AWS chops data transfer fees by massive extension of free tier – 2 months after rival previewed R2 Storage

Customer: 'I should send Cloudflare a Christmas card to say thanks'


AWS has improved its free tier for data transfer, from 1GB to 100GB per month for transfer to the internet, and from 50GB to 1TB for CloudFront, its content delivery network.

According to AWS chief evangelist Jeff Barr "as a result of this change millions of AWS customers worldwide will no longer see a charge for these two categories of data transfer," which is effective from 1 December.

The free allocation will apply to services such as S3 (Simple Storage Service), web applications on EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) VMs and so on. There is an exclusion for the AWS GovCloud and for China regions.

Other details are that the number of free HTTP and HTTPS requests to CloudFront are to be increased from 2 million to 10 million, and the offer of two million free CloudFront function invocations per month is no longer limited to the first year.

While Barr attributes the change to a "tradition of AWS price reductions" many industry watchers link the price reduction to competition from others, including Cloudflare which in September previewed R2 Storage, which implements Amazon's S3 API but without egress fees.

In July, Cloudflare accused AWS of excessive rates for data egress, stating that customers in North America and Europe pay 80 times what the service costs AWS to operate.

Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince said on Twitter, in response to the AWS news, "Well, that was fast!! I'm doing the dance of joy! Great news for our mutual customers. And the next step toward the inevitable end of cloud egress [fees]."

A customer commented on Hacker News, "I use 500GB–1TB per month on Cloudfront, costing about $50–100 per month, and I was going to move this over to Cloudflare to take advantage of their savings. However, this AWS change will basically wipe out my entire Cloudfront bill. I should send Cloudflare a Christmas card to say thanks."

It does seem that AWS intends to stop customers bleeding to Cloudflare with this move. There are caveats, though. One is that this is a free tier, so that customers using data transfer beyond these amounts will still pay the high AWS fees. For these users, the free tier becomes a discount. Enterprises for whom content distribution is core to their business will benefit by looking elsewhere. Netflix, for example, built its own CDN connecting to ISPs around the world.

Second, AWS has plenty of other fees to fall back on. S3, for example, charges fees for storage and for API operations such as PUT and GET requests. There are further charges for analytics, Lambda integration, and so on.

Rival storage service Wasabi, which this week announced a new storage region in London, claimed the S3 charges follow a strategy of "make the transaction charges so ridiculously small that customers don't notice, don't care, or can't figure out how to calculate them. Then do this for all of your hundreds of thousands of customers and trillions of objects, and kick back and watch your coffers overflow as time goes by." (Wasabi charges only for storage and claims to be 80 per cent cheaper than S3.)

Cloudflare is not clear on this matter of operation fees, in the context of R2, and said only that "R2 will zero-rate infrequent storage operations under a threshold — currently planned to be in the single digit requests per second range. Above this range, R2 will charge significantly less per-operation than the major providers."

Is Prince really celebrating or will Cloudflare worry about R2 losing some of its appeal? Questioned on this matter earlier this month, in an earnings call, Prince said that if AWS were to take egress fees to zero, "it would force us to continue to innovate in that space, just like it would force everyone else to innovate in the space."

Prince also said that interest in R2 was "off the charts". He hopes for Cloudflare to integrate with all the hyperscale public cloud providers and to be "the fabric that connects all of that together." ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021