UK government backs away from proposals to remove individuals' rights to challenge AI decision making

Meanwhile, ICO says government should not be choosing its CEO in debate over its future independence


The UK government is backing away from proposals to remove individuals' rights to challenge decisions made about them by artificial intelligence following an early analysis of its consultation process.

In its response to the consultation "Data: A new direction", which set out proposals for changing UK data protection law following the nation's departure from the European Union, the government would look to the "efficacy of safeguards" with respect to automated decision-making about people, rather than the removal of safeguards, Harry Lee, deputy director, data protection and data rights, Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport told a conference yesterday.

In September 2021, the government published a consultation that suggested it could water down individuals' rights to challenge decisions made about them by AI.

The DCMS paper said that the need "to provide human review [of AI decisions] may, in future, not be practicable or proportionate."

In the UK's current implementation of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR via the Data Protection Act 2018), people have a right to not be subject to a solely automated decision-making process with significant effects.

The government's consultation followed a recommendation from the much-derided Taskforce on Innovation, Growth and Regulatory Reform (TIGRR) that Article 22 of the UK's GDPR implementation – which outlines subjects' rights to challenge automated decisions – should be removed, and was greeted with outrage from campaign groups.

The consultation is now closed. Speaking at the Westminster eForum policy conference Data protection and the future of data regulation in the UK, Lee said there had been a lot of concern about the removal of Article 22 from the current law.

"Our focus is really to look at how to improve the efficacy of safeguards with respect to automated decision making in light of many respondents flagging shortcomings in its design. That, rather than removal, is a more fruitful area of work for us over the coming months," Lee said.

The government is also proposing changes to the governance of the data protection regulator, the Information Commissioner's Office, in its shake-up of data protection law.

Look out for data watchdog independence

Last year, the outgoing Information Commissioner warned about the office's future independence in light of the proposals, saying the ICO needed to "be able to hold government to account" with a governance model that "preserves its independence."

Also speaking at the Westminster eForum conference yesterday, Louise Byers, director of planning risk and governance at the ICO, offered specific tests for the future independence of the office.

She said the ICO had in its response backed the move to a board model, with a chair and chief executive roles. However, the appointment of the CEO should be for the statutory board, not the government, as it proposes. She also warned against the government signing off codes of practice.

"We've highlighted in our response and concerns around the proposal for the Secretary of State to sign off to codes of practice and complex guidance, and also for the Secretary of State to make the appointment of the CEO role to the board, which is something we believe should be a role for the new secretary board," she said.

"We believe it's vital that whatever reforms are put in place, they maintain both the practicalities and perception of the independence of the ICO to allow us to continue to hold government and public sector to account," Byers added.

She said the independence of the ICO was vital to the adequacy decision which currently allows data sharing with the EU, and similar decisions which might allow data sharing in other jurisdictions.

The DCMS's Lee said the ICO's role as an independent regulator was "important to creating and maintaining trust" with the public.

"I can understand why, in some instances, there are concerns about the impact [of the proposals] on the ICO's independence and we're going to look at those closely," he said.

Lee offered no specific assurances that the government would not get involved in choosing the ICO's CEO or signing off codes of practice and guidance. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Despite global uncertainty, $500m hit doesn't rattle Nvidia execs
    CEO acknowledges impact of war, pandemic but says fundamentals ‘are really good’

    Nvidia is expecting a $500 million hit to its global datacenter and consumer business in the second quarter due to COVID lockdowns in China and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Despite those and other macroeconomic concerns, executives are still optimistic about future prospects.

    "The full impact and duration of the war in Ukraine and COVID lockdowns in China is difficult to predict. However, the impact of our technology and our market opportunities remain unchanged," said Jensen Huang, Nvidia's CEO and co-founder, during the company's first-quarter earnings call.

    Those two statements might sound a little contradictory, including to some investors, particularly following the stock selloff yesterday after concerns over Russia and China prompted Nvidia to issue lower-than-expected guidance for second-quarter revenue.

    Continue reading
  • Another AI supercomputer from HPE: Champollion lands in France
    That's the second in a week following similar system in Munich also aimed at researchers

    HPE is lifting the lid on a new AI supercomputer – the second this week – aimed at building and training larger machine learning models to underpin research.

    Based at HPE's Center of Excellence in Grenoble, France, the new supercomputer is to be named Champollion after the French scholar who made advances in deciphering Egyptian hieroglyphs in the 19th century. It was built in partnership with Nvidia using AMD-based Apollo computer nodes fitted with Nvidia's A100 GPUs.

    Champollion brings together HPC and purpose-built AI technologies to train machine learning models at scale and unlock results faster, HPE said. HPE already provides HPC and AI resources from its Grenoble facilities for customers, and the broader research community to access, and said it plans to provide access to Champollion for scientists and engineers globally to accelerate testing of their AI models and research.

    Continue reading
  • Workday nearly doubles losses as waves of deals pushed back
    Figures disappoint analysts as SaaSy HR and finance application vendor navigates economic uncertainty

    HR and finance application vendor Workday's CEO, Aneel Bhusri, confirmed deal wins expected for the three-month period ending April 30 were being pushed back until later in 2022.

    The SaaS company boss was speaking as Workday recorded an operating loss of $72.8 million in its first quarter [PDF] of fiscal '23, nearly double the $38.3 million loss recorded for the same period a year earlier. Workday also saw revenue increase to $1.43 billion in the period, up 22 percent year-on-year.

    However, the company increased its revenue guidance for the full financial year. It said revenues would be between $5.537 billion and $5.557 billion, an increase of 22 percent on earlier estimates.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022