Security

UK snubs Apple-Google coronavirus app API, insists on British control of data, promises to protect privacy

Why do it at all? Easier to audit and adapt, apparently


Analysis The UK has decided to break with growing international consensus and insist its upcoming coronavirus contact-tracing app is run through centralised British servers – rather than follow the decentralized Apple-Google approach.

In a blog post just before the weekend, the CEO of the National Health Service’s tech unit NHSX Matthew Gould, and the app’s main overseer Dr Geraint Lewis, said their new smartphone application will launch “in the coming weeks,” and stressed it “could be important in helping the country return to normality and beating coronavirus.”

But within the details over how it would work, the memo revealed the NHS and UK government reckon the contact-tracing protocols built by Apple and Google protect user privacy under advisement only. Thus, the British health service is in favor of a system that sends data on who may have the virus to a centralised server, and puts the NHS in charge of who is contacted and when.

Both techniques, Apple-Google and NHS, rely on Bluetooth: simply put, your phone wirelessly emits an electronic ID that other phones will pick up when they are in close proximity. If someone tests positive for COVID-19, their ID will be used to alert others who have been near them: an ID will be flagged as infected, and if you've been near that ID, then you may have caught the novel coronavirus, too, and will be warned as such.

Apple and Google, specifically, created an opt-in pro-privacy API for iOS and Android that allows your phone to periodically change its ID as well as store the IDs of other phones it comes close to. Then, if someone is found to have COVID-19, they can authorise the release of their phone’s IDs to a decentralized set of databases managed by healthcare providers, and if another user’s phone recognizes those IDs in the databases – ie: they were close to them recently – they are alerted to the fact by apps that plug into the API.

This particular approach is designed to ensure no one can use it to track individuals: Apple and Google reckon their cryptography-based protocol will make it difficult for governments and miscreants to monitor people – certainly Apple and Google will be none the wiser. Data stays on people's phones, and is only released to providers' databases when the user wants to. And they stay anonymous. To declare yourself infected, you need to enter a special code from a healthcare provider after testing positive – otherwise trolls could derail the system by falsely announcing themselves infected en masse.

An analysis by Brit developer David Llewellyn-Jones, among others, shows this is a decent enough solution, though a point of failure is the apps themselves that plug into the API: they cannot be allowed to siphon off sensitive information gleaned from the contact-tracing protocol.

As an alternative to all of this, the NHS proposes using a centralized approach, in which everyone's whereabouts and any other information is simply uploaded to a government-owned database and analyzed there.

Uptake

Experts say that for a contact-tracing app to be effective, about 60 per cent or more of the population will need to download it on their phones and opt-in. As a result, privacy concerns are critical to the app’s success: if people don’t trust it, they won’t install it.

While there are some advantages and disadvantages to a centralised NHS and decentralised Apple-Google model, the fact that high adoption is critical has led a slew of countries including Switzerland, Estonia, and Austria plumping for the decentralised privacy-protecting approach.

In addition, Germany has backtracked on its plans to run a centralised service, saying on Sunday it will switch to a "strongly decentralised approach," and France – which insisted on a centralised approach – is facing growing backlash from security experts, many of whom have signed a letter opposing its plans.

Apple and Google tweak key bits of contact-tracing privacy plan

READ MORE

Despite this, however, the NHS has rejected the decentralised approach in favor of putting itself in control. The NHS app will grab all the IDs of all phones running the app, and store and process it all on its own servers. Then, if someone finds they have the virus and tells the app, whoever is in charge of the NHS database will decide how, when, and if, to alert other phones.

The NHS has been keen to stress that it will protect people’s privacy despite effectively granting itself real-time location tracking. “The data will only ever be used for NHS care, management, evaluation and research,” the blog post stated.

“You will always be able to delete the app and all associated data whenever you want. We will always comply with the law around the use of your data, including the Data Protection Act and will explain how we intend to use it.

“We will be totally open and transparent about your choices in the app and what they mean. If we make any changes to how the app works over time, we will explain in plain English why those changes were made and what they mean for you. Your privacy is crucial to the NHS, and so while these are unusual times, we are acutely aware of our obligations to you.”

Yes, but why?

The obvious question however is: why? Why take this approach at all, especially when the rest of the world is moving toward a decentralised approach?

The answer appears to be that those in charge think it will work better. “The app will advise you what action to take if you have been close to someone who has become symptomatic – including advising you to self-isolate if necessary,” the blog post stated. “The exact advice on what you should do will depend on the evolving context and approach.”

In other words, rather than simply receive an alert that will, presumably, be hard-coded into the app itself, the centralised server approach would, in theory, allow the NHS to send more personalised messages. It goes on: “Scientists and doctors will continuously support us to fine-tune the app to ensure it is as helpful as possible both to individuals and to the NHS in managing the pandemic.”

Whether that is a theoretical advantage or a pragmatic one is hard to know. If the NHS was swamped with hundreds of thousands or even millions of alerts, it would likely have to resort to automated default responses regardless.

Another reason put forward by the NHS is that it wants the ability to build a more extensive database, through app updates, in which additional data is provided by individual users but can then be attached to existing profiles in the centralized database and so help health professionals deal more effectively with the virus.

“In future releases of the app, people will be able to choose to provide the NHS with extra information about themselves to help us identify hotspots and trends. Those of us who agree to provide this extra information will be playing a key role in providing additional information about the spread of COVID-19 that will contribute towards protecting the health of others and getting the country back to normal in a controlled way, as restrictions ease.”

Lower risk

One of the epidemiologists working on the project, Professor Christophe Fraser, told the BBC on Monday: "One of the advantages is that it's easier to audit the system and adapt it more quickly as scientific evidence accumulates… The principal aim is to give notifications to people who are most at risk of having got infected, and not to people who are much lower risk. It's probably easier to do that with a centralised system."

But the end result is that the NHS plans to do exactly what people are concerned about: build a highly specific database of people, their movements and the health status, and have it populated by automated data uploads from anyone who has installed the app.

It will be a major test of how much people trust the NHS with their personal information, and how much they trust the UK government not to copy or exploit that data in future for different purposes. ®

PS: This was a fear the NHS app would burn through people's batteries by using Bluetooth – whereas the Apple-Google interface runs minimally in the background. However, it appears the NHS has found a compromise in that it will run its app intermittently in the foreground.

Send us news
222 Comments

Thanks, Sir Clive Sinclair, from Reg readers whose careers you created and lives you shaped

Former staff, kids who got their first taste of tech, a Reg hack, and even Linus Torvalds share what the electronics pioneer meant to them

Sir Clive Sinclair's contributions to computing and business are well known, and we've done our best to celebrate his life in our obituary of the electronics pioneer, who passed last week aged 81.

To mark his life we felt it appropriate to also consider his impact on Reg readers.

Like many others, your correspondent's first computer was a ZX Spectrum. The machine led to my presence in these pages, because I eventually joined the Australian ZX Users' Association (AZUA), which published its own magazine and invited contributions.

Continue reading

Space tourists splash down in Atlantic Ocean after three days in orbit

Some sightseeing, music, gambling, chatting to folks back home – just like a regular roadtrip

The space tourist crew who spent three days orbiting Earth in a SpaceX Dragon capsule has returned to our planet in one piece.

The gang, dubbed Inspiration4, splashed down in the Atlantic Ocean off the Florida coast just after 1900 EST (2300 UTC) on Saturday. They were checked over by doctors and flown by helicopter to land.

Continue reading

Apple, Google yank opposition voting strategy app from Russian software stores

Oh, sorry, we thought you wanted us to obey the law?! – Silicon Valley

A tactical-voting app built by allies of Vladimir Putin’s jailed political opponent Alexei Navalny is now unavailable in Russian Apple and Google app stores following threats of fines from the Kremlin.

According to state-owned news agency TASS, Russian lawmaker Andrei Klimov told reporters on Thursday that the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office sent statutory notices to Google and Apple ordering a takedown of the Navalny app on the grounds it was collecting personal data of Russian citizens and sought to interfere in the nation's elections. Refusal to do so would result in penalties.

“The app particularly deliberately and illegally spreads election campaign materials in the interests of some candidates vying for positions in elective agencies or against the interests of such," Klimov said.

Continue reading

Google extends right-to-be-forgotten to app permissions on older Android devices

Software unused after a few months will lose access to sensitive features unless exempted

In December, Google plans to have app runtime permissions expire on older versions of Android for apps that haven't been opened for several months, extending the availability of a privacy protection feature introduced in Android 11.

"In Android 11, we introduced the permission auto-reset feature," explained Google software engineers Peter Visontay and Bessie Jiang in a blog post on Friday. "This feature helps protect user privacy by automatically resetting an app’s runtime permissions – which are permissions that display a prompt to the user when requested – if the app isn’t used for a few months."

That behavior is the default in Android 11 and in Android 12, expected in a few weeks. Come December, it will become the default in older versions of Android that rely on Google Play services, specifically Android 6 (API level 23) through Android 10 (API level 29).

Continue reading

Yes, of course there's now malware for Windows Subsystem for Linux

Once dismissed proof-of-concept attack on Microsoft OS through WSL detected in the wild

Linux binaries have been found trying to take over Windows systems in what appears to be the first publicly identified malware to utilize Microsoft's Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) to install unwelcome payloads.

On Thursday, Black Lotus Labs, the threat research group at networking biz Lumen Technologies, said it had spotted several malicious Python files compiled in the Linux binary format ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) for Debian Linux.

"These files acted as loaders running a payload that was either embedded within the sample or retrieved from a remote server and was then injected into a running process using Windows API calls," Black Lotus Labs said in a blog post.

Continue reading

Microsoft does and doesn't require VMs to meet hardware requirements for Windows 11

Either way, it's bad news for VirtualBox – it's stopped working

Microsoft emitted a fresh build of Windows 11 last night, and piled on the woe for some customers hoping that virtual machines might be their way out of the hardware compatibility hole.

Despite Microsoft's efforts to distract users by showing off its updates to the Photos app – now rolling out to users in the Windows Insider Dev Channel – the alarming warning that "this build includes a change that aligns the enforcement of the Windows 11 system requirements on Virtual Machines (VMs) to be the same as it is for physical PCs" was the main news for many testers.

Microsoft also said Hyper-V VMs of Windows 11 need to be Generation 2 VMs, and virtual machines running on virtualization and emulation products from other vendors, such as VMware and Oracle, "will continue to work as long as the hardware requirements are met."

Continue reading

Microsoft doles out Office Long Term Servicing Channel for cloud refuseniks

Redmond doesn't do things by half – unless it's Long Term Support

Microsoft has grudgingly admitted that not everyone will want to ascend to its cloud with the Long Term Servicing Channel (LTSC) version of its Office cash cow.

Earlier this year, the Windows behemoth announced that it was axing the length of support. No longer would customers enjoy decade-long delight. Instead, support would last for just five years, in line with Windows.

The release of this perpetual version is for commercial and government customers. The consumer version, Office 2021, will turn up on 5 October and likely be drowned out by users realising their PCs won't run Microsoft's latest version of Windows because OEMs want the gravy train to keep rolling of more stringent hardware requirements aimed at improving the user experience.

Continue reading

Sir Clive Sinclair: Personal computing pioneer missed out on being Britain's Steve Jobs

Lifelong cost focus was his namesake company's corporate downfall

Obituary Sir Clive Sinclair, the visionary pioneer of computing for the British masses and creator of the legendary ZX Spectrum, has died at the age of 81. His legacy is the British tech scene as we know it today.

Born in leafy Richmond, Surrey, at the height of the Battle of Britain in July 1940, he came to epitomise the early era of British computing through his company Sinclair Research Ltd and its iconic Spectrum product line.

Continue reading

Punchy Biden-lookalike grandad goes viral for fighting boxing gadget

'If you don't get your timing right you get whacked round the back of the head' admits scrappy octogenarian

An 80-year-old Lancashire grandfather has gone viral on TikTok and Instagram in a video featuring him squaring off with a sparring aid for boxers.

The video (see here) of Bob "Bruiser" Smith of Bamber Bridge near Preston ducking and diving around the Sparbar sparring device has received over 90 million views across the two social media sites.

The pugilistic pensioner – who was a fighter in his youth but banned from the ring by his father at the age of 14 out of concern for his safety – is treating his unexpected global fame with refreshing indifference.

Continue reading

Something phishy: Tech recruiters jabbed by fake COVID-19 Passport scam

Tells clients it is tackling the issue

An IT recruitment agency says a "phishing scam" is behind a fake email sent to its customers with details on how to apply for a "Coronavirus Digital Passport."

The email – sent to applicants and clients of Concept Resourcing, based in Dudley, England, on 14 September and seen by The Reg – claimed users could "Get your Digital Coronavirus Passports (HPS) today" and showed recipients a big juicy link where they could do so.

The link was not a genuine NHS website and appears to have been deleted shortly after.

Continue reading

How long till some drunkard puts a foot through one of BT's 'iconic, digital smart city communication hubs'?

Phonebox upgrade dishes out internet and more in Kensington and Chelsea

BT was joined by local dignitaries including the Mayor of Kensington to cut the silk sash on its 21st-century phone box that gives people access to free Gigabit Wi-Fi, rapid mobile phone charging, and free calls if needed.

The BT Street Hub 2.0 unit is now up and running in Notting Hill Gate with others due to be unveiled in the London borough of Kensington and Chelsea shortly.

The pods are also plastered with advertising, with BT trumpeting that it's giving small businesses the chance to snap up £7.5m of free street advertising space as part of its launch promo.

Continue reading