English county council blasted for 'inept project management' in delayed SAP replacement

Questions remain over whether Surrey's £3.2m budget increase will avoid further delay

A Surrey councillor has slammed his county council's £1bn-budget effort to replace its ERP system, describing it as "inept project management."

Resources and Performance Select Committee chairman Steven McCormick told a council meeting the public body was mismanaging taxpayers' money by overpaying £3.2m on a new Unit4-based SaaS system to support payroll, HR, finance and procurement functions.

At a budget meeting yesterday, he said: "This is an inexcusable waste of public money, wholly avoidable with proper planning and competent implementation."

Earlier this month The Reg revealed the council had incurred the additional costs on the project as the go-live date was reset for April 2022.

The southeast England council had planned to go live with the new system in December 2021.

Surrey councillor and resources committee member McCormick said: "There has been at least four months delay, with continuing risk and extra cost to the Surrey council taxpayer of £3.2 million. That is inept project management, despite a clear warning."

A meeting in January heard that problems with the project to replace an SAP R/3 system - dating back to 2004 - with a SaaS application were known in June but not discussed with key council committees until after September. In April and June last year, new requirements from the HR department continued to arrive after the main software build was complete.

The application supplier assured the southern-England council these changes could be accommodated within the original project timeline, but by September it became clear it wasn't going to make that December 2021 launch date, the Resources and Performance Select Committee meeting heard late last month.

The project delay created additional support costs from the incumbent supplier. The original business case pointed out that it would need to "provide notice to SAP by September 2021 to end support & maintenance contract by January 2022" or negotiate a contract extension with the supplier of the legacy system.

That contract was re-negotiated and extended in October, at a £700k additional cost to the council.

The Unit4 contract got off to an inauspicious start when it was erroneously advertised as a £40m deal in January, which the council was later forced to correct.

As it planned the procurement the council docs said: "The existing server hardware has reached end of life and is on expensive extended support, with costs increasing every year."

While the existing system is nearly 18 years old, it has been re-platformed several times in an effort to save the council money running it.

Criticism of the Conservative-party-led council from the Residents' Association and Independent Group came at a Budget Meeting on Tuesday. The meeting refused to back calls to use £150m reserves to spend more on public health and avoid a £77 rise in annual council tax bills. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022