CSO

Software patching must work like car safety recalls, says US cyber boss

Adds infosec regulation coming to more industries but with a light touch, more collaboration


Black Hat Asia Software made unsafe by dependencies should be fixed without users needing to interact with the source of the problem, according to US National Cyber Director Chris Inglis, who serves in the Executive Office of the President.

Speaking to The Register at the Black Hat Asia conference in Singapore on Friday, Inglis said that when a faulty component in a car needs to be replaced, the manufacturer who chose that component takes responsibility for securing safe parts and arranging their installation. He contrasted that arrangement with the fix for the Log4j bug, which required users to seek assistance from both vendors that used the open-source logging code and source software from the Log4j project itself.

Inglis wants vendors to take responsibility for their choices so that addressing security issues is easier and users' systems – and the US – can achieve better resilience with less effort.

The director said such a change is the sort of thing he considers a necessary regulatory requirement for the digital age because to date some sources of problems have evaded responsibility or the costs of their errors.

The Biden administration has already shown its intention to increase technology regulation with initiatives such as the Executive Order aimed at modernizing national defenses in the wake of attacks on SolarWinds, Microsoft Exchange, and the incident that closed the Colonial Pipeline. Another possible action has seen the SEC float shorter compulsory reporting windows for public companies hit by infosec incidents, as well as periodic market updates on security efforts.

Inglis told The Register more regulation is coming, and while he wants watchdogs to have the "lightest possible touch," he also hopes to impose a "capital cost" on businesses to ensure they invest to improve their capabilities.

The director could offer no time frame for the delivery of new regulations, saying the administration is considering the needs of many industries.

One activity he wants to see more of is collaboration between government and the private sector, and more collaboration among agencies.

Inglis feels such efforts are essential because no entity knows or understands everything it needs to improve its information security. The director described collaborations in which entities each bring their own view of a situation to the table, and each gains the fuller view needed to tackle problems only after sharing information.

"We often overestimate what a government would know, or underestimate what the private sector knows," he told the conference.

He instead hopes organizations can share "a degree of professional intimacy such that we can discover things together that no one of us can do alone… so we discover something no one could have discovered alone."

National security agencies in the UK and Israel do this well, he said. And the US's efforts are improving thanks to the work of the Joint Cyber Defense Collaborative run by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

"The concept is beginning to work," he said. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022