Apple again extends waiver for in-app purchasing requirement for online experiences

We'll know the pandemic is over when Apple starts insisting on its cut of fees for events again


If you're looking for a sign that the COVID-19 pandemic has eased and life is approaching normal, Apple has a bad omen: the fruity company has again extended viral relief to developers.

Apple has offered a smidgen of help since early 2020 by waiving App Store Review Guideline 3.1.1, which requires apps offering paid online group services to do so via in-app purchases.

By dropping that requirement, Apple reckoned it helped some businesses.

The waiver has was since been extended, and on Saturday Apple extended it again.

“Given the recent resurgence of COVID and its continued impact on in-person services, we’ve extended the most recent deadline to June 30, 2022,” said Apple in a canned statement.

The post reminds developers that one-to-one services like tutoring, medical consultations, real estate tours or fitness training can use whatever method they like to accept payments anyway, so this really just applies to group events.

Yet if June 30 is Apple's estimate of when other event formats won't need help, that's a tad ominous.

Apple has also extended the date in which apps in its Store must enable its users to initiate account deletion, citing implementation complexity. Previously the deadline for this functionality was January 31, 2022, but June 30, 2022 is the new deadline.

Apple’s had restructured a few of its fees since the pandemic began. In November 2020, it halved commission for developers making up to US$1M in sales via the App Store. While some may have cheered, others saw it as a thinly veiled attempt to please regulatory bodies without genuinely changing its fee structure or addressing its monopoly position.

Meanwhile in Korea, Apple has dragged its heels to comply an amendment to South Korea’s Telecommunications Business Act that prevents tech giants with dominant market positions from forcing their own payment method.

The amendment passed in September 2021, Google complied in November, while Apple argued it was already compliant. After some fines and persistence from Korea Communications Commission (KCC), Apple decided in January it was probably a good idea to comply.

As for when Apple policy for digital experiences will shift and developers will be required to use in-app purchasing, it may turn out a little bit like Groundhog day – the actual day, not the film. If the policy requires in-app purchases, it may signal there’s only six more weeks of COVID. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022