Security

Clothes retailer Fatface: Someone's broken in and accessed your personal data, including partial card payment details... Don't tell anyone

'Strictly private and confidential'? SERIOUSLY?


Updated British clothes retailer Fatface has infuriated some customers by telling them "an unauthorised third party" gained access to systems holding their data earlier this year, and then asking them to keep news of the blunder to themselves.

Several people wrote into The Register to let us know about the personal data leak, with reader Terry saying: "You will notice the Fatface email is marked as confidential. This annoyed me."

Chief exec Liz Evans wrote in an email titled "Strictly private and confidential – Notice of security incident" sent to users yesterday:

Please do keep this email and the information included within it strictly private and confidential.

What happened?

On 17 January 2021, FatFace identified some suspicious activity within its IT systems. We immediately launched an investigation... [and] determined that an unauthorised third party had gained access to certain systems operated by us during a limited period of time earlier the same month....

Some of your personal data may have been involved in the incident. This could include some or all of the below listed categories of information relating to you.

  • First name and surname.
  • Email address.
  • Address details.
  • Partial payment card information by way of the last 4 digits and expiry date.

Please rest assured that full payment card information was not compromised. We have been working with the relevant authorities and external security experts to ensure a comprehensive response to the incident. In addition, we have notified the Information Commissioner’s Office in the UK and other law enforcement authorities of this incident.

We have taken various additional steps to further strengthen the security of our systems. Please rest assured that our systems are secure, our website remains fully operational and FatFace is a safe place to shop, both in store (when we can reopen our shops) and online.

Quite reasonably, customers quickly took to social media to ask where they could find "a public statement on your data breach," why it had waited so long to inform customers, why the mail was marked "confidential" and whether it was genuine. All were directed to kindly "DM" the firm's social media handler.

It also noted that it would be giving recipients "access to a complimentary Experian Identity Plus membership... purely out of an abundance of caution and not because we consider your data specifically to be at risk."

It did not detail how many people had been affected. The firm has "200 stores across the UK and Ireland" – doing particularly well in seaside areas – and offers international shipping, although its website currently says this is unavailable.

According to its most recent financials filed at Companies House, full accounts for the 52 weeks up to 30 May 2020 [PDF], the Group's revenue dropped to £198.2m from £236.4m in 2019, but noted that its online business had "doubled in the last five years."

Fatface obtained refinancing last year to reduce its debts and said it had "seen the benefits of the staycation trend in our local market towns and holiday destination stores."

Also in the document, the org said it had firewalls in place and that it made "regular checks... on the security of our systems" and was "implementing Multi-Factor authentication (MFA)," which would be in place by 2020/21.

It also said: "We have commenced a programme of work to upgrade some of our older applications with a modern, cloud-based application with Phase 1 completed and a further phase scheduled for 2021," adding that the "Group has also commenced a core system replacement project which will happen over the next 2 years. Phase 1 has been approved and delivery is underway."

We have asked Fatface how far along it is with this project. We also asked about the extent of the breach as well as its decision to ask customers whose data had potentially been accessed to keep their mouths shut about it.

NCC Group admits its training data was leaked online after folders full of CREST pentest certification exam notes posted to GitHub

READ MORE

Ironically, Fatface itself also noted in the financial results document that any "failure to react appropriately in the event of breach... could result in financial penalties or reputational damage."

Neil Brown, a tech-savvy lawyer who runs decoded.legal, told us: "An organisation, which may have failed to keep its customers’ information private, asking those very customers to keep Fatface’s information private? The irony.

"It’s not something I have seen before, and it’s unlikely to enamour Fatface to those whose information has been — or may have been — compromised."

UK data watchdog the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) told The Register: "People have the right to expect that organisations will handle their personal information securely and responsibly.

"When a data incident happens, we would expect an organisation to consider whether it is appropriate to contact those affected, and to consider whether there are steps that can be taken to protect them from any potential adverse effects.

"Fatface has made us aware of an incident and we are making enquiries." ®

Updated to add

French publication LeMagIT reports that FatFace paid a $2m ransom, negotiated down from about $8m, to the Conti ransomware gang, which broke into the retailer's network in January, siphoned 200GB, and scrambled its files.

Send us news
42 Comments

US govt hiding top hurricane forecast model sparks outrage after deadly Helene

Taxpayer-funded data locked behind insurance firm's paywall

Germany’s CDU still struggling to restore data months after June cyberattack

Putting a spanner in work for plans of opposition party to launch a comeback during next year's elections

EU tries to pin down China on definition of 'important data'

Rules on cross border data transfers have European businesses scratching their heads

Facebook whistleblower calls for transparency in social media, AI

Frances Haugen says navigating the digital world requires a North Star

Texas sues GM for selling driver data to analytics, insurance companies

Lone Star State alleges GM cashed in with "millions in lump sum payments" from the sale

US claims TikTok shipped personal data to China – <i>very</i> personal data

Not even Oracle could stop it, claims DoJ

Group of 91 nations agree to continue not taxing cross-border data movement – for now

Promote free use of government data, privacy, canning spam, and more

Teradata takes plunge into lakehouse waters, but not everyone is convinced

We have not changed our minds, the industry has evolved, data warehouse stalwart claims

Big brains divided over training AI with more AI: Is model collapse inevitable?

Gosh, here's us thinking recursion was a solved problem

Big Tech, VC firms pump $1B into ML data darling Scale AI

Be careful not to over-inflate, you may burst your bubble

AT&amp;T, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile US fined $200M for selling off people's location info

Carriers claim real culprits are getting away with it - the data brokers

Stack Overflow simply bans folks who don't want their advice used to train AI

Give us an opt-out button or give us (temporary) account death!