside its £20-a-pop COVID-19 tests, isn't a great look


If you're paying for a vital service such as a COVID-19 test when travelling abroad, it's reasonable to expect it to be backed by an approved app from one of the major app stores. However not if that test is from health lab Randox.

No, to install its mandatory Certifly app on an Android device, you need to enable side-loading of apps from unknown sources, then follow a link or a QR code.

Randox does have a presence on the Google App Store, but that app doesn't include the Certifly functionality. That's a significant drawback when such a test is a legal requirement.

At £20 per test, and given that the app is already at version 1.7 less than a month after it was launched, frustrated testees are asking what's taking so long.

Randox told us the delay lies with Google: "Google Play has indicated that adjusted work schedules are causing longer than usual review times for app submissions. Randox can confirm the CertiFly app has been submitted to Google and is awaiting review."

Maybe users should stick to plain old dead-tree printouts in the meantime. Your reporter and his family travelled in and out of the British Isles via London Gatwick last month. Despite a dozen pages of documentation per person, we were disappointed to note no COVID-related checks (or even checkpoints) there whatsoever, unlike at the start and end of the trip… but we don't recommend betting your trip on that.

Privacy and security concerns are an issue about tools whose purpose is to track or identify people – especially when it's a matter of life or death. Unfortunately, the British government has a poor record at this, although it promised to tighten up its act. At least the app didn't cost £14m, wasn't legally questionable, and didn't record who had it or not.

If the Randox name sounds familiar, it might be because it paid former Secretary of State Owen Paterson rather more per year as a part-time consultant than his ministerial salary.

He was formerly the Environment Secretary who backed the badger cull until he was sacked by then Prime Minister David Cameron.

His salary won't have dented Randox's finances too hard in so far the government has awarded it, according to Labour leader Keir Starmer, "government contracts worth over £600m, without competition or tender".

Readers may have also noticed questions have been raised following an investigation into Randox's methods and procedures, and not for the first time. In January 2017 Randox reported it had discovered an alleged manipulation of quality data within its laboratory processes in Manchester, causing forensic results on over 8,000 police cases to be retested. In August 2020, it had to recall 750,000 test kits sent to care homes and elsewhere, because swabs were "not up to standard." ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021