World needs multilateral chip tech export bans to hurt China – think tank

Current arrangements may promote offshore workarounds and don't make life hard enough

Sanctions on transfer of chipmaking tech to China might be driving more offshore chipmaking, and therefore failing to achieve strategic goals.

That argument is the central theme of a policy brief titled Preserving the Chokepoints, by the Center for Security and Emerging Technology at Georgetown University.

The document has no beef with the aims of US sanctions, which are to keep China reliant on democratic nations for the chipmaking tech – not actual chips - it needs, while preventing the Communist nation from developing competitive product. Indeed, the document's very name argues that chokepoints are a good idea.

But the brief's authors believe that sanctions aren't effective because US chip tech companies see offshoring as a way to work around unliteral bans and keep supplying Chinese customers from their overseas facilities.

The document doesn't call for an end to offshoring – acknowledging that it is sometimes necessary to access talent, or to acquire companies.

It suggests instead a multilateral framework for chip tech bans. Existing multilateral pacts such as the Wassenaar Agreement – which prevents export of dual-use technologies – are hard to amend and have been signed by nations like Russia that may not wish to extend its scope. Nor has Wassenaar been signed by some nations that are major sources of important chipmaking tech.

The brief notes with pleasure that the US, Japan, and the Netherlands – the world's three dominant sources of chipmaking tech – have already started work on just such an agreement. The document's authors rate progress of that pact as "welcome and urgently needed."

The document asserts that the US congress should fund the CHIPS Act to ensure more semiconductor activity returns to US soil and offer many other subsidies besides. ®

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Proposed Innovation Act amendment would block US investment in China
    We're just astounded to see bipartisan efforts in Congress in this day and age

    A draft US law that would, for one thing, subsidize the US semiconductor industry, has gained an amendment that would turn the screws on American investments in foreign countries.

    The proposed update states that semiconductors, large-capacity batteries, pharmaceuticals, rare-earth elements biotech, AI, quantum computing, hypersonics, fintech and autonomous technologies are all included as sectors in which foreign investment would be limited, specifically in "countries of concern," or those considered foreign adversaries, like China. The amendment also would restrict construction investments and joint ventures that would involve sharing of IP and monetary rewards.

    US entities that have invested in a sector or country covered under the amendment would be required to notify the federal government, and the proposal also includes authorization for the executive branch to form an interagency panel responsible for reviewing and blocking foreign investments on national security grounds, the Wall Street Journal said of the amendment.

    Continue reading
  • Xi Jinping himself weighs in on how Big Tech should deploy FinTech
    Beijing also outlines its GovTech vision and gets very excited about data

    China's government has outlined its vision for digital services, expected behavior standards at China's big tech companies, and how China will put data to work everywhere – with president Xi Jinping putting his imprimatur to some of the policies.

    Xi's remarks were made in his role as director of China’s Central Comprehensively Deepening Reforms Commission, which met earlier this week. The subsequent communiqué states that at the meeting Xi called for "financial technology platform enterprises to return to their core business" and "support platform enterprises in playing a bigger role in serving the real economy and smoothing positive interplay between domestic and international economic flows."

    The remarks outline an attempt to balance Big Tech's desire to create disruptive financial products that challenge monopolies, against efforts to ensure that only licensed and regulated entities offer financial services.

    Continue reading
  • Always read the comments: Beijing requires oversight of all reader-generated chat
    'Editing and review' teams will be required to read everything and report dissent

    The Cyberspace Administration of China has announced a policy requiring all comments made to websites to be approved before publication.

    Outlined in a document published last Friday and titled "Provisions on the Administration of Internet Thread Commenting Services", the policy is aimed at making China's internet safer, and better represent citizens' interests. The Administration believes this can only happen if comments are reviewed so that only posts that promote socialist values and do not stir dissent make it online.

    To stop the nasties being published, the policy outlines requirements for publishers to hire "a review and editing team suitable for the scale of services".

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022