Remember SoftRAM 95? Compression app claimed to double memory in Windows but actually did nothing at all

Microsoft's Raymond Chen was tasked with digging into the issue


One of the most consistently interesting and entertaining Microsoft blogs, Raymond Chen's Old New Thing, recently covered the dissection of a best-selling bit of software for Windows 95 – SoftRAM 95. There are few lessons about modern software in there as well.

What SoftRAM 95 claimed to do was software memory compression – on-the-fly compressing data in RAM so that your OS has more fast storage available than without the software. This crazy-sounding idea first appeared with Connectix's RAMdoubler in 1994, back when Mac OS 7.1 was current (although it worked on System 6, too). It was a slightly easier proposition on classic MacOS, due to its very basic, semi-manual memory management. Doubling your system's RAM sounded like a great deal in 1994, when a 4MB SIMM would cost $170 – £230 today.

Memory compression works by introducing a second level of swapping to the OS. OSes that support virtual memory have a two-way split, between real physical RAM and virtual memory in a file on disk. Memory compression introduces a layer in between these: it partitions off a block of system memory for compression. When the OS runs low on RAM and swaps something out to disk, the memory compressor intercepts this, compresses the contents using a fast algorithm, but keeps it in RAM. It's fairly likely that the data will be needed again soon, and if so, the memory compressor decompresses it and puts it back in main memory. This operation is considerably faster than retrieving it from the hard drive – in computer terms, it's days versus weeks.

RAM compression is still very much a thing today. The feature is built into Windows 10 and has been in macOS since 10.9. Linux has not one but two comparable features, but they're optional.

Back in the '90s, this was state-of-the-art stuff. Mark Russinovich, then of Winternals but now a Microsoftie himself, analysed SoftRAM 95, wrote a tool to test the functionality, and declared that it didn't work. (We've linked to all three pages as after quarter of a century, the page-number buttons no longer work.) Interestingly, two of its rivals did work, although people's enthusiasm very quickly wore off.

SoftRAM did have some marginally useful functionality on Windows 3.1, achievable for free anyway by tweaking some config files, but on Windows 95 it didn't do anything at all. This caused a minor scandal at the time – even renowned tech journal the Christian Science Monitor mentioned it.

In case you think that such things couldn't happen today, they do. Antivirus apps for iOS were for a time an example, even though iOS sandboxes apps – so an app literally cannot scan your phone.

One of the common ones today are "registry cleaners". Windows' registry doesn't need cleaning, and by removing entries, these can harm your PC. Want a cleaner PC? Run the built-in Disk Cleanup tool. Tick all the boxes and click OK. Then do it again and press the "Clean up system files" button. Reboot, and the job's a good one. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Robotics and 5G to spur growth of SoC industry – report
    Big OEMs hogging production and COVID causing supply issues

    The system-on-chip (SoC) side of the semiconductor industry is poised for growth between now and 2026, when it's predicted to be worth $6.85 billion, according to an analyst's report. 

    Chances are good that there's an SoC-powered device within arm's reach of you: the tiny integrated circuits contain everything needed for a basic computer, leading to their proliferation in mobile, IoT and smart devices. 

    The report predicting the growth comes from advisory biz Technavio, which looked at a long list of companies in the SoC market. Vendors it analyzed include Apple, Broadcom, Intel, Nvidia, TSMC, Toshiba, and more. The company predicts that much of the growth between now and 2026 will stem primarily from robotics and 5G. 

    Continue reading
  • Deepfake attacks can easily trick live facial recognition systems online
    Plus: Next PyTorch release will support Apple GPUs so devs can train neural networks on their own laptops

    In brief Miscreants can easily steal someone else's identity by tricking live facial recognition software using deepfakes, according to a new report.

    Sensity AI, a startup focused on tackling identity fraud, carried out a series of pretend attacks. Engineers scanned the image of someone from an ID card, and mapped their likeness onto another person's face. Sensity then tested whether they could breach live facial recognition systems by tricking them into believing the pretend attacker is a real user.

    So-called "liveness tests" try to authenticate identities in real-time, relying on images or video streams from cameras like face recognition used to unlock mobile phones, for example. Nine out of ten vendors failed Sensity's live deepfake attacks.

    Continue reading
  • Lonestar plans to put datacenters in the Moon's lava tubes
    How? Founder tells The Register 'Robots… lots of robots'

    Imagine a future where racks of computer servers hum quietly in darkness below the surface of the Moon.

    Here is where some of the most important data is stored, to be left untouched for as long as can be. The idea sounds like something from science-fiction, but one startup that recently emerged from stealth is trying to turn it into a reality. Lonestar Data Holdings has a unique mission unlike any other cloud provider: to build datacenters on the Moon backing up the world's data.

    "It's inconceivable to me that we are keeping our most precious assets, our knowledge and our data, on Earth, where we're setting off bombs and burning things," Christopher Stott, founder and CEO of Lonestar, told The Register. "We need to put our assets in place off our planet, where we can keep it safe."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022