Offbeat

Photographer seeks $12m in copyright damages over claims Capcom ripped off her snaps in Resident Evil 4 art

From pictures of shattered glass to patterns on doors and much more


A US designer has sued for damages of around $12m amid allegations that Japanese games developer Capcom breached copyright by using her photos in titles including the massively popular Resident Evil.

The lawsuit [PDF] alleges that Capcom used around 80 images – originally photographed by professional scenic artist and designer Judy Juracek – in its games and without her permission.

A number of those images are said to have been published in a book called Surfaces – along with an accompanying CD-ROM – by Juracek in 1996. In the 13-page submission filed in the US District Court of Connecticut last Friday, along with 134 pages of evidence comparing her images to those in the game [PDF], lawyers acting for Juracek highlighted two instances that they say point to copyright infringement.

The first centres on a photo taken by Juracek in Italy of a "unique looking glass shatter pattern" that allegedly forms part of "Capcom's primary logo for Resident Evil."

The second relates to a photo of intricate scrollwork on a wooden panel taken inside a Rhode Island mansion that forms part of a door in Resident Evil 4.

Arguing their case, Juracek's lawyers stated: "It is hard to imagine that Juracek would take a photo of shattered glass in Italy and interior mansion door design and that Capcom artists would reproduce the exact same pattern of shattered glass in a logo and interior door design without benefit of Juracek's photographs."

In all, it's claimed that Capcom used approximately 80 or more of Juracek's photographs, which appeared more than 200 times in Resident Evil games.

Lawyers are seeking $12m in damages plus legal fees and that the case be heard in front of a jury.

No one from Capcom was available for comment at the time of writing. ®

Send us news
50 Comments

MPs ask: Why is it so freakin' hard to get AI giants to pay copyright holders?

Agreement on consent and compensation has failed to materialize

US House mulls forcing AI makers to reveal use of copyrighted training data

Proposed law doesn't include any ban on use of such stuff to build models, mind you

Bon Jovi, Billy Eilish, other musicians implore AI devs to think of humanity

Using copyrighted material to train models affects artists' livelihoods, says open letter

New York Times: OpenAI’s claim we 'hacked' its products both 'irrelevant' and 'false'

Media giant's counterfiling accuses AI darling of 'spin' in copyright infringement case

Filing NeMo: Nvidia's AI framework hit with copyright lawsuit

Claims allegedly pirated content from Books3 dataset trawled by its models

Microsoft: Copyright law didn't stop the VCR and shouldn't stop the LLM

Lawyers argue content used to train LLMs does not 'supplant the market' for news

OpenAI sued, again, for scraping and replicating news stories

The Intercept, Raw Story, AlterNet want damages and to have their content removed from models

Husqvarna ports Doom to a robot lawnmower – not, thankfully, its chainsaws

Seminal game runs on everything, so why not pay €2,199 to run it on a tiny screen?

OpenAI claims New York Times paid someone to 'hack' ChatGPT

Super lab alleges 'deceptive prompts' that it happily processed - and may have tracked - weren't fair, so case should be dismissed

Judge crosses out some claims by writers against OpenAI, lets them have another crack at it

Scribes may have a point about unfair competition, direct copyright infringement

Thar be safe harbor: Reddit defeats third attempt to unmask digital pirates

First Amendment is a rule, not a guideline, says judge

OpenAI: 'Impossible to train today’s leading AI models without using copyrighted materials'

As IEEE study shows super lab's neural nets can emit 'plagiaristic output'