This article is more than 1 year old
UK Online Safety law threatens Big Tech bosses with jail
Two years in the clink proposed for not thinking of the children
Leaders of social media companies could face up to two years in jail if they repeatedly fail to protect children from harmful content online, under the latest amendments said to have been added to the UK's Online Safety Bill.
Under the proposed rules, technology executives could be held criminally liable for violating statutes in the bill, including failing to remove illegal content or censor posts relating to cyberbullying, self-harm or suicide, for all users under 18 years old.
Michelle Donelan, the UK's Culture Secretary, has reportedly accepted these changes, which were advocated by a group of Conservative Party rebel MPs led by Miriam Cates, representing Penistone and Stocksbridge, and Sir Bill Cash standing for Stone in Staffordshire.
The Conservative Party has squabbled over the UK Online Safety Bill for months, causing delays to passage of amendments. Government MPs want social media companies and web giants, like TikTok, Meta, Twitter, and Google, to bolster safety protocols prohibiting online harassment, stalking, revenge pornography, fraud, the sale of illegal drugs and weapons without limiting free speech.
- UK lawmakers look to enforce blocking tools for legal but harmful content
- UK's Online Safety Bill drops rules forcing social media to remove 'legal but harmful' content
- Scanning phones to detect child abuse evidence is harmful, 'magical' thinking
- California lawmakers approve online privacy law for kids. Which may turn websites into identity checkpoints
A previous version of the bill called for jail time only if officials refused to cooperate with information requests from UK communications regulator Ofcom. Lawmakers have now successfully proposed amendments that would see tech executives face up to two years in jail for consistently failing to comply with the bill's rules.
The social media industry lobby group TechUK has previously warned the UK government that the threat of criminal prosecutions could deter investment and drive companies to leave the country.
"The government has clearly accepted the argument that the strictest sanctions need to apply for harming children," Cates said in a reported statement. "This is a good outcome. We are going to have the scope to address all the harms for children. That is very positive."
Meanwhile Cash noted that a similar bill is currently being considered by lawmakers in Ireland. "There will be prison for those senior managers who fail to comply with enforcement requirements. I have been speaking to Irish lawyers and they say it is really effective and that is where we are," he added.
Websites and apps may also need to perform some sort of age check of their users, or find, state, and deploy some way of limiting children's access, under the proposed law in the UK, depending on the content of the platform. A pornography site, for instance, will likely have to demonstrate how it's robustly preventing under-age netizens from viewing explicit material. ®