Tencent Cloud ends pursuit of 'revenue growth at all costs'

Plans more SaaS and PaaS, and to stop selling IaaS at a loss

Tencent has decided to stop spending whatever it takes to increase its cloud revenue.

"For IaaS and PaaS, we are repositioning our focus on revenue growth at all costs to customer value creation and quality of growth, which should benefit our customers and margins over the longer term," president Martin Lau told investors on the company's Q4 and FY2021 earnings call yesterday.

Chief strategy officer James Mitchell said Tencent, and other cloud companies, have tried to grow and scale to as many customers as possible.

"In some cases, you would have to undertake very heavy discounts in terms of prices, or … develop very custom-made solutions for customers," he said. Some deals involved hardware resale and offered either very low margins "or sometimes a negative margin."

High marketing costs and the need to recruit – and pay – a channel also contributed to high costs in the cloud business – and to losses.

Tencent wants to get off that treadmill.


IaaS is a lousy business, says Chinese web giant Tencent: PaaS and SaaS is how we'll make money in the cloud


"I think over time, what we felt would be happening is that we would be – once we have reached the right scale and also customer relationship – then we can actually start focusing on healthy growth, which includes a provisioning of products, which are self-developed, and which are more standard products, and which we can reuse over and over again for many different customers," Mitchell said. "And that's how we can actually defray the development costs over a much larger pool of revenue and pull-off customers. And at the same time, we are going to be up selling our customers into PaaS and these PaaS would actually carry much higher margin than IaaS and will be much more disciplined in terms of IaaS pricing and also in terms of not engaging in reselling of hardware at a loss."

Tencent defines PaaS a little differently to the originators of the term – outfits like Cloud Foundry that used the acronym to describe platform-as-a-service and suggest an easily deployable cloud environment. Tencent uses the term to describe its cloudy security, video-on-demand, security, and database offerings.

The company has plans to enhance those services, and also to build the collaboration business it has built around the Voov video meetings product and cloud storage offerings.

While the earnings call delved into that cloud strategy, Tencent does not break out cloud revenue and counts it among "other business services" – a category that grew 25 per cent through the year to deliver $7.5 billion of the $22.6 billion revenue Tencent achieved in Q4, and $27 billion of the $87.9 billion revenue for the full FY2021 (representing 34 per cent category growth and 16 per cent overall revenue growth). But that "other" category now tops revenue earned by Tencent's games division. Overall growth, however, was slower than at any time in Tencent's history. Execs said the company is preparing to live with lower growth as just a fact of life as the markets in which it plays mature.

New regulations imposed by China's government helped apply the brakes, especially to Tencent's gaming, education, and advertising businesses, but management welcomed those changes.

"For several years, industry participants have overemphasized zero-sum competition, aggressive marketing reckless expansion, short-term growth, and corporate benefits, overlooking the most important elements of sustainable growth," said Lau. "As a result, the industry's growth has become frothy and unhealthy," he added, going on to say that new regulations "correct this behavior by industry participants in multiple sectors and promote fair competition, user protection, and data security."

Tencent's earnings presentation included the usual startlingly large numbers, led by the 1.268 billion average monthly user count for its Weixin and WeChat messaging services.

One of Tencent's top games, League of Legends, attracted 74 million concurrent viewers to its lived-streamed World Championship event, and an animated series featuring the game topped Netflix's English-language viewing charts in the week of its release.

That makes Tencent one of few Chinese companies with a big cultural footprint outside the Middle Kingdom – an irony, given that within China minors are restricted to three hours gaming each week, and computer games are frowned upon by the government. ®

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Drone ship carrying yet more drones launches in China
    Zhuhai Cloud will carry 50 flying and diving machines it can control with minimal human assistance

    Chinese academics have christened an ocean research vessel that has a twist: it will sail the seas with a complement of aerial and ocean-going drones and no human crew.

    The Zhu Hai Yun, or Zhuhai Cloud, launched in Guangzhou after a year of construction. The 290-foot-long mothership can hit a top speed of 18 knots (about 20 miles per hour) and will carry 50 flying, surface, and submersible drones that launch and self-recover autonomously. 

    According to this blurb from the shipbuilder behind its construction, the Cloud will also be equipped with a variety of additional observational instruments "which can be deployed in batches in the target sea area, and carry out task-oriented adaptive networking to achieve three-dimensional view of specific targets." Most of the ship is an open deck where flying drones can land and be stored. The ship is also equipped with launch and recovery equipment for its aquatic craft. 

    Continue reading
  • Experts: AI should be recognized as inventors in patent law
    Plus: Police release deepfake of murdered teen in cold case, and more

    In-brief Governments around the world should pass intellectual property laws that grant rights to AI systems, two academics at the University of New South Wales in Australia argued.

    Alexandra George, and Toby Walsh, professors of law and AI, respectively, believe failing to recognize machines as inventors could have long-lasting impacts on economies and societies. 

    "If courts and governments decide that AI-made inventions cannot be patented, the implications could be huge," they wrote in a comment article published in Nature. "Funders and businesses would be less incentivized to pursue useful research using AI inventors when a return on their investment could be limited. Society could miss out on the development of worthwhile and life-saving inventions."

    Continue reading
  • Declassified and released: More secret files on US govt's emergency doomsday powers
    Nuke incoming? Quick break out the plans for rationing, censorship, property seizures, and more

    More papers describing the orders and messages the US President can issue in the event of apocalyptic crises, such as a devastating nuclear attack, have been declassified and released for all to see.

    These government files are part of a larger collection of records that discuss the nature, reach, and use of secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents: these are executive orders, announcements, and statements to Congress that are all ready to sign and send out as soon as a doomsday scenario occurs. PEADs are supposed to give America's commander-in-chief immediate extraordinary powers to overcome extraordinary events.

    PEADs have never been declassified or revealed before. They remain hush-hush, and their exact details are not publicly known.

    Continue reading
  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022