US bans Chinese firms – including one linked to HPE’s China JV – for feeding tech to Beijing's military

Other additions to Entity List are accused of helping Pakistan, North Korea make nukes, missiles


The US Dept of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security has added 27 companies to its list of entities prohibited from doing business with the USA on grounds they threaten national security – and one of the firms is associated with HPE’s Chinese joint venture H3C.

A preliminary announcement [PDF] of the bans lists a company named New H3C Semiconductor Technologies Co., Ltd on the grounds of its “support of the military modernization of the People’s Liberation Army.”

The addresses given by Uncle Sam for this semiconductor business matches those listed on the website of New H3C, the Chinese company formed as a joint venture between HPE and Tsinghua Unigroup to build networking products. H3C is still the exclusive provider of HPE servers, storage, and associated technical services in China.

"I can confirm that the company is associated with New H3C. We are looking into the Commerce Department’s action today," an HPE spokesperson told The Register.

We await the results of that investigation with great interest, as even though the US-based giant does not hold a majority position in H3C, the allegation that a firm with American connections has been named as acting against America's interests is eyebrow-raising.

Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo characterized another eight newly banned Chinese firms as working to advance Beijing’s “efforts that support military applications, such as counter-stealth and counter-submarine applications, and the ability to break encryption or develop unbreakable encryption.”

Another 16 entities from China and Pakistan were added to the verboten entity list “based on their contributions to Pakistan’s unsafeguarded nuclear activities or ballistic missile program.” If you end up on this Dept of Commerce entity list, you will find it rather difficult to do lawful business with American organizations.

Corad Technology Limited, a Chinese firm that earned its place on the entity list in 2019, has been joined by three affiliates that the Commerce Department says have been selling US tech to the military and space programs of Iran, North Korea, and Chinese companies. Those affiliates operate from Singapore, Japan, and Shenzen.

A quick reminder: Pakistan and North Korea possess nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles with which to deliver them, to some degree, while Iran has the capacity or intent to build nukes.

The Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology also scored a ban, on grounds it has made military products for an unidentified military end-user.

The Commerce Department’s announcement of the new additions to its naughty lists characterizes the newly named Chinese firms as “PRC government and defense industry subordinate entities.” Those words reflect the USA’s belief that China uses private firms to obtain technology with military applications during what appears to be legitimate commercial activity.

China, in turn, paints its businesses as just trying to get their hands on the best tech available, in pursuit of products that will satisfy domestic and global buyers. ®

Similar topics

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • India reveals home-grown server that won't worry the leading edge

    And a National Blockchain Strategy that calls for gov to host BaaS

    India's government has revealed a home-grown server design that is unlikely to threaten the pacesetters of high tech, but (it hopes) will attract domestic buyers and manufacturers and help to kickstart the nation's hardware industry.

    The "Rudra" design is a two-socket server that can run Intel's Cascade Lake Xeons. The machines are offered in 1U or 2U form factors, each at half-width. A pair of GPUs can be equipped, as can DDR4 RAM.

    Cascade Lake emerged in 2019 and has since been superseded by the Ice Lake architecture launched in April 2021. Indian authorities know Rudra is off the pace, and said a new design capable of supporting four GPUs is already in the works with a reveal planned for June 2022.

    Continue reading
  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021