Roses are red, algorithms are blue, here's a poem I made a machine write for you
Valentine's Day is the moment to fall a little bit out of love with chatbots
Opinion Valentine's Day could sour our romance with AI chatbots.
February 14 may become that tipping point when large numbers of lazy Lotharios use machines to generate text expressing borrowed emotions about their (supposed) loved ones instead of searching their miserable, shrunken souls for a personal and original expression of their feelings.
Lovers, a little advice: "Roses are red, algorithms are blue, here's a poem I made a machine write for you" won't increase your chances of keeping your relationship alive until Valentine's Day 2024.
But it will increase the chance of your poetry, and rightfully indignant responses to it, going viral and earning widespread ridicule.
Bad AI love poems, some of which this hack expects will be grotesque, have enormous potential to deflate the bubble of enthusiasm for AI chatbots and challenge the notion they are productivity-enhancing miracles.
That idea ignores the clear case for being very, very cautious with chatbots because the companies offering and enthusing about them have terrible track records when it comes to responsibly deploying algorithmic technology.
Google's algorithms and AI turned YouTube into a machine for force-feeding misinformation that helped poison politics. Facebook's AI did likewise. OpenAI ignored intellectual property rights by allowing GPT and DALL-E to mimic artists' work, a classic StartupLand play of building a servce capable of winning an audience and inflating valuations first, and worrying about ethics later.
And Microsoft? An amusing meme doing the rounds on social media depicts a Scooby-Doo scene in which the mask comes off the villainous ChatGPT, revealing… Clippy!
Enthusiasm for chatbots has also – bizarrely – made it acceptable to outsource baseline mediocrity to machines instead of humans. Wikipedia is our current knowledge acquisition mediocrity baseline. While the crowdsourced encyclopedia is famously flawed, it is transparent and allows anyone to participate in its creation and editing.
Chatbots, by contrast, are closed systems.
Yet they've been instantly assumed to be worthy tools, a baffling surrender to the new algorithm-approval orthodoxy.
And a doubly baffling surrender given that people are increasingly interested in careful and crafted experiences, not mass-produced mediocrity.
- Google's AI search bot Bard makes $120b error on day one
- Google shows off upcoming AI search features, leaves Bard waiting in the wings
- Conversational AI tells us what we want to hear – a fib that the Web is reliable and friendly
- Microsoft tells people to prepare for AI search engine that goes Bing!
My local council recently mapped out an "Ale Trail" connecting the 13(!) craft breweries in my neighborhood. They exist because people want thoughtful, playful, human, alternatives to mass-produced experiences.
I'm very fond of beer, and a challenge. So I've been applying my organic intelligence to figure out if it is humanly possible to drink at all 13 watering holes on a single trip along the trail.
I've not reached a definitive conclusion, other than that such an endeavor won't be a suitable Valentine's Day activity. ®