AWS and Elasticsearch settle trademark infringement lawsuit

'There is only one Elasticsearch, and it comes from Elastic'

The dispute between AWS and Elastic looks to be over, with Elastic saying the trademark infringement lawsuit is "resolved."

"Now the only Elasticsearch service on AWS and the AWS Marketplace is Elastic Cloud," said Elastic.

For its part, Amazon Web Services has begun stripping the term "Elasticsearch" from its website, services, and project names.

"We view this as a significant step in removing the confusion in the marketplace because there is only one Elasticsearch, and it's only from Elastic," said Shay Banon, founder and chief technology officer of Elastic.

The pair filed a joint stipulation of dismissal of the September 2019 lawsuit last week, records reveal [PDF]. Further terms were not disclosed.

Elasticsearch is a database search engine, and a darling of the enterprise search world (DB-Engines has the platform ranked top as of February 2022). It was initially released in 2010 and Amazon introduced a service called "Elasticsearch" in 2015. Banon's firm was not impressed – and considered that the use of the name created "confusion" in the market – and a bitter dispute ensued, including the 2019 lawsuit and a change of license for the Elastic's Elasticsearch code. Specifically, Elastic moved to non-free licensing in order to limit those vendors who might seek to offer the code as a software-as-a-service offering. The move was not popular with many in the open-source community, with developer Drew DeVaultdeclaring at the time that it was "a move against open source... [and] every single one of 1,573 contributors."

In January 2021, Banon said that both the ElasticSearch and Kibana projects would drop the open-source Apache 2.0 license and adopt what it dubbed the Elastic license and the non-open-source Server Side Public License (SSPL).

Amazon responded by forking the Elasticsearch and Kibana code and renaming it "OpenSearch".

The version 1 milestone was reached in July 2021 and this week's announcement looks like an end to hostilities.

The productization of open-source code by some of the tech giants has long been an issue, occasionally resulting in license changes (MongoDB springs effortlessly to mind). Elastic went down a similar path to MongoDB, although being based on Apache Lucene meant that it could be accused of benefiting from open source while locking down products itself.

Still, there was always that Elasticsearch trademark, which was the subject of the 2019 California suit [PDF].

The Register asked Amazon for its thoughts on the matter, but the box-shifting cloud behemoth has yet to respond.

In the meantime, Elastic seemed happy to be friends again. CEO Ashutosh Kulkarni said: "With this matter behind us, we'll continue to focus on collaboration with Amazon for the benefit of our shared customers who use Elastic Cloud on AWS." ®

Similar topics

Narrower topics

Other stories you might like

  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022